Cargando…
Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure
Using a continuous exposure variable that is measured with random error in a univariable linear regression model leads to regression dilution bias: the observed association between the exposure and outcome is smaller than it would be if the true value of the exposure could be used. A repeatability s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz055 |
_version_ | 1783470820158341120 |
---|---|
author | Morgan, Katy E Cook, Sarah Leon, David A Frost, Chris |
author_facet | Morgan, Katy E Cook, Sarah Leon, David A Frost, Chris |
author_sort | Morgan, Katy E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using a continuous exposure variable that is measured with random error in a univariable linear regression model leads to regression dilution bias: the observed association between the exposure and outcome is smaller than it would be if the true value of the exposure could be used. A repeatability sub-study, where a sample of study participants have their data measured again, can be used to correct for this bias. It is important to perform a sample size calculation for such a sub-study, to ensure that correction factors can be estimated with sufficient precision. We describe how a previously published method can be used to calculate the sample size from the anticipated size of the correction factor and its desired precision, and demonstrate this approach using the example of the cross-sectional studies conducted as part of the International Project on Cardiovascular Disease in Russia study. We also provide correction factors calculated from repeat data from the UK Biobank study, which can be used to help plan future repeatability studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6857752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68577522019-11-20 Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure Morgan, Katy E Cook, Sarah Leon, David A Frost, Chris Int J Epidemiol Education Corner Using a continuous exposure variable that is measured with random error in a univariable linear regression model leads to regression dilution bias: the observed association between the exposure and outcome is smaller than it would be if the true value of the exposure could be used. A repeatability sub-study, where a sample of study participants have their data measured again, can be used to correct for this bias. It is important to perform a sample size calculation for such a sub-study, to ensure that correction factors can be estimated with sufficient precision. We describe how a previously published method can be used to calculate the sample size from the anticipated size of the correction factor and its desired precision, and demonstrate this approach using the example of the cross-sectional studies conducted as part of the International Project on Cardiovascular Disease in Russia study. We also provide correction factors calculated from repeat data from the UK Biobank study, which can be used to help plan future repeatability studies. Oxford University Press 2019-10 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6857752/ /pubmed/31329929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz055 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Education Corner Morgan, Katy E Cook, Sarah Leon, David A Frost, Chris Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
title | Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
title_full | Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
title_fullStr | Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
title_full_unstemmed | Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
title_short | Reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
title_sort | reflection on modern methods: calculating a sample size for a repeatability sub-study to correct for measurement error in a single continuous exposure |
topic | Education Corner |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morgankatye reflectiononmodernmethodscalculatingasamplesizeforarepeatabilitysubstudytocorrectformeasurementerrorinasinglecontinuousexposure AT cooksarah reflectiononmodernmethodscalculatingasamplesizeforarepeatabilitysubstudytocorrectformeasurementerrorinasinglecontinuousexposure AT leondavida reflectiononmodernmethodscalculatingasamplesizeforarepeatabilitysubstudytocorrectformeasurementerrorinasinglecontinuousexposure AT frostchris reflectiononmodernmethodscalculatingasamplesizeforarepeatabilitysubstudytocorrectformeasurementerrorinasinglecontinuousexposure |