Cargando…

Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers

BACKGROUND: Early-onset or familial gastric cancer (GC) is known to have clinicopathologic profiles different from those of sporadic GC. We aimed to compare DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC. METHODS: GC samples were obtained from patients who u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hee Sung, Kim, Jong Won, Hwang, In Gyu, Lee, Hye Seung, Kim, Woo Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127894
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1369
_version_ 1783470842006470656
author Kim, Hee Sung
Kim, Jong Won
Hwang, In Gyu
Lee, Hye Seung
Kim, Woo Ho
author_facet Kim, Hee Sung
Kim, Jong Won
Hwang, In Gyu
Lee, Hye Seung
Kim, Woo Ho
author_sort Kim, Hee Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early-onset or familial gastric cancer (GC) is known to have clinicopathologic profiles different from those of sporadic GC. We aimed to compare DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC. METHODS: GC samples were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC at Seoul National University Hospital. Immunohistochemical analyses of various DNA damage response markers, including BRCA1, BRCA2, MRE11, RAD51C, and γH2AX, were performed using 54 early-onset GC, 59 familial GC, and 337 sporadic GC tissue microarray samples. Correlations between marker expression and clinicopathologic features were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses, and overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of γH2AX positivity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in early-onset or familial GC than in sporadic GC. In contrast, the rates of MRE11 negativity and RAD51C negativity were significantly higher in sporadic GC than in early-onset or familial GC. BRCA1 negativity was associated with decreased overall survival in sporadic GC (p = 0.002), and MRE11 negativity was associated with decreased overall survival in sporadic GC (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Our results show significant differences in DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6857889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68578892019-12-12 Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers Kim, Hee Sung Kim, Jong Won Hwang, In Gyu Lee, Hye Seung Kim, Woo Ho Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Early-onset or familial gastric cancer (GC) is known to have clinicopathologic profiles different from those of sporadic GC. We aimed to compare DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC. METHODS: GC samples were obtained from patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC at Seoul National University Hospital. Immunohistochemical analyses of various DNA damage response markers, including BRCA1, BRCA2, MRE11, RAD51C, and γH2AX, were performed using 54 early-onset GC, 59 familial GC, and 337 sporadic GC tissue microarray samples. Correlations between marker expression and clinicopathologic features were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses, and overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of γH2AX positivity was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in early-onset or familial GC than in sporadic GC. In contrast, the rates of MRE11 negativity and RAD51C negativity were significantly higher in sporadic GC than in early-onset or familial GC. BRCA1 negativity was associated with decreased overall survival in sporadic GC (p = 0.002), and MRE11 negativity was associated with decreased overall survival in sporadic GC (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Our results show significant differences in DNA damage response marker expression between early-onset or familial GC and sporadic GC. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6857889/ /pubmed/31127894 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1369 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Hee Sung
Kim, Jong Won
Hwang, In Gyu
Lee, Hye Seung
Kim, Woo Ho
Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers
title Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers
title_full Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers
title_fullStr Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers
title_short Expression of DNA Damage Response Markers in Early-Onset or Familial Gastric Cancers
title_sort expression of dna damage response markers in early-onset or familial gastric cancers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6857889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127894
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1369
work_keys_str_mv AT kimheesung expressionofdnadamageresponsemarkersinearlyonsetorfamilialgastriccancers
AT kimjongwon expressionofdnadamageresponsemarkersinearlyonsetorfamilialgastriccancers
AT hwangingyu expressionofdnadamageresponsemarkersinearlyonsetorfamilialgastriccancers
AT leehyeseung expressionofdnadamageresponsemarkersinearlyonsetorfamilialgastriccancers
AT kimwooho expressionofdnadamageresponsemarkersinearlyonsetorfamilialgastriccancers