Cargando…

Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the risk of serious infections (SIs) associated with biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozen, Gulsen, Pedro, Sofia, England, Bryant R., Mehta, Bella, Wolfe, Frederick, Michaud, Kaleb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11064
_version_ 1783470871324655616
author Ozen, Gulsen
Pedro, Sofia
England, Bryant R.
Mehta, Bella
Wolfe, Frederick
Michaud, Kaleb
author_facet Ozen, Gulsen
Pedro, Sofia
England, Bryant R.
Mehta, Bella
Wolfe, Frederick
Michaud, Kaleb
author_sort Ozen, Gulsen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the risk of serious infections (SIs) associated with biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied patients with RA who initiated bDMARDs or csDMARDs from 2001 to 2016 in FORWARD–The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases. Disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were categorized into three groups: (1) csDMARDs (bDMARD‐naïve; reference), (2) tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis), and (3) non‐TNFi biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and anakinra). SIs were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization or those resulting in death. We calculated the propensity score (PS), which reflected the probability of receiving a specific DMARD group, and estimated the hazard ratio (HR) (with the 95% confidence interval [CI]) for SI from multivariable Cox models, adjusting for PS and time‐varying confounders. RESULTS: A total of 694 (5.9%) first SIs were identified in 11 623 patients with RA during 27 552 patient‐years of follow‐up. The SI incidence rate per 1000 patient‐years was 22.4 (95% CI 19.2‐26.1) for csDMARDs, 26.9 (95% CI 24.5‐29.6) for TNFis, and 23.3 (95% CI 19.0‐28.5) for non‐TNFi bDMARDs. Adjusted HRs for SIs were 1.33 (95% CI 1.05‐1.68) for TNFis and 1.48 (95% CI 1.02‐2.16) for non‐TNFi bDMARDs, compared with csDMARDs. The SI risk with non‐TNFi bDMARDs versus TNFis was not different. Other risk factors for SI were older age, higher comorbidity burden (particularly pulmonary disease), higher weighted cumulative prednisone dose, disability and disease activity, and number of prior csDMARD failures. CONCLUSION: TNFis and non‐TNFi bDMARDs were associated with an increased SI risk compared with csDMARDs in RA, even after accounting for risk‐associated patient characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68580272019-11-27 Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Ozen, Gulsen Pedro, Sofia England, Bryant R. Mehta, Bella Wolfe, Frederick Michaud, Kaleb ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the risk of serious infections (SIs) associated with biological disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We studied patients with RA who initiated bDMARDs or csDMARDs from 2001 to 2016 in FORWARD–The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases. Disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were categorized into three groups: (1) csDMARDs (bDMARD‐naïve; reference), (2) tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis), and (3) non‐TNFi biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and anakinra). SIs were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization or those resulting in death. We calculated the propensity score (PS), which reflected the probability of receiving a specific DMARD group, and estimated the hazard ratio (HR) (with the 95% confidence interval [CI]) for SI from multivariable Cox models, adjusting for PS and time‐varying confounders. RESULTS: A total of 694 (5.9%) first SIs were identified in 11 623 patients with RA during 27 552 patient‐years of follow‐up. The SI incidence rate per 1000 patient‐years was 22.4 (95% CI 19.2‐26.1) for csDMARDs, 26.9 (95% CI 24.5‐29.6) for TNFis, and 23.3 (95% CI 19.0‐28.5) for non‐TNFi bDMARDs. Adjusted HRs for SIs were 1.33 (95% CI 1.05‐1.68) for TNFis and 1.48 (95% CI 1.02‐2.16) for non‐TNFi bDMARDs, compared with csDMARDs. The SI risk with non‐TNFi bDMARDs versus TNFis was not different. Other risk factors for SI were older age, higher comorbidity burden (particularly pulmonary disease), higher weighted cumulative prednisone dose, disability and disease activity, and number of prior csDMARD failures. CONCLUSION: TNFis and non‐TNFi bDMARDs were associated with an increased SI risk compared with csDMARDs in RA, even after accounting for risk‐associated patient characteristics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6858027/ /pubmed/31777822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11064 Text en © 2019, The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ozen, Gulsen
Pedro, Sofia
England, Bryant R.
Mehta, Bella
Wolfe, Frederick
Michaud, Kaleb
Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_full Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_fullStr Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_short Risk of Serious Infection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
title_sort risk of serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic versus nonbiologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11064
work_keys_str_mv AT ozengulsen riskofseriousinfectioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritistreatedwithbiologicversusnonbiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT pedrosofia riskofseriousinfectioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritistreatedwithbiologicversusnonbiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT englandbryantr riskofseriousinfectioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritistreatedwithbiologicversusnonbiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT mehtabella riskofseriousinfectioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritistreatedwithbiologicversusnonbiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT wolfefrederick riskofseriousinfectioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritistreatedwithbiologicversusnonbiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs
AT michaudkaleb riskofseriousinfectioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritistreatedwithbiologicversusnonbiologicdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugs