Cargando…

Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE: Pseudostenosis is a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) artifact that mimics arterial stenosis. The study objective was to compare imaging and clinical aspects of stenosis and pseudostenosis in a cohort of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant‐cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu&#...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marinelli, Kathleen C., Ahlman, Mark A., Quinn, Kaitlin A., Malayeri, Ashkan A., Evers, Robert, Grayson, Peter C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.1018
_version_ 1783470874733576192
author Marinelli, Kathleen C.
Ahlman, Mark A.
Quinn, Kaitlin A.
Malayeri, Ashkan A.
Evers, Robert
Grayson, Peter C.
author_facet Marinelli, Kathleen C.
Ahlman, Mark A.
Quinn, Kaitlin A.
Malayeri, Ashkan A.
Evers, Robert
Grayson, Peter C.
author_sort Marinelli, Kathleen C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Pseudostenosis is a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) artifact that mimics arterial stenosis. The study objective was to compare imaging and clinical aspects of stenosis and pseudostenosis in a cohort of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant‐cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). METHODS: Patients with LVV and comparator conditions (healthy or vasculopathies) underwent MRA of the aortic arch vessels. The subclavian and axillary arteries were systematically assessed for presence of stenosis and pseudostenosis by two independent readers. Serial and delayed imaging and clinical assessments were used to confirm suspected pseudostenoses. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associations between angiographic pathology and clinical findings. RESULTS: One hundred eighty‐four MRA scans were analyzed from patients with GCA (n = 36), TAK (n = 47), and comparators (n = 25). Pseudostenoses were frequently observed (48 of 184 scans, 26%) in the distal subclavian artery only on the side of injection and were shorter in length compared with true stenoses (25 mm vs 78 mm, P < 0.01). There was no difference in prevalence of pseudostenosis by diagnosis (GCA = 33%, TAK = 23%, comparator = 20%, P = 0.44), disease activity status (P = 0.31), or treatment status (P = 1.00). Percent and length of true stenosis were independently associated with pulse and blood pressure abnormalities in the upper extremity. Adjusting for length and stenosis degree, absence of collateral arteries was associated with arm claudication (odds ratio = 2.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Although a pseudostenosis could be falsely interpreted as an arterial stenosis, radiographic and associated clinical features can help distinguish true disease from arterial susceptibility artifacts. In addition, the peripheral vascular examination can help to confirm a suspected true stenosis, as specific aspects of angiographic pathology are associated with vascular examination abnormalities in LVV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68580462019-11-27 Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis Marinelli, Kathleen C. Ahlman, Mark A. Quinn, Kaitlin A. Malayeri, Ashkan A. Evers, Robert Grayson, Peter C. ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Pseudostenosis is a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) artifact that mimics arterial stenosis. The study objective was to compare imaging and clinical aspects of stenosis and pseudostenosis in a cohort of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant‐cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). METHODS: Patients with LVV and comparator conditions (healthy or vasculopathies) underwent MRA of the aortic arch vessels. The subclavian and axillary arteries were systematically assessed for presence of stenosis and pseudostenosis by two independent readers. Serial and delayed imaging and clinical assessments were used to confirm suspected pseudostenoses. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associations between angiographic pathology and clinical findings. RESULTS: One hundred eighty‐four MRA scans were analyzed from patients with GCA (n = 36), TAK (n = 47), and comparators (n = 25). Pseudostenoses were frequently observed (48 of 184 scans, 26%) in the distal subclavian artery only on the side of injection and were shorter in length compared with true stenoses (25 mm vs 78 mm, P < 0.01). There was no difference in prevalence of pseudostenosis by diagnosis (GCA = 33%, TAK = 23%, comparator = 20%, P = 0.44), disease activity status (P = 0.31), or treatment status (P = 1.00). Percent and length of true stenosis were independently associated with pulse and blood pressure abnormalities in the upper extremity. Adjusting for length and stenosis degree, absence of collateral arteries was associated with arm claudication (odds ratio = 2.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Although a pseudostenosis could be falsely interpreted as an arterial stenosis, radiographic and associated clinical features can help distinguish true disease from arterial susceptibility artifacts. In addition, the peripheral vascular examination can help to confirm a suspected true stenosis, as specific aspects of angiographic pathology are associated with vascular examination abnormalities in LVV. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6858046/ /pubmed/31750423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.1018 Text en Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Marinelli, Kathleen C.
Ahlman, Mark A.
Quinn, Kaitlin A.
Malayeri, Ashkan A.
Evers, Robert
Grayson, Peter C.
Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
title Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
title_full Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
title_fullStr Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
title_full_unstemmed Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
title_short Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
title_sort stenosis and pseudostenosis of the upper extremity arteries in large‐vessel vasculitis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.1018
work_keys_str_mv AT marinellikathleenc stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis
AT ahlmanmarka stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis
AT quinnkaitlina stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis
AT malayeriashkana stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis
AT eversrobert stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis
AT graysonpeterc stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis