Cargando…
Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis
OBJECTIVE: Pseudostenosis is a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) artifact that mimics arterial stenosis. The study objective was to compare imaging and clinical aspects of stenosis and pseudostenosis in a cohort of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant‐cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.1018 |
_version_ | 1783470874733576192 |
---|---|
author | Marinelli, Kathleen C. Ahlman, Mark A. Quinn, Kaitlin A. Malayeri, Ashkan A. Evers, Robert Grayson, Peter C. |
author_facet | Marinelli, Kathleen C. Ahlman, Mark A. Quinn, Kaitlin A. Malayeri, Ashkan A. Evers, Robert Grayson, Peter C. |
author_sort | Marinelli, Kathleen C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Pseudostenosis is a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) artifact that mimics arterial stenosis. The study objective was to compare imaging and clinical aspects of stenosis and pseudostenosis in a cohort of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant‐cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). METHODS: Patients with LVV and comparator conditions (healthy or vasculopathies) underwent MRA of the aortic arch vessels. The subclavian and axillary arteries were systematically assessed for presence of stenosis and pseudostenosis by two independent readers. Serial and delayed imaging and clinical assessments were used to confirm suspected pseudostenoses. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associations between angiographic pathology and clinical findings. RESULTS: One hundred eighty‐four MRA scans were analyzed from patients with GCA (n = 36), TAK (n = 47), and comparators (n = 25). Pseudostenoses were frequently observed (48 of 184 scans, 26%) in the distal subclavian artery only on the side of injection and were shorter in length compared with true stenoses (25 mm vs 78 mm, P < 0.01). There was no difference in prevalence of pseudostenosis by diagnosis (GCA = 33%, TAK = 23%, comparator = 20%, P = 0.44), disease activity status (P = 0.31), or treatment status (P = 1.00). Percent and length of true stenosis were independently associated with pulse and blood pressure abnormalities in the upper extremity. Adjusting for length and stenosis degree, absence of collateral arteries was associated with arm claudication (odds ratio = 2.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Although a pseudostenosis could be falsely interpreted as an arterial stenosis, radiographic and associated clinical features can help distinguish true disease from arterial susceptibility artifacts. In addition, the peripheral vascular examination can help to confirm a suspected true stenosis, as specific aspects of angiographic pathology are associated with vascular examination abnormalities in LVV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68580462019-11-27 Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis Marinelli, Kathleen C. Ahlman, Mark A. Quinn, Kaitlin A. Malayeri, Ashkan A. Evers, Robert Grayson, Peter C. ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Pseudostenosis is a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) artifact that mimics arterial stenosis. The study objective was to compare imaging and clinical aspects of stenosis and pseudostenosis in a cohort of large‐vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant‐cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). METHODS: Patients with LVV and comparator conditions (healthy or vasculopathies) underwent MRA of the aortic arch vessels. The subclavian and axillary arteries were systematically assessed for presence of stenosis and pseudostenosis by two independent readers. Serial and delayed imaging and clinical assessments were used to confirm suspected pseudostenoses. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associations between angiographic pathology and clinical findings. RESULTS: One hundred eighty‐four MRA scans were analyzed from patients with GCA (n = 36), TAK (n = 47), and comparators (n = 25). Pseudostenoses were frequently observed (48 of 184 scans, 26%) in the distal subclavian artery only on the side of injection and were shorter in length compared with true stenoses (25 mm vs 78 mm, P < 0.01). There was no difference in prevalence of pseudostenosis by diagnosis (GCA = 33%, TAK = 23%, comparator = 20%, P = 0.44), disease activity status (P = 0.31), or treatment status (P = 1.00). Percent and length of true stenosis were independently associated with pulse and blood pressure abnormalities in the upper extremity. Adjusting for length and stenosis degree, absence of collateral arteries was associated with arm claudication (odds ratio = 2.37, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Although a pseudostenosis could be falsely interpreted as an arterial stenosis, radiographic and associated clinical features can help distinguish true disease from arterial susceptibility artifacts. In addition, the peripheral vascular examination can help to confirm a suspected true stenosis, as specific aspects of angiographic pathology are associated with vascular examination abnormalities in LVV. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6858046/ /pubmed/31750423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.1018 Text en Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Marinelli, Kathleen C. Ahlman, Mark A. Quinn, Kaitlin A. Malayeri, Ashkan A. Evers, Robert Grayson, Peter C. Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis |
title | Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis |
title_full | Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis |
title_fullStr | Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis |
title_short | Stenosis and Pseudostenosis of the Upper Extremity Arteries in Large‐Vessel Vasculitis |
title_sort | stenosis and pseudostenosis of the upper extremity arteries in large‐vessel vasculitis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31750423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.1018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinellikathleenc stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis AT ahlmanmarka stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis AT quinnkaitlina stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis AT malayeriashkana stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis AT eversrobert stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis AT graysonpeterc stenosisandpseudostenosisoftheupperextremityarteriesinlargevesselvasculitis |