Cargando…

Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Fever is an integral part of the inflammatory response and has therefore likely a physiological role in fighting infections. Nevertheless, whether fever in itself is beneficial or harmful in adults is unknown. This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the beneficial and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sethi, Naqash, Naqash, Arushma Imran, Nielsen, Niklas, Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31685514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032389
_version_ 1783470879782469632
author Sethi, Naqash
Naqash, Arushma Imran
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
author_facet Sethi, Naqash
Naqash, Arushma Imran
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
author_sort Sethi, Naqash
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fever is an integral part of the inflammatory response and has therefore likely a physiological role in fighting infections. Nevertheless, whether fever in itself is beneficial or harmful in adults is unknown. This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the beneficial and harmful effects of fever control interventions in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol for a systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane, GRADE and the eight-step assessment suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues for better validation of meta-analytical results in systematic reviews. We plan to include all relevant randomised clinical trials comparing any fever control intervention with placebo, sham or no intervention in adults. We plan to search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection to identify relevant trials. Any eligible trial will be assessed and classified as either at high risk of bias or low risk of bias, and our primary conclusions will be based on trials at low risk of bias. We will perform our meta-analyses of the extracted data using Review Manager 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis. For all our outcomes, we will create a ‘Summary of Findings’ table based on GRADE assessments of the certainty of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal approval or review of ethics is required for this systematic review as individual patient data will not be included. This systematic review has the potential to highlight (1) whether one should believe fever to be beneficial, harmful or neither in adults; (2) the existing knowledge gaps on this topic; and (3) whether the recommendations from guidelines and daily clinical practice are correct. These results will be disseminated through publication in a leading peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019134006
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68580942019-12-03 Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis Sethi, Naqash Naqash, Arushma Imran Nielsen, Niklas Jakobsen, Janus Christian BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Fever is an integral part of the inflammatory response and has therefore likely a physiological role in fighting infections. Nevertheless, whether fever in itself is beneficial or harmful in adults is unknown. This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the beneficial and harmful effects of fever control interventions in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol for a systematic review was conducted following the recommendations of Cochrane, GRADE and the eight-step assessment suggested by Jakobsen and colleagues for better validation of meta-analytical results in systematic reviews. We plan to include all relevant randomised clinical trials comparing any fever control intervention with placebo, sham or no intervention in adults. We plan to search CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection to identify relevant trials. Any eligible trial will be assessed and classified as either at high risk of bias or low risk of bias, and our primary conclusions will be based on trials at low risk of bias. We will perform our meta-analyses of the extracted data using Review Manager 5.3 and Trial Sequential Analysis. For all our outcomes, we will create a ‘Summary of Findings’ table based on GRADE assessments of the certainty of the evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal approval or review of ethics is required for this systematic review as individual patient data will not be included. This systematic review has the potential to highlight (1) whether one should believe fever to be beneficial, harmful or neither in adults; (2) the existing knowledge gaps on this topic; and (3) whether the recommendations from guidelines and daily clinical practice are correct. These results will be disseminated through publication in a leading peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019134006 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6858094/ /pubmed/31685514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032389 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Sethi, Naqash
Naqash, Arushma Imran
Nielsen, Niklas
Jakobsen, Janus Christian
Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_fullStr Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_short Fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_sort fever control interventions versus placebo, sham or no intervention in adults: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31685514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032389
work_keys_str_mv AT sethinaqash fevercontrolinterventionsversusplaceboshamornointerventioninadultsaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT naqasharushmaimran fevercontrolinterventionsversusplaceboshamornointerventioninadultsaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT nielsenniklas fevercontrolinterventionsversusplaceboshamornointerventioninadultsaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT jakobsenjanuschristian fevercontrolinterventionsversusplaceboshamornointerventioninadultsaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis