Cargando…
Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Difficult airway management during tracheal intubation can lead to severe hypoxic sequelae. Routine intubation practice is to use a strict supine position, whereas a 25° head-up or reverse Trendelenburg position increases efficacy of preoxygenation, seems more comfortable for the anaes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31685496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029761 |
_version_ | 1783470880035176448 |
---|---|
author | Falempin, Anne-Sophie Pereira, Bruno Binakdane, Fatima Bazin, Jean-Etienne Smirdec, Margot |
author_facet | Falempin, Anne-Sophie Pereira, Bruno Binakdane, Fatima Bazin, Jean-Etienne Smirdec, Margot |
author_sort | Falempin, Anne-Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Difficult airway management during tracheal intubation can lead to severe hypoxic sequelae. Routine intubation practice is to use a strict supine position, whereas a 25° head-up or reverse Trendelenburg position increases efficacy of preoxygenation, seems more comfortable for the anaesthetist and may also provide better intubation conditions in direct laryngoscopy. The 25° head-up position could be used for the whole population rather than only for obese patients, but there is no prospective randomised controlled trial with a robust design and large number of patients comparing strict supine against 25° intubation in operating room. The objective of the InSize25 study is to test the effect of these two patient positions on intubation conditions during laryngoscopy in scheduled surgery on non-obese patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: InSize25 is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. The InSize25 study will randomise 1000 adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring intubation with neuromuscular-blocking drugs, candidates for direct laryngoscopy. The primary outcome variable is the view obtained during the first laryngoscopy without any external manipulation assessed using percentage of glottic opening. Important secondary outcomes are: Cormack-Lehane classification, number of attempts at laryngoscopy and at tracheal intubation, use of ancillary equipment (eg, bougies, alternative laryngoscope blades, videolaryngoscope) and manoeuvres (eg, laryngeal manipulation), comfort score for the anaesthetist, episodes of postinduction hypotension or desaturation and mechanical complications of intubation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial received appropriate approval from the ‘CPP Sud-Est II’ ethical review board. Informed consent is required. If the 25° head-up position proves superior for tracheal intubation without more complications, it may become the routine-standard intubation position rather than only for use with obese patients. The final results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier (NCT03339141). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68580952019-12-03 Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol Falempin, Anne-Sophie Pereira, Bruno Binakdane, Fatima Bazin, Jean-Etienne Smirdec, Margot BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Difficult airway management during tracheal intubation can lead to severe hypoxic sequelae. Routine intubation practice is to use a strict supine position, whereas a 25° head-up or reverse Trendelenburg position increases efficacy of preoxygenation, seems more comfortable for the anaesthetist and may also provide better intubation conditions in direct laryngoscopy. The 25° head-up position could be used for the whole population rather than only for obese patients, but there is no prospective randomised controlled trial with a robust design and large number of patients comparing strict supine against 25° intubation in operating room. The objective of the InSize25 study is to test the effect of these two patient positions on intubation conditions during laryngoscopy in scheduled surgery on non-obese patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: InSize25 is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. The InSize25 study will randomise 1000 adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring intubation with neuromuscular-blocking drugs, candidates for direct laryngoscopy. The primary outcome variable is the view obtained during the first laryngoscopy without any external manipulation assessed using percentage of glottic opening. Important secondary outcomes are: Cormack-Lehane classification, number of attempts at laryngoscopy and at tracheal intubation, use of ancillary equipment (eg, bougies, alternative laryngoscope blades, videolaryngoscope) and manoeuvres (eg, laryngeal manipulation), comfort score for the anaesthetist, episodes of postinduction hypotension or desaturation and mechanical complications of intubation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial received appropriate approval from the ‘CPP Sud-Est II’ ethical review board. Informed consent is required. If the 25° head-up position proves superior for tracheal intubation without more complications, it may become the routine-standard intubation position rather than only for use with obese patients. The final results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier (NCT03339141). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6858095/ /pubmed/31685496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029761 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesia Falempin, Anne-Sophie Pereira, Bruno Binakdane, Fatima Bazin, Jean-Etienne Smirdec, Margot Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol |
title | Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol |
title_full | Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol |
title_fullStr | Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol |
title_short | Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol |
title_sort | investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the insize25 study protocol |
topic | Anaesthesia |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31685496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT falempinannesophie investigatorinitiatedmulticentreopenlabeltwoarmrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingintubatingconditionsin25headuppositionandsupinetheinsize25studyprotocol AT pereirabruno investigatorinitiatedmulticentreopenlabeltwoarmrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingintubatingconditionsin25headuppositionandsupinetheinsize25studyprotocol AT binakdanefatima investigatorinitiatedmulticentreopenlabeltwoarmrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingintubatingconditionsin25headuppositionandsupinetheinsize25studyprotocol AT bazinjeanetienne investigatorinitiatedmulticentreopenlabeltwoarmrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingintubatingconditionsin25headuppositionandsupinetheinsize25studyprotocol AT smirdecmargot investigatorinitiatedmulticentreopenlabeltwoarmrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingintubatingconditionsin25headuppositionandsupinetheinsize25studyprotocol |