Cargando…
Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) can be challenging given the large overlap of symptoms, commonly leading to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. In order to strengthen the differential diagnosis of headache, previous studies have evaluated the util...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031587 |
_version_ | 1783470882696462336 |
---|---|
author | Anarte, Ernesto Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela Schwarz, Annika Luedtke, Kerstin Falla, Deborah |
author_facet | Anarte, Ernesto Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela Schwarz, Annika Luedtke, Kerstin Falla, Deborah |
author_sort | Anarte, Ernesto |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) can be challenging given the large overlap of symptoms, commonly leading to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. In order to strengthen the differential diagnosis of headache, previous studies have evaluated the utility of physical tests to examine for musculoskeletal impairment, mainly in the cervical spine, which could be provoking or triggering headache. However, no systematic review has attempted to evaluate whether physical tests can differentiate CGH from migraine or both conditions from asymptomatic subjects. METHODS/ANALYSIS: A systematic review protocol has been designed and is reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). A sensitive topic-based search strategy is planned which will include databases, hand searching of key journals and consultation of relevant leading authors in this field. Terms and keywords will be selected after discussion and agreement. Two independent reviewers will perform the search and select studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, including any cohort or observational studies evaluating the topic of this review; a third reviewer will confirm accuracy. A narrative synthesis will be developed for all included studies and, if possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. The overall quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies and the Downs and Black scale for those studies where the QUADAS-2 checklist cannot be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since no patient information will be collected. The results will provide a deeper understanding about the possibility of using physical tests to differentiate cervicogenic headache from migraine and from asymptomatic subjects, which has direct relevance for clinicians managing people with headache. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135269. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68581062019-12-03 Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review Anarte, Ernesto Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela Schwarz, Annika Luedtke, Kerstin Falla, Deborah BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) can be challenging given the large overlap of symptoms, commonly leading to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. In order to strengthen the differential diagnosis of headache, previous studies have evaluated the utility of physical tests to examine for musculoskeletal impairment, mainly in the cervical spine, which could be provoking or triggering headache. However, no systematic review has attempted to evaluate whether physical tests can differentiate CGH from migraine or both conditions from asymptomatic subjects. METHODS/ANALYSIS: A systematic review protocol has been designed and is reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). A sensitive topic-based search strategy is planned which will include databases, hand searching of key journals and consultation of relevant leading authors in this field. Terms and keywords will be selected after discussion and agreement. Two independent reviewers will perform the search and select studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, including any cohort or observational studies evaluating the topic of this review; a third reviewer will confirm accuracy. A narrative synthesis will be developed for all included studies and, if possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. The overall quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies and the Downs and Black scale for those studies where the QUADAS-2 checklist cannot be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since no patient information will be collected. The results will provide a deeper understanding about the possibility of using physical tests to differentiate cervicogenic headache from migraine and from asymptomatic subjects, which has direct relevance for clinicians managing people with headache. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135269. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6858106/ /pubmed/31712341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031587 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Anarte, Ernesto Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela Schwarz, Annika Luedtke, Kerstin Falla, Deborah Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review |
title | Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? a protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anarteernesto canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview AT ferreiracarvalhogabriela canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview AT schwarzannika canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview AT luedtkekerstin canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview AT falladeborah canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview |