Cargando…

Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) can be challenging given the large overlap of symptoms, commonly leading to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. In order to strengthen the differential diagnosis of headache, previous studies have evaluated the util...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anarte, Ernesto, Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela, Schwarz, Annika, Luedtke, Kerstin, Falla, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031587
_version_ 1783470882696462336
author Anarte, Ernesto
Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela
Schwarz, Annika
Luedtke, Kerstin
Falla, Deborah
author_facet Anarte, Ernesto
Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela
Schwarz, Annika
Luedtke, Kerstin
Falla, Deborah
author_sort Anarte, Ernesto
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) can be challenging given the large overlap of symptoms, commonly leading to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. In order to strengthen the differential diagnosis of headache, previous studies have evaluated the utility of physical tests to examine for musculoskeletal impairment, mainly in the cervical spine, which could be provoking or triggering headache. However, no systematic review has attempted to evaluate whether physical tests can differentiate CGH from migraine or both conditions from asymptomatic subjects. METHODS/ANALYSIS: A systematic review protocol has been designed and is reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). A sensitive topic-based search strategy is planned which will include databases, hand searching of key journals and consultation of relevant leading authors in this field. Terms and keywords will be selected after discussion and agreement. Two independent reviewers will perform the search and select studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, including any cohort or observational studies evaluating the topic of this review; a third reviewer will confirm accuracy. A narrative synthesis will be developed for all included studies and, if possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. The overall quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies and the Downs and Black scale for those studies where the QUADAS-2 checklist cannot be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since no patient information will be collected. The results will provide a deeper understanding about the possibility of using physical tests to differentiate cervicogenic headache from migraine and from asymptomatic subjects, which has direct relevance for clinicians managing people with headache. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135269.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68581062019-12-03 Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review Anarte, Ernesto Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela Schwarz, Annika Luedtke, Kerstin Falla, Deborah BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Differential diagnosis of migraine and cervicogenic headache (CGH) can be challenging given the large overlap of symptoms, commonly leading to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. In order to strengthen the differential diagnosis of headache, previous studies have evaluated the utility of physical tests to examine for musculoskeletal impairment, mainly in the cervical spine, which could be provoking or triggering headache. However, no systematic review has attempted to evaluate whether physical tests can differentiate CGH from migraine or both conditions from asymptomatic subjects. METHODS/ANALYSIS: A systematic review protocol has been designed and is reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). A sensitive topic-based search strategy is planned which will include databases, hand searching of key journals and consultation of relevant leading authors in this field. Terms and keywords will be selected after discussion and agreement. Two independent reviewers will perform the search and select studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, including any cohort or observational studies evaluating the topic of this review; a third reviewer will confirm accuracy. A narrative synthesis will be developed for all included studies and, if possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. The overall quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies and the Downs and Black scale for those studies where the QUADAS-2 checklist cannot be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since no patient information will be collected. The results will provide a deeper understanding about the possibility of using physical tests to differentiate cervicogenic headache from migraine and from asymptomatic subjects, which has direct relevance for clinicians managing people with headache. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019135269. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6858106/ /pubmed/31712341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031587 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Anarte, Ernesto
Ferreira Carvalho, Gabriela
Schwarz, Annika
Luedtke, Kerstin
Falla, Deborah
Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
title Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
title_full Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
title_short Can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? A protocol for a systematic review
title_sort can physical testing be used to distinguish between migraine and cervicogenic headache sufferers? a protocol for a systematic review
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031587
work_keys_str_mv AT anarteernesto canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT ferreiracarvalhogabriela canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT schwarzannika canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT luedtkekerstin canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview
AT falladeborah canphysicaltestingbeusedtodistinguishbetweenmigraineandcervicogenicheadachesufferersaprotocolforasystematicreview