Cargando…
Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
OBJECTIVE: Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. DESIGN: Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029480 |
_version_ | 1783470884096311296 |
---|---|
author | Hackshaw-McGeagh, Lucy E Penfold, Chris Shingler, Ellie Robles, Luke A Perks, Claire M Holly, Jeff M P Rowe, Edward Koupparis, Anthony Bahl, Amit Persad, Raj Shiridzinomwa, Constance Johnson, Lyndsey Biernacka, Kalina M Frankow, Aleksandra Woodside, Jayne V Gilchrist, Sarah Oxley, Jon Abrams, Paul Lane, J Athene Martin, Richard M |
author_facet | Hackshaw-McGeagh, Lucy E Penfold, Chris Shingler, Ellie Robles, Luke A Perks, Claire M Holly, Jeff M P Rowe, Edward Koupparis, Anthony Bahl, Amit Persad, Raj Shiridzinomwa, Constance Johnson, Lyndsey Biernacka, Kalina M Frankow, Aleksandra Woodside, Jayne V Gilchrist, Sarah Oxley, Jon Abrams, Paul Lane, J Athene Martin, Richard M |
author_sort | Hackshaw-McGeagh, Lucy E |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. DESIGN: Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate. RANDOMISATION: Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system. INTERVENTIONS: Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months. BLINDING: Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%. RESULTS: 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completed the trial. Of 25 men in the nutrition intervention, 10 (40.0%; 95% CI 23.4% to 59.3%) adhered to the fruit and vegetable recommendations and 18 (72.0%; 95% CI 52.4% to 85.7%) to reduced dairy intake. Adherence to lycopene (n=28), was 78.6% (95% CI 60.5% to 89.8%), while 21/39 adhered to the walking intervention (53.8%; 95% CI 38.6% to 68.4%). Most men were followed up at 6 months (75/81; 92.6%). Three ‘possibly related’ adverse events were indigestion, abdominal bloating and knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions were deemed feasible, with high randomisation rates and generally good adherence. A definitive RCT is proposed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 99048944. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68581122019-12-03 Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Hackshaw-McGeagh, Lucy E Penfold, Chris Shingler, Ellie Robles, Luke A Perks, Claire M Holly, Jeff M P Rowe, Edward Koupparis, Anthony Bahl, Amit Persad, Raj Shiridzinomwa, Constance Johnson, Lyndsey Biernacka, Kalina M Frankow, Aleksandra Woodside, Jayne V Gilchrist, Sarah Oxley, Jon Abrams, Paul Lane, J Athene Martin, Richard M BMJ Open Urology OBJECTIVE: Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. DESIGN: Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate. RANDOMISATION: Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system. INTERVENTIONS: Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months. BLINDING: Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%. RESULTS: 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completed the trial. Of 25 men in the nutrition intervention, 10 (40.0%; 95% CI 23.4% to 59.3%) adhered to the fruit and vegetable recommendations and 18 (72.0%; 95% CI 52.4% to 85.7%) to reduced dairy intake. Adherence to lycopene (n=28), was 78.6% (95% CI 60.5% to 89.8%), while 21/39 adhered to the walking intervention (53.8%; 95% CI 38.6% to 68.4%). Most men were followed up at 6 months (75/81; 92.6%). Three ‘possibly related’ adverse events were indigestion, abdominal bloating and knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions were deemed feasible, with high randomisation rates and generally good adherence. A definitive RCT is proposed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 99048944. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6858112/ /pubmed/31699723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029480 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Urology Hackshaw-McGeagh, Lucy E Penfold, Chris Shingler, Ellie Robles, Luke A Perks, Claire M Holly, Jeff M P Rowe, Edward Koupparis, Anthony Bahl, Amit Persad, Raj Shiridzinomwa, Constance Johnson, Lyndsey Biernacka, Kalina M Frankow, Aleksandra Woodside, Jayne V Gilchrist, Sarah Oxley, Jon Abrams, Paul Lane, J Athene Martin, Richard M Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
title | Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
title_full | Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
title_short | Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
title_sort | phase ii randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hackshawmcgeaghlucye phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT penfoldchris phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT shinglerellie phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT robleslukea phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT perksclairem phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT hollyjeffmp phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT roweedward phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT koupparisanthony phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT bahlamit phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT persadraj phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT shiridzinomwaconstance phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT johnsonlyndsey phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT biernackakalinam phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT frankowaleksandra phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT woodsidejaynev phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT gilchristsarah phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT oxleyjon phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT abramspaul phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT lanejathene phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer AT martinrichardm phaseiirandomisedcontrolfeasibilitytrialofanutritionandphysicalactivityinterventionafterradicalprostatectomyforprostatecancer |