Cargando…

Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to understand the impact of integrating a fee waiver for the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) 1000 cash transfer programme on health insurance enrolment. SETTING: The study was conducted in five districts i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palermo, Tia M, Valli, Elsa, Ángeles-Tagliaferro, Gustavo, de Milliano, Marlous, Adamba, Clement, Spadafora, Tayllor Renee, Barrington, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31690603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028726
_version_ 1783470895123136512
author Palermo, Tia M
Valli, Elsa
Ángeles-Tagliaferro, Gustavo
de Milliano, Marlous
Adamba, Clement
Spadafora, Tayllor Renee
Barrington, Clare
author_facet Palermo, Tia M
Valli, Elsa
Ángeles-Tagliaferro, Gustavo
de Milliano, Marlous
Adamba, Clement
Spadafora, Tayllor Renee
Barrington, Clare
author_sort Palermo, Tia M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to understand the impact of integrating a fee waiver for the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) 1000 cash transfer programme on health insurance enrolment. SETTING: The study was conducted in five districts implementing Ghana’s LEAP 1000 programme in Northern and Upper East Regions. PARTICIPANTS: Women, from LEAP households, who were pregnant or had a child under 1 year and who participated in baseline and 24-month surveys (2497) participated in the study. INTERVENTION: LEAP provides bimonthly cash payments combined with a premium waiver for enrolment in NHIS to extremely poor households with orphans and vulnerable children, elderly with no productive capacity and persons with severe disability. LEAP 1000, the focus of the current evaluation, expanded eligibility in 2015 to those households with a pregnant woman or child under the age of 12 months. Over the course of the study, households received 13 payments. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included current and ever enrolment in NHIS. Secondary outcomes include reasons for not enrolling in NHIS. We conducted a mixed-methods impact evaluation using a quasi-experimental design and estimated intent-to-treat impacts on health insurance enrolment among children and adults. Longitudinal qualitative interviews were conducted with an embedded cohort of 20 women and analysed using systematic thematic coding. RESULTS: Current enrolment increased among the treatment group from 37.4% to 46.6% (n=5523) and decreased among the comparison group from 37.3% to 33.3% (n=4804), resulting in programme impacts of 14 (95% CI 7.8 to 20.5) to 15 (95% CI 10.6 to 18.5) percentage points for current NHIS enrolment. Common reasons for not enrolling were fees and travel. CONCLUSION: While impacts on NHIS enrolment were significant, gaps remain to maximise the potential of integrated programming. NHIS and LEAP could be better streamlined to ensure poor households fully benefit from both services, in a further step towards integrated social protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-55942496d53af.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68581572019-12-03 Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme Palermo, Tia M Valli, Elsa Ángeles-Tagliaferro, Gustavo de Milliano, Marlous Adamba, Clement Spadafora, Tayllor Renee Barrington, Clare BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to understand the impact of integrating a fee waiver for the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) with Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) 1000 cash transfer programme on health insurance enrolment. SETTING: The study was conducted in five districts implementing Ghana’s LEAP 1000 programme in Northern and Upper East Regions. PARTICIPANTS: Women, from LEAP households, who were pregnant or had a child under 1 year and who participated in baseline and 24-month surveys (2497) participated in the study. INTERVENTION: LEAP provides bimonthly cash payments combined with a premium waiver for enrolment in NHIS to extremely poor households with orphans and vulnerable children, elderly with no productive capacity and persons with severe disability. LEAP 1000, the focus of the current evaluation, expanded eligibility in 2015 to those households with a pregnant woman or child under the age of 12 months. Over the course of the study, households received 13 payments. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included current and ever enrolment in NHIS. Secondary outcomes include reasons for not enrolling in NHIS. We conducted a mixed-methods impact evaluation using a quasi-experimental design and estimated intent-to-treat impacts on health insurance enrolment among children and adults. Longitudinal qualitative interviews were conducted with an embedded cohort of 20 women and analysed using systematic thematic coding. RESULTS: Current enrolment increased among the treatment group from 37.4% to 46.6% (n=5523) and decreased among the comparison group from 37.3% to 33.3% (n=4804), resulting in programme impacts of 14 (95% CI 7.8 to 20.5) to 15 (95% CI 10.6 to 18.5) percentage points for current NHIS enrolment. Common reasons for not enrolling were fees and travel. CONCLUSION: While impacts on NHIS enrolment were significant, gaps remain to maximise the potential of integrated programming. NHIS and LEAP could be better streamlined to ensure poor households fully benefit from both services, in a further step towards integrated social protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RIDIE-STUDY-ID-55942496d53af. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6858157/ /pubmed/31690603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028726 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Palermo, Tia M
Valli, Elsa
Ángeles-Tagliaferro, Gustavo
de Milliano, Marlous
Adamba, Clement
Spadafora, Tayllor Renee
Barrington, Clare
Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
title Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
title_full Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
title_fullStr Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
title_full_unstemmed Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
title_short Impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme
title_sort impact evaluation of a social protection programme paired with fee waivers on enrolment in ghana’s national health insurance scheme
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31690603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028726
work_keys_str_mv AT palermotiam impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT vallielsa impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT angelestagliaferrogustavo impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT demillianomarlous impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT adambaclement impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT spadaforatayllorrenee impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT barringtonclare impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme
AT impactevaluationofasocialprotectionprogrammepairedwithfeewaiversonenrolmentinghanasnationalhealthinsurancescheme