Cargando…

Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: The risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (RCDIs) is high when treated with standard antibiotics therapy (SAT) alone. It is suggested that the addition of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) or bezlotoxumab after SAT reduces the risk of RCDI. In the absence of head-to-he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alhifany, Abdullah A, Almutairi, Abdulaali R, Almangour, Thamer A, Shahbar, Alaa N, Abraham, Ivo, Alessa, Mohammed, Alnezary, Faris S, Cheema, Ejaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031145
_version_ 1783470896305930240
author Alhifany, Abdullah A
Almutairi, Abdulaali R
Almangour, Thamer A
Shahbar, Alaa N
Abraham, Ivo
Alessa, Mohammed
Alnezary, Faris S
Cheema, Ejaz
author_facet Alhifany, Abdullah A
Almutairi, Abdulaali R
Almangour, Thamer A
Shahbar, Alaa N
Abraham, Ivo
Alessa, Mohammed
Alnezary, Faris S
Cheema, Ejaz
author_sort Alhifany, Abdullah A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (RCDIs) is high when treated with standard antibiotics therapy (SAT) alone. It is suggested that the addition of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) or bezlotoxumab after SAT reduces the risk of RCDI. In the absence of head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs), this review attempts to compare the efficacy and safety of bezlotoxumab with FMT in reducing the risk of RCDI in hospitalised patients. DESIGN: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: A comprehensive search from inception to 30 February 2019 was conducted in four databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs reporting the resolution of diarrhoea associated with RCDI without relapse for at least 60 days after the end of treatments as the primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted author, year of publication, study design and binomial data that represented the resolution of diarrhoea or adverse events of monoclonal antibodies and FMT infusion. Random-effects models were used for resolution rate of RCDI and adverse events. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. RESULTS: Out of 1003 articles identified, seven RCTs involving 3043 patients contributed to the review. No difference was reported between single or multiple infusions of FMT and bezlotoxumab in resolving RCDI, (OR 1.53, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.39 to 5.16) and (OR 2.86, 95% CrI 1.29 to 6.57), respectively. Patients treated with SAT alone or bezlotoxumab with SAT showed significantly lower rates of diarrhoea than FMT (OR 0, 95% CrI 0 to 0.09) and (OR 0, 95% CrI 0 to 0.19), respectively. There was no difference in terms of other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first network meta-analysis that has compared the recently Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody bezlotoxumab with FMT for resolving RCDI. The quality of the included RCTs was variable. The findings of this study suggested no difference between single or multiple infusions of FMT and bezlotoxumab. However, FMT was associated with a higher rate of non-serious diarrhoea as opposed to SAT used alone or in combination with bezlotoxumab.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68581622019-12-03 Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Alhifany, Abdullah A Almutairi, Abdulaali R Almangour, Thamer A Shahbar, Alaa N Abraham, Ivo Alessa, Mohammed Alnezary, Faris S Cheema, Ejaz BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: The risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (RCDIs) is high when treated with standard antibiotics therapy (SAT) alone. It is suggested that the addition of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) or bezlotoxumab after SAT reduces the risk of RCDI. In the absence of head-to-head randomised controlled trials (RCTs), this review attempts to compare the efficacy and safety of bezlotoxumab with FMT in reducing the risk of RCDI in hospitalised patients. DESIGN: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: A comprehensive search from inception to 30 February 2019 was conducted in four databases (Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs reporting the resolution of diarrhoea associated with RCDI without relapse for at least 60 days after the end of treatments as the primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted author, year of publication, study design and binomial data that represented the resolution of diarrhoea or adverse events of monoclonal antibodies and FMT infusion. Random-effects models were used for resolution rate of RCDI and adverse events. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. RESULTS: Out of 1003 articles identified, seven RCTs involving 3043 patients contributed to the review. No difference was reported between single or multiple infusions of FMT and bezlotoxumab in resolving RCDI, (OR 1.53, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.39 to 5.16) and (OR 2.86, 95% CrI 1.29 to 6.57), respectively. Patients treated with SAT alone or bezlotoxumab with SAT showed significantly lower rates of diarrhoea than FMT (OR 0, 95% CrI 0 to 0.09) and (OR 0, 95% CrI 0 to 0.19), respectively. There was no difference in terms of other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first network meta-analysis that has compared the recently Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody bezlotoxumab with FMT for resolving RCDI. The quality of the included RCTs was variable. The findings of this study suggested no difference between single or multiple infusions of FMT and bezlotoxumab. However, FMT was associated with a higher rate of non-serious diarrhoea as opposed to SAT used alone or in combination with bezlotoxumab. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6858162/ /pubmed/31699731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031145 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Alhifany, Abdullah A
Almutairi, Abdulaali R
Almangour, Thamer A
Shahbar, Alaa N
Abraham, Ivo
Alessa, Mohammed
Alnezary, Faris S
Cheema, Ejaz
Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31699731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031145
work_keys_str_mv AT alhifanyabdullaha comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT almutairiabdulaalir comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT almangourthamera comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT shahbaralaan comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT abrahamivo comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT alessamohammed comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT alnezaryfariss comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT cheemaejaz comparingtheefficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationwithbezlotoxumabinreducingtheriskofrecurrentclostridiumdifficileinfectionsasystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials