Cargando…

Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Vasoplegia is common and associated with a poor prognosis in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C therapy in combination with vitamin B(1) and glucocorticoid, as well as monotherapy in various doses, has been investigated as a treatment for the vasoplegic state in sepsis, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujii, Tomoko, Belletti, Alessandro, Carr, Anitra, Furukawa, Toshi A, Luethi, Nora, Putzu, Alessandro, Sartini, Chiara, Salanti, Georgia, Tsujimoto, Yasushi, Udy, Andrew A, Young, Paul J, Bellomo, Rinaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033458
_version_ 1783470898945196032
author Fujii, Tomoko
Belletti, Alessandro
Carr, Anitra
Furukawa, Toshi A
Luethi, Nora
Putzu, Alessandro
Sartini, Chiara
Salanti, Georgia
Tsujimoto, Yasushi
Udy, Andrew A
Young, Paul J
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_facet Fujii, Tomoko
Belletti, Alessandro
Carr, Anitra
Furukawa, Toshi A
Luethi, Nora
Putzu, Alessandro
Sartini, Chiara
Salanti, Georgia
Tsujimoto, Yasushi
Udy, Andrew A
Young, Paul J
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_sort Fujii, Tomoko
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vasoplegia is common and associated with a poor prognosis in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C therapy in combination with vitamin B(1) and glucocorticoid, as well as monotherapy in various doses, has been investigated as a treatment for the vasoplegic state in sepsis, through targeting the inflammatory cascade. However, the combination effect and the relative contribution of each drug have not been well evaluated. Furthermore, the best combination between the three agents is currently unknown. We are planning a systematic review (SR) with network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the different treatments and identify the combination with the most favourable effect on survival. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include all randomised controlled trials comparing any intervention using intravenous vitamin C, vitamin B(1) and/or glucocorticoid with another or with placebo in the treatment of sepsis. We are interested in comparing the following active interventions. Very high-dose vitamin C (≥12 g/day), high-dose vitamin C (≥6 g/day), vitamin C (<6 g/day); low-dose glucocorticoid (<400 mg/day of hydrocortisone (or equivalent)), vitamin B(1) and combinations of the drugs above. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up within 1 year but 90 days or longer postrandomisation. All relevant studies will be sought through database searches and trial registries. All reference selection and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. We will conduct a random-effects NMA to synthesise all evidence for each outcome and obtain a comprehensive ranking of all treatments. We will use the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and the mean ranks to rank the various interventions. To differentiate between the effect of combination therapies and the effect of a component, we will employ a component NMA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This SR does not require ethical approval. We will publish findings from this systematic review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and present these at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018103860.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68581732019-12-03 Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis Fujii, Tomoko Belletti, Alessandro Carr, Anitra Furukawa, Toshi A Luethi, Nora Putzu, Alessandro Sartini, Chiara Salanti, Georgia Tsujimoto, Yasushi Udy, Andrew A Young, Paul J Bellomo, Rinaldo BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Vasoplegia is common and associated with a poor prognosis in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Vitamin C therapy in combination with vitamin B(1) and glucocorticoid, as well as monotherapy in various doses, has been investigated as a treatment for the vasoplegic state in sepsis, through targeting the inflammatory cascade. However, the combination effect and the relative contribution of each drug have not been well evaluated. Furthermore, the best combination between the three agents is currently unknown. We are planning a systematic review (SR) with network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the different treatments and identify the combination with the most favourable effect on survival. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include all randomised controlled trials comparing any intervention using intravenous vitamin C, vitamin B(1) and/or glucocorticoid with another or with placebo in the treatment of sepsis. We are interested in comparing the following active interventions. Very high-dose vitamin C (≥12 g/day), high-dose vitamin C (≥6 g/day), vitamin C (<6 g/day); low-dose glucocorticoid (<400 mg/day of hydrocortisone (or equivalent)), vitamin B(1) and combinations of the drugs above. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up within 1 year but 90 days or longer postrandomisation. All relevant studies will be sought through database searches and trial registries. All reference selection and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. We will conduct a random-effects NMA to synthesise all evidence for each outcome and obtain a comprehensive ranking of all treatments. We will use the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and the mean ranks to rank the various interventions. To differentiate between the effect of combination therapies and the effect of a component, we will employ a component NMA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This SR does not require ethical approval. We will publish findings from this systematic review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and present these at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018103860. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6858173/ /pubmed/31722954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033458 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Fujii, Tomoko
Belletti, Alessandro
Carr, Anitra
Furukawa, Toshi A
Luethi, Nora
Putzu, Alessandro
Sartini, Chiara
Salanti, Georgia
Tsujimoto, Yasushi
Udy, Andrew A
Young, Paul J
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
title Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
title_full Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
title_short Vitamin C therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
title_sort vitamin c therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and a network meta-analysis
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31722954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033458
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiitomoko vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT bellettialessandro vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT carranitra vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT furukawatoshia vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT luethinora vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT putzualessandro vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT sartinichiara vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT salantigeorgia vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT tsujimotoyasushi vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT udyandrewa vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT youngpaulj vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis
AT bellomorinaldo vitaminctherapyforpatientswithsepsisorsepticshockaprotocolforasystematicreviewandanetworkmetaanalysis