Cargando…
Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment
OBJECTIVES: It is desirable that public preferences are established and incorporated in emergency healthcare reforms. The aim of this study was to investigate preferences for local versus centralised provision of all emergency medical services (EMS) and explore what individuals think are important c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966 |
_version_ | 1783470901655764992 |
---|---|
author | Bhattarai, Nawaraj Mcmeekin, Peter Price, Christopher I Vale, Luke |
author_facet | Bhattarai, Nawaraj Mcmeekin, Peter Price, Christopher I Vale, Luke |
author_sort | Bhattarai, Nawaraj |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: It is desirable that public preferences are established and incorporated in emergency healthcare reforms. The aim of this study was to investigate preferences for local versus centralised provision of all emergency medical services (EMS) and explore what individuals think are important considerations for EMS delivery. DESIGN: A discrete choice experiment was conducted. The attributes used in the choice scenarios were: travel time to the hospital, waiting time to be seen, length of stay in the hospital, risks of dying, readmission and opportunity for outpatient care after emergency treatment at a local hospital. SETTING: North East England. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were a randomly sampled general population, aged 16 years or above recruited from Healthwatch Northumberland network database of lay members and from clinical contact with Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust via Patient Experience Team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis used logistic regression modelling techniques to determine the preference of each attribute. Marginal rates of substitution between attributes were estimated to understand the trade-offs individuals were willing to make. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 148 people (62 completed a web and 86 a postal version). Respondents preferred shorter travel time to hospital, shorter waiting time, fewer number of days in hospital, low risk of death, low risk of readmission and outpatient follow-up care in their local hospital. However, individuals were willing to trade off increased travel time and waiting time for high-quality centralised care. Individuals were willing to travel 9 min more for a 1-day reduction in length of stay in the hospital, 38 min for a 1% reduction in risk of death and 112 min for having outpatient follow-up care at their local hospital. CONCLUSIONS: People value centralised EMS if it provides higher quality care and are willing to travel further and wait longer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68581842019-12-03 Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment Bhattarai, Nawaraj Mcmeekin, Peter Price, Christopher I Vale, Luke BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: It is desirable that public preferences are established and incorporated in emergency healthcare reforms. The aim of this study was to investigate preferences for local versus centralised provision of all emergency medical services (EMS) and explore what individuals think are important considerations for EMS delivery. DESIGN: A discrete choice experiment was conducted. The attributes used in the choice scenarios were: travel time to the hospital, waiting time to be seen, length of stay in the hospital, risks of dying, readmission and opportunity for outpatient care after emergency treatment at a local hospital. SETTING: North East England. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were a randomly sampled general population, aged 16 years or above recruited from Healthwatch Northumberland network database of lay members and from clinical contact with Northumbria Healthcare National Health Service Foundation Trust via Patient Experience Team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis used logistic regression modelling techniques to determine the preference of each attribute. Marginal rates of substitution between attributes were estimated to understand the trade-offs individuals were willing to make. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 148 people (62 completed a web and 86 a postal version). Respondents preferred shorter travel time to hospital, shorter waiting time, fewer number of days in hospital, low risk of death, low risk of readmission and outpatient follow-up care in their local hospital. However, individuals were willing to trade off increased travel time and waiting time for high-quality centralised care. Individuals were willing to travel 9 min more for a 1-day reduction in length of stay in the hospital, 38 min for a 1% reduction in risk of death and 112 min for having outpatient follow-up care at their local hospital. CONCLUSIONS: People value centralised EMS if it provides higher quality care and are willing to travel further and wait longer. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6858184/ /pubmed/31694847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Bhattarai, Nawaraj Mcmeekin, Peter Price, Christopher I Vale, Luke Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
title | Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
title_full | Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
title_fullStr | Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
title_short | Preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
title_sort | preferences for centralised emergency medical services: discrete choice experiment |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31694847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhattarainawaraj preferencesforcentralisedemergencymedicalservicesdiscretechoiceexperiment AT mcmeekinpeter preferencesforcentralisedemergencymedicalservicesdiscretechoiceexperiment AT pricechristopheri preferencesforcentralisedemergencymedicalservicesdiscretechoiceexperiment AT valeluke preferencesforcentralisedemergencymedicalservicesdiscretechoiceexperiment |