Cargando…

Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: The Pain Toolkit is a self-management tool for people with persistent pain. It is available for use worldwide in multiple formats. To date, no studies have investigated the effectiveness of this intervention. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Pain Toolkit in compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Findley, Gillian, Ryan, Cormac, Cartwright, Amy, Martin, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031266
_version_ 1783470909883940864
author Findley, Gillian
Ryan, Cormac
Cartwright, Amy
Martin, Denis
author_facet Findley, Gillian
Ryan, Cormac
Cartwright, Amy
Martin, Denis
author_sort Findley, Gillian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Pain Toolkit is a self-management tool for people with persistent pain. It is available for use worldwide in multiple formats. To date, no studies have investigated the effectiveness of this intervention. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Pain Toolkit in comparison with a simple education control for people with low back pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants who have been discharged from the North of England Regional Back Pain Pathway will be randomised using sealed, consecutively numbered opaque envelopes to receive either the Pain Toolkit and the Back Book (intervention group) or the Back Book only (control group). Both the therapist and the participant will be blind to group allocation. The primary outcome measure will be disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)). Secondary outcome measures will be pain (0–10 numerical scale), healthcare use (number of healthcare professional visits) and quality of life (EuroQol-5D). Outcome measures will be completed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Data will be analysed using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline values. A change of 10 points in the ODI will be considered a clinically important change. Additionally, a subsample of participants from the intervention group will undergo semistructured interviews to explore individuals’ experience of the Pain Toolkit. Participants will be asked questions about the ease of use and acceptability of the Pain Toolkit and also for how long they used the Toolkit. The qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for the study was given by the Health Research Authority and the North East Newcastle, North Tyneside 2 Regional Ethics Committee (reference 18/NE/0144) and Teesside University (reference 176/17). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentation at relevant patient groups, and local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03791164; Pre -results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68582172019-12-03 Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial Findley, Gillian Ryan, Cormac Cartwright, Amy Martin, Denis BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: The Pain Toolkit is a self-management tool for people with persistent pain. It is available for use worldwide in multiple formats. To date, no studies have investigated the effectiveness of this intervention. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Pain Toolkit in comparison with a simple education control for people with low back pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants who have been discharged from the North of England Regional Back Pain Pathway will be randomised using sealed, consecutively numbered opaque envelopes to receive either the Pain Toolkit and the Back Book (intervention group) or the Back Book only (control group). Both the therapist and the participant will be blind to group allocation. The primary outcome measure will be disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)). Secondary outcome measures will be pain (0–10 numerical scale), healthcare use (number of healthcare professional visits) and quality of life (EuroQol-5D). Outcome measures will be completed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Data will be analysed using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline values. A change of 10 points in the ODI will be considered a clinically important change. Additionally, a subsample of participants from the intervention group will undergo semistructured interviews to explore individuals’ experience of the Pain Toolkit. Participants will be asked questions about the ease of use and acceptability of the Pain Toolkit and also for how long they used the Toolkit. The qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval for the study was given by the Health Research Authority and the North East Newcastle, North Tyneside 2 Regional Ethics Committee (reference 18/NE/0144) and Teesside University (reference 176/17). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentation at relevant patient groups, and local, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03791164; Pre -results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6858217/ /pubmed/31712337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031266 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Findley, Gillian
Ryan, Cormac
Cartwright, Amy
Martin, Denis
Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
title Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_full Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_short Study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
title_sort study protocol for an investigation of the effectiveness of the pain toolkit for people with low back pain: double-blind randomised controlled trial
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031266
work_keys_str_mv AT findleygillian studyprotocolforaninvestigationoftheeffectivenessofthepaintoolkitforpeoplewithlowbackpaindoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ryancormac studyprotocolforaninvestigationoftheeffectivenessofthepaintoolkitforpeoplewithlowbackpaindoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cartwrightamy studyprotocolforaninvestigationoftheeffectivenessofthepaintoolkitforpeoplewithlowbackpaindoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martindenis studyprotocolforaninvestigationoftheeffectivenessofthepaintoolkitforpeoplewithlowbackpaindoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial