Cargando…
Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
OBJECTIVE: To investigate to what extent evidence from previous similar trials or systematic reviews was considered before conducting new trials. DESIGN: Cohort study of contemporary protocols for trials with ethical approval. METHODS: All protocols for randomised trials approved by the five ethical...
Autores principales: | Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, Ogden, Michelle C, Marquardsen, Mikkel, Vive, Jonas, Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl, Gøtzsche, Peter Christian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026661 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are investigators’ access to trial data and rights to publish restricted and are potential trial participants informed about this? A comparison of trial protocols and informed consent materials
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger S., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Protocol for a systematic scoping review of reasons given to justify the performance of randomised controlled trials
por: Dewar, Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Lived Experience Of Participants in an African RandomiseD trial (LEOPARD): protocol for an in-depth qualitative study within a multisite randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
por: Lawrence, David S, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Rationalisations for women-only randomised controlled trials in conditions that affect both sexes: a scoping review protocol
por: Matthewson, Ainsley, et al.
Publicado: (2021)