Cargando…

Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks

Labeled medical imaging data is scarce and expensive to generate. To achieve generalizable deep learning models large amounts of data are needed. Standard data augmentation is a method to increase generalizability and is routinely performed. Generative adversarial networks offer a novel method for d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandfort, Veit, Yan, Ke, Pickhardt, Perry J., Summers, Ronald M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31729403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52737-x
_version_ 1783470943239143424
author Sandfort, Veit
Yan, Ke
Pickhardt, Perry J.
Summers, Ronald M.
author_facet Sandfort, Veit
Yan, Ke
Pickhardt, Perry J.
Summers, Ronald M.
author_sort Sandfort, Veit
collection PubMed
description Labeled medical imaging data is scarce and expensive to generate. To achieve generalizable deep learning models large amounts of data are needed. Standard data augmentation is a method to increase generalizability and is routinely performed. Generative adversarial networks offer a novel method for data augmentation. We evaluate the use of CycleGAN for data augmentation in CT segmentation tasks. Using a large image database we trained a CycleGAN to transform contrast CT images into non-contrast images. We then used the trained CycleGAN to augment our training using these synthetic non-contrast images. We compared the segmentation performance of a U-Net trained on the original dataset compared to a U-Net trained on the combined dataset of original data and synthetic non-contrast images. We further evaluated the U-Net segmentation performance on two separate datasets: The original contrast CT dataset on which segmentations were created and a second dataset from a different hospital containing only non-contrast CTs. We refer to these 2 separate datasets as the in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, respectively. We show that in several CT segmentation tasks performance is improved significantly, especially in out-of-distribution (noncontrast CT) data. For example, when training the model with standard augmentation techniques, performance of segmentation of the kidneys on out-of-distribution non-contrast images was dramatically lower than for in-distribution data (Dice score of 0.09 vs. 0.94 for out-of-distribution vs. in-distribution data, respectively, p < 0.001). When the kidney model was trained with CycleGAN augmentation techniques, the out-of-distribution (non-contrast) performance increased dramatically (from a Dice score of 0.09 to 0.66, p < 0.001). Improvements for the liver and spleen were smaller, from 0.86 to 0.89 and 0.65 to 0.69, respectively. We believe this method will be valuable to medical imaging researchers to reduce manual segmentation effort and cost in CT imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68583652019-11-27 Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks Sandfort, Veit Yan, Ke Pickhardt, Perry J. Summers, Ronald M. Sci Rep Article Labeled medical imaging data is scarce and expensive to generate. To achieve generalizable deep learning models large amounts of data are needed. Standard data augmentation is a method to increase generalizability and is routinely performed. Generative adversarial networks offer a novel method for data augmentation. We evaluate the use of CycleGAN for data augmentation in CT segmentation tasks. Using a large image database we trained a CycleGAN to transform contrast CT images into non-contrast images. We then used the trained CycleGAN to augment our training using these synthetic non-contrast images. We compared the segmentation performance of a U-Net trained on the original dataset compared to a U-Net trained on the combined dataset of original data and synthetic non-contrast images. We further evaluated the U-Net segmentation performance on two separate datasets: The original contrast CT dataset on which segmentations were created and a second dataset from a different hospital containing only non-contrast CTs. We refer to these 2 separate datasets as the in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, respectively. We show that in several CT segmentation tasks performance is improved significantly, especially in out-of-distribution (noncontrast CT) data. For example, when training the model with standard augmentation techniques, performance of segmentation of the kidneys on out-of-distribution non-contrast images was dramatically lower than for in-distribution data (Dice score of 0.09 vs. 0.94 for out-of-distribution vs. in-distribution data, respectively, p < 0.001). When the kidney model was trained with CycleGAN augmentation techniques, the out-of-distribution (non-contrast) performance increased dramatically (from a Dice score of 0.09 to 0.66, p < 0.001). Improvements for the liver and spleen were smaller, from 0.86 to 0.89 and 0.65 to 0.69, respectively. We believe this method will be valuable to medical imaging researchers to reduce manual segmentation effort and cost in CT imaging. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6858365/ /pubmed/31729403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52737-x Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sandfort, Veit
Yan, Ke
Pickhardt, Perry J.
Summers, Ronald M.
Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks
title Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks
title_full Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks
title_fullStr Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks
title_full_unstemmed Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks
title_short Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (CycleGAN) to improve generalizability in CT segmentation tasks
title_sort data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (cyclegan) to improve generalizability in ct segmentation tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31729403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52737-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sandfortveit dataaugmentationusinggenerativeadversarialnetworkscyclegantoimprovegeneralizabilityinctsegmentationtasks
AT yanke dataaugmentationusinggenerativeadversarialnetworkscyclegantoimprovegeneralizabilityinctsegmentationtasks
AT pickhardtperryj dataaugmentationusinggenerativeadversarialnetworkscyclegantoimprovegeneralizabilityinctsegmentationtasks
AT summersronaldm dataaugmentationusinggenerativeadversarialnetworkscyclegantoimprovegeneralizabilityinctsegmentationtasks