Cargando…
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head
BACKGROUND: Several methods are available for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Core decompression with implantation is a widely-used treatment. However, no single implant is recognized as the most effective way to prevent disease progression. Silk has high strength and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2914-4 |
_version_ | 1783471003961131008 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Liangta Chen, Feiyan Wang, Siqun Wei, Yibing Huang, Gangyong Chen, Jie Shi, Jingsheng Naidu, Rajeev K. Xia, Jun Tao, Tiger H. |
author_facet | Huang, Liangta Chen, Feiyan Wang, Siqun Wei, Yibing Huang, Gangyong Chen, Jie Shi, Jingsheng Naidu, Rajeev K. Xia, Jun Tao, Tiger H. |
author_sort | Huang, Liangta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several methods are available for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Core decompression with implantation is a widely-used treatment. However, no single implant is recognized as the most effective way to prevent disease progression. Silk has high strength and resiliency. This study explored the possibility of a strong and resilient silk protein biomaterial as a new alternative implant. METHODS: We investigated the biomechanical properties of the silk protein material by regular compression, torsion, and three-point bending tests. We established three-dimensional finite element models of different degrees of femoral head osteonecrosis following simple core decompression, fibula implantation, porous tantalum rod implantation, and silk protein rod implantation. Finally, we compared the differences in displacement and surface stress under load at the femoral head weight-bearing areas between these models. RESULTS: The elastic modulus and shear modulus of the silk protein material was 0.49GPa and 0.66GPa, respectively. Three-dimensional finite element analyses demonstrated less displacement and surface stress at the femoral head weight-bearing areas following silk protein rod implantation compared to simple core decompression (p < 0.05), regardless of the extent of osteonecrosis. No differences were noted in the surface deformation or surface stress of the femoral head weight-bearing areas following silk protein rod, fibula or tantalum rod implantation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with simple core decompression, silk protein rod implantation demonstrated less displacement and surface stress at the femoral head weight-bearing area, but more than fibula or tantalum rod implantation. Similar effects on the surface stress of the femoral head between the silk rod, fibula and tantalum rod implantations, combined with additional modifiable properties support the use of silk protein as a suitable biomaterial in osteonecrosis surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68586862019-11-29 Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head Huang, Liangta Chen, Feiyan Wang, Siqun Wei, Yibing Huang, Gangyong Chen, Jie Shi, Jingsheng Naidu, Rajeev K. Xia, Jun Tao, Tiger H. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Several methods are available for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Core decompression with implantation is a widely-used treatment. However, no single implant is recognized as the most effective way to prevent disease progression. Silk has high strength and resiliency. This study explored the possibility of a strong and resilient silk protein biomaterial as a new alternative implant. METHODS: We investigated the biomechanical properties of the silk protein material by regular compression, torsion, and three-point bending tests. We established three-dimensional finite element models of different degrees of femoral head osteonecrosis following simple core decompression, fibula implantation, porous tantalum rod implantation, and silk protein rod implantation. Finally, we compared the differences in displacement and surface stress under load at the femoral head weight-bearing areas between these models. RESULTS: The elastic modulus and shear modulus of the silk protein material was 0.49GPa and 0.66GPa, respectively. Three-dimensional finite element analyses demonstrated less displacement and surface stress at the femoral head weight-bearing areas following silk protein rod implantation compared to simple core decompression (p < 0.05), regardless of the extent of osteonecrosis. No differences were noted in the surface deformation or surface stress of the femoral head weight-bearing areas following silk protein rod, fibula or tantalum rod implantation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with simple core decompression, silk protein rod implantation demonstrated less displacement and surface stress at the femoral head weight-bearing area, but more than fibula or tantalum rod implantation. Similar effects on the surface stress of the femoral head between the silk rod, fibula and tantalum rod implantations, combined with additional modifiable properties support the use of silk protein as a suitable biomaterial in osteonecrosis surgery. BioMed Central 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6858686/ /pubmed/31730452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2914-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Liangta Chen, Feiyan Wang, Siqun Wei, Yibing Huang, Gangyong Chen, Jie Shi, Jingsheng Naidu, Rajeev K. Xia, Jun Tao, Tiger H. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
title | Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
title_full | Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
title_fullStr | Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
title_full_unstemmed | Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
title_short | Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
title_sort | three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2914-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangliangta threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT chenfeiyan threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT wangsiqun threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT weiyibing threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT huanggangyong threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT chenjie threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT shijingsheng threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT naidurajeevk threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT xiajun threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead AT taotigerh threedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofsilkproteinrodimplantationaftercoredecompressionforosteonecrosisofthefemoralhead |