Cargando…
Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma
BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as the primary curative treatment for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the radiation-related complications and relatively high medical costs remain a consequential bu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0415-3 |
_version_ | 1783471016269316096 |
---|---|
author | Liu, You-Ping Lv, Xing Zou, Xiong Hua, Yi-Jun You, Rui Yang, Qi Xia, Le Guo, Shao-Yan Hu, Wen Zhang, Meng-Xia Chen, Si-Yuan Lin, Mei Xie, Yu-Long Liu, Li-Zhi Sun, Rui Huang, Pei-Yu Fan, Wei Guo, Xiang Hong, Ming-Huang Chen, Ming-Yuan |
author_facet | Liu, You-Ping Lv, Xing Zou, Xiong Hua, Yi-Jun You, Rui Yang, Qi Xia, Le Guo, Shao-Yan Hu, Wen Zhang, Meng-Xia Chen, Si-Yuan Lin, Mei Xie, Yu-Long Liu, Li-Zhi Sun, Rui Huang, Pei-Yu Fan, Wei Guo, Xiang Hong, Ming-Huang Chen, Ming-Yuan |
author_sort | Liu, You-Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as the primary curative treatment for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the radiation-related complications and relatively high medical costs remain a consequential burden for the patients. Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) was successfully applied in recurrent NPC with radiation free and relatively low medical costs. In this study, we examined whether ENPG could be an effective treatment for localized stage I NPC. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed localized stage I NPC patients voluntarily received ENPG alone from June 2007 to September 2017 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Simultaneously, the data of 329 stage I NPC patients treated with IMRT were collected and used as a reference cohort. The survival outcomes, quality of life (QOL), and medical costs between two groups were compared. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 59.0 months (95% CI 53.4–64.6), no death, locoregional recurrence, or distant metastasis was observed in the 10 patients treated with ENPG. The 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, regional relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival among the ENPG-treated patients was similar to that among the IMRT-treated patients (100% vs. 99.1%, 100% vs. 97.7%, 100% vs. 99.0%, 100% vs. 97.4%, respectively, P > 0.05). In addition, compared with IMRT, ENPG was associated with decreased total medical costs ($ 4090.42 ± 1502.65 vs. $ 12620.88 ± 4242.65, P < 0.001) and improved QOL scores including dry mouth (3.3 ± 10.5 vs. 34.4 ± 25.8, P < 0.001) and sticky saliva (3.3 ± 10.5 vs. 32.6 ± 23.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ENPG alone was associated with promising long-term survival outcomes, low medical costs, and satisfactory QOL and might therefore be an alternative strategy for treating newly diagnosed localized stage I NPC patients who refused radiotherapy. However, the application of ENPG should be prudent, and prospective clinical trials were needed to further verify the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68587342019-11-29 Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma Liu, You-Ping Lv, Xing Zou, Xiong Hua, Yi-Jun You, Rui Yang, Qi Xia, Le Guo, Shao-Yan Hu, Wen Zhang, Meng-Xia Chen, Si-Yuan Lin, Mei Xie, Yu-Long Liu, Li-Zhi Sun, Rui Huang, Pei-Yu Fan, Wei Guo, Xiang Hong, Ming-Huang Chen, Ming-Yuan Cancer Commun (Lond) Original Article BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as the primary curative treatment for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the radiation-related complications and relatively high medical costs remain a consequential burden for the patients. Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) was successfully applied in recurrent NPC with radiation free and relatively low medical costs. In this study, we examined whether ENPG could be an effective treatment for localized stage I NPC. METHODS: Ten newly diagnosed localized stage I NPC patients voluntarily received ENPG alone from June 2007 to September 2017 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Simultaneously, the data of 329 stage I NPC patients treated with IMRT were collected and used as a reference cohort. The survival outcomes, quality of life (QOL), and medical costs between two groups were compared. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 59.0 months (95% CI 53.4–64.6), no death, locoregional recurrence, or distant metastasis was observed in the 10 patients treated with ENPG. The 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, regional relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival among the ENPG-treated patients was similar to that among the IMRT-treated patients (100% vs. 99.1%, 100% vs. 97.7%, 100% vs. 99.0%, 100% vs. 97.4%, respectively, P > 0.05). In addition, compared with IMRT, ENPG was associated with decreased total medical costs ($ 4090.42 ± 1502.65 vs. $ 12620.88 ± 4242.65, P < 0.001) and improved QOL scores including dry mouth (3.3 ± 10.5 vs. 34.4 ± 25.8, P < 0.001) and sticky saliva (3.3 ± 10.5 vs. 32.6 ± 23.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ENPG alone was associated with promising long-term survival outcomes, low medical costs, and satisfactory QOL and might therefore be an alternative strategy for treating newly diagnosed localized stage I NPC patients who refused radiotherapy. However, the application of ENPG should be prudent, and prospective clinical trials were needed to further verify the results. BioMed Central 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6858734/ /pubmed/31730020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0415-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Liu, You-Ping Lv, Xing Zou, Xiong Hua, Yi-Jun You, Rui Yang, Qi Xia, Le Guo, Shao-Yan Hu, Wen Zhang, Meng-Xia Chen, Si-Yuan Lin, Mei Xie, Yu-Long Liu, Li-Zhi Sun, Rui Huang, Pei-Yu Fan, Wei Guo, Xiang Hong, Ming-Huang Chen, Ming-Yuan Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title | Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_full | Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_short | Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_sort | minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage i nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31730020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0415-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyouping minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT lvxing minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT zouxiong minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT huayijun minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT yourui minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT yangqi minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT xiale minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT guoshaoyan minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT huwen minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT zhangmengxia minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT chensiyuan minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT linmei minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT xieyulong minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT liulizhi minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT sunrui minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT huangpeiyu minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT fanwei minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT guoxiang minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT hongminghuang minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma AT chenmingyuan minimallyinvasivesurgeryalonecomparedwithintensitymodulatedradiotherapyforprimarystageinasopharyngealcarcinoma |