Cargando…
Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a simple and effective solution in prevention of Multi Drug Resistant Organisms. Hand Hygiene campaigns have mostly taken the form of a generalised hospital approach with visual reminders and rewards for improvement in compliance. We describe a hand hygiene programme that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0641-0 |
_version_ | 1783471024915873792 |
---|---|
author | Pada, Surinder M. S. Kaur Chee, Poh Ling Rathenam, Sarathemani Ng, Kim Sim Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Poh, Lishi Tambyah, Paul Anatharajah |
author_facet | Pada, Surinder M. S. Kaur Chee, Poh Ling Rathenam, Sarathemani Ng, Kim Sim Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Poh, Lishi Tambyah, Paul Anatharajah |
author_sort | Pada, Surinder M. S. Kaur |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a simple and effective solution in prevention of Multi Drug Resistant Organisms. Hand Hygiene campaigns have mostly taken the form of a generalised hospital approach with visual reminders and rewards for improvement in compliance. We describe a hand hygiene programme that sets an individualised ward target to increase accountability and drive improvement. METHODS: We undertook to develop a “Hand Hygiene Accountability” model, where the mean compliance rate, using the WHO hand hygiene assessment tool, for each ward over the past 6 months plus 10% was used as a target for that particular ward. Rewards were given to wards with the most percentage improvement over the year. A graded escalation was used for wards that did not meet targets based on 1,2 or 3 months of non-compliance. The most extreme action, setting up a task force directed by the Chairman of our Medical Board, would be required if 3 continuous months of non-compliance was observed. Hand Hygiene audits were performed by staff trained using the WHO audit tools. The same strategy was repeated at our community hospital. Active surveillance testing for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using nasal, groin and axilla swabs established before the project continued to be in operation, as did surveillance for hospital acquired MRSA bacteraemia (using NHSN criteria), hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile (HO-CD), and multi-resistant gram-negative bacilli. RESULTS: Data from July 2015 to December 2017 was analysed. In the acute and community hospitals, 21,582 and 5770 hand hygiene (HH) observations were undertaken respectively. In the acute care hospital, HH compliance rates went from 65 to 78% (p-value < 0.00001). There was a reduction in MRSA bacteraemia from 5 episodes at the start of the study to 0 in 2017. In the community hospital, HH compliance improved from a mean of 64 to 75% (p-value 0.00005). MRSA transmission rate decreased from 5.72 per 1000 patient days, to 2.79 per 1000 patient days (p-value 0.00035) with an admission prevalence of 13.1% for 2016 and 20.6% in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Using a ward level accountability for hand hygiene is possible and can be successful in improving hand hygiene rates, possibly reducing transmission of MDROs. Realistic targets need to be set and adequate rewards and incentives provided to ensure continuous improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68587692019-11-29 Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene Pada, Surinder M. S. Kaur Chee, Poh Ling Rathenam, Sarathemani Ng, Kim Sim Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Poh, Lishi Tambyah, Paul Anatharajah Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a simple and effective solution in prevention of Multi Drug Resistant Organisms. Hand Hygiene campaigns have mostly taken the form of a generalised hospital approach with visual reminders and rewards for improvement in compliance. We describe a hand hygiene programme that sets an individualised ward target to increase accountability and drive improvement. METHODS: We undertook to develop a “Hand Hygiene Accountability” model, where the mean compliance rate, using the WHO hand hygiene assessment tool, for each ward over the past 6 months plus 10% was used as a target for that particular ward. Rewards were given to wards with the most percentage improvement over the year. A graded escalation was used for wards that did not meet targets based on 1,2 or 3 months of non-compliance. The most extreme action, setting up a task force directed by the Chairman of our Medical Board, would be required if 3 continuous months of non-compliance was observed. Hand Hygiene audits were performed by staff trained using the WHO audit tools. The same strategy was repeated at our community hospital. Active surveillance testing for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using nasal, groin and axilla swabs established before the project continued to be in operation, as did surveillance for hospital acquired MRSA bacteraemia (using NHSN criteria), hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile (HO-CD), and multi-resistant gram-negative bacilli. RESULTS: Data from July 2015 to December 2017 was analysed. In the acute and community hospitals, 21,582 and 5770 hand hygiene (HH) observations were undertaken respectively. In the acute care hospital, HH compliance rates went from 65 to 78% (p-value < 0.00001). There was a reduction in MRSA bacteraemia from 5 episodes at the start of the study to 0 in 2017. In the community hospital, HH compliance improved from a mean of 64 to 75% (p-value 0.00005). MRSA transmission rate decreased from 5.72 per 1000 patient days, to 2.79 per 1000 patient days (p-value 0.00035) with an admission prevalence of 13.1% for 2016 and 20.6% in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Using a ward level accountability for hand hygiene is possible and can be successful in improving hand hygiene rates, possibly reducing transmission of MDROs. Realistic targets need to be set and adequate rewards and incentives provided to ensure continuous improvement. BioMed Central 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6858769/ /pubmed/31788234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0641-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Pada, Surinder M. S. Kaur Chee, Poh Ling Rathenam, Sarathemani Ng, Kim Sim Alenton, Lilibeth Silagan Poh, Lishi Tambyah, Paul Anatharajah Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
title | Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
title_full | Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
title_short | Effectiveness of a Ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
title_sort | effectiveness of a ward level target accountability strategy for hand hygiene |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31788234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0641-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT padasurindermskaur effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene AT cheepohling effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene AT rathenamsarathemani effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene AT ngkimsim effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene AT alentonlilibethsilagan effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene AT pohlishi effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene AT tambyahpaulanatharajah effectivenessofawardleveltargetaccountabilitystrategyforhandhygiene |