Cargando…

Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has resulted in treatment using bacteriophage. This study aimed to identify Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci and antibiotic resistance in patients with BSI in a burn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zichen, Shi, Yunlong, Zhang, Cheng, Luo, Xiaoqiang, Chen, Yu, Peng, Yizhi, Gong, Yali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31693655
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917706
_version_ 1783471029117517824
author Yang, Zichen
Shi, Yunlong
Zhang, Cheng
Luo, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Yu
Peng, Yizhi
Gong, Yali
author_facet Yang, Zichen
Shi, Yunlong
Zhang, Cheng
Luo, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Yu
Peng, Yizhi
Gong, Yali
author_sort Yang, Zichen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has resulted in treatment using bacteriophage. This study aimed to identify Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci and antibiotic resistance in patients with BSI in a burn intensive care unit (BICU). The environment, including sewage systems, were investigated for the presence of lytic bacteriophage. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 2011 to December 2017, 486 patients with BSI were admitted to the BICU. Blood culture identified the main infectious organisms. Bacterial screening tests for antibiotic resistance included the D test and the modified Hodge test (MHT). Lytic bacteriophage was isolated from the environment. RESULTS: In 486 patients with BSI, the main causative organisms were Gram-negative bacilli (64.6%), Gram-positive cocci (27.7%), and fungi (7.7%). The main pathogenic organisms that showed multidrug resistance (MDR) were Acinetobacter baumannii (26.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.8%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.2%). Bacteriophage was mainly isolated from Gram-negative bacilli. Screening of hospital and residential sewage systems identified increased levels of bacteriophage in hospital sewage. CONCLUSIONS: The causative organisms of BSI and the presence of MDR in a hospital BICU were not typical, which supports the need for routine bacterial monitoring. Hospital sewage provides a potential source of bacteriophage for the treatment of MDR pathogenic bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68587842019-11-19 Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit Yang, Zichen Shi, Yunlong Zhang, Cheng Luo, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yu Peng, Yizhi Gong, Yali Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has resulted in treatment using bacteriophage. This study aimed to identify Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci and antibiotic resistance in patients with BSI in a burn intensive care unit (BICU). The environment, including sewage systems, were investigated for the presence of lytic bacteriophage. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 2011 to December 2017, 486 patients with BSI were admitted to the BICU. Blood culture identified the main infectious organisms. Bacterial screening tests for antibiotic resistance included the D test and the modified Hodge test (MHT). Lytic bacteriophage was isolated from the environment. RESULTS: In 486 patients with BSI, the main causative organisms were Gram-negative bacilli (64.6%), Gram-positive cocci (27.7%), and fungi (7.7%). The main pathogenic organisms that showed multidrug resistance (MDR) were Acinetobacter baumannii (26.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.8%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.2%). Bacteriophage was mainly isolated from Gram-negative bacilli. Screening of hospital and residential sewage systems identified increased levels of bacteriophage in hospital sewage. CONCLUSIONS: The causative organisms of BSI and the presence of MDR in a hospital BICU were not typical, which supports the need for routine bacterial monitoring. Hospital sewage provides a potential source of bacteriophage for the treatment of MDR pathogenic bacteria. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6858784/ /pubmed/31693655 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917706 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Yang, Zichen
Shi, Yunlong
Zhang, Cheng
Luo, Xiaoqiang
Chen, Yu
Peng, Yizhi
Gong, Yali
Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_full Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_short Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_sort lytic bacteriophage screening strategies for multidrug-resistant bloodstream infections in a burn intensive care unit
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31693655
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917706
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzichen lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT shiyunlong lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT zhangcheng lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT luoxiaoqiang lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT chenyu lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT pengyizhi lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT gongyali lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit