Cargando…
Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has resulted in treatment using bacteriophage. This study aimed to identify Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci and antibiotic resistance in patients with BSI in a burn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31693655 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917706 |
_version_ | 1783471029117517824 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Zichen Shi, Yunlong Zhang, Cheng Luo, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yu Peng, Yizhi Gong, Yali |
author_facet | Yang, Zichen Shi, Yunlong Zhang, Cheng Luo, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yu Peng, Yizhi Gong, Yali |
author_sort | Yang, Zichen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has resulted in treatment using bacteriophage. This study aimed to identify Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci and antibiotic resistance in patients with BSI in a burn intensive care unit (BICU). The environment, including sewage systems, were investigated for the presence of lytic bacteriophage. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 2011 to December 2017, 486 patients with BSI were admitted to the BICU. Blood culture identified the main infectious organisms. Bacterial screening tests for antibiotic resistance included the D test and the modified Hodge test (MHT). Lytic bacteriophage was isolated from the environment. RESULTS: In 486 patients with BSI, the main causative organisms were Gram-negative bacilli (64.6%), Gram-positive cocci (27.7%), and fungi (7.7%). The main pathogenic organisms that showed multidrug resistance (MDR) were Acinetobacter baumannii (26.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.8%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.2%). Bacteriophage was mainly isolated from Gram-negative bacilli. Screening of hospital and residential sewage systems identified increased levels of bacteriophage in hospital sewage. CONCLUSIONS: The causative organisms of BSI and the presence of MDR in a hospital BICU were not typical, which supports the need for routine bacterial monitoring. Hospital sewage provides a potential source of bacteriophage for the treatment of MDR pathogenic bacteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68587842019-11-19 Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit Yang, Zichen Shi, Yunlong Zhang, Cheng Luo, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yu Peng, Yizhi Gong, Yali Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance and multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has resulted in treatment using bacteriophage. This study aimed to identify Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci and antibiotic resistance in patients with BSI in a burn intensive care unit (BICU). The environment, including sewage systems, were investigated for the presence of lytic bacteriophage. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between January 2011 to December 2017, 486 patients with BSI were admitted to the BICU. Blood culture identified the main infectious organisms. Bacterial screening tests for antibiotic resistance included the D test and the modified Hodge test (MHT). Lytic bacteriophage was isolated from the environment. RESULTS: In 486 patients with BSI, the main causative organisms were Gram-negative bacilli (64.6%), Gram-positive cocci (27.7%), and fungi (7.7%). The main pathogenic organisms that showed multidrug resistance (MDR) were Acinetobacter baumannii (26.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (16.8%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.2%). Bacteriophage was mainly isolated from Gram-negative bacilli. Screening of hospital and residential sewage systems identified increased levels of bacteriophage in hospital sewage. CONCLUSIONS: The causative organisms of BSI and the presence of MDR in a hospital BICU were not typical, which supports the need for routine bacterial monitoring. Hospital sewage provides a potential source of bacteriophage for the treatment of MDR pathogenic bacteria. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6858784/ /pubmed/31693655 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917706 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Yang, Zichen Shi, Yunlong Zhang, Cheng Luo, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yu Peng, Yizhi Gong, Yali Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit |
title | Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit |
title_full | Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit |
title_fullStr | Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit |
title_short | Lytic Bacteriophage Screening Strategies for Multidrug-Resistant Bloodstream Infections in a Burn Intensive Care Unit |
title_sort | lytic bacteriophage screening strategies for multidrug-resistant bloodstream infections in a burn intensive care unit |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31693655 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.917706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangzichen lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit AT shiyunlong lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit AT zhangcheng lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit AT luoxiaoqiang lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit AT chenyu lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit AT pengyizhi lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit AT gongyali lyticbacteriophagescreeningstrategiesformultidrugresistantbloodstreaminfectionsinaburnintensivecareunit |