Cargando…

Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongjirattikarn, Rachot, Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak, Pranboon, Sineenard, Tiamkao, Siriporn, Tiamkao, Somsak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x
_version_ 1783471050722377728
author Wongjirattikarn, Rachot
Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak
Pranboon, Sineenard
Tiamkao, Siriporn
Tiamkao, Somsak
author_facet Wongjirattikarn, Rachot
Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak
Pranboon, Sineenard
Tiamkao, Siriporn
Tiamkao, Somsak
author_sort Wongjirattikarn, Rachot
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizure (ARCS) or SE. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with SE or ARCS were included in this double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio (via computer-generated code) to receive either brand-name or generic IV LEV. The primary outcomes were seizure control and the number of seizure exacerbations during the 24 h after drug administration, while the secondary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, serious adverse events, and clinical outcome at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomly assigned administration with either brand-name IV LEV (10 SE and 10 ARCS patients) or generic IV LEV; 7 SE and 13 ARCS patients). There was no significant difference in patients’ baseline characteristics. The seizure control rate was 75% in the brand-name IV LEV group and 65% in the generic IV LEV group (p value: 0.490). Five (25%) patients in the brand-name IV LEV group, and six (30%) patients in the generic IV LEV group developed seizure exacerbations within 24 h after drug administration (p value 0.723). There were no reports of drug-related adverse events. Two of the patients taking brand-name IV LEV and one taking the generic IV LEV died (p value > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the generic IV LEV had comparable outcomes with brand-name IV LEV. The generic IV LEV may be an alternative medication for the treatment of SE and ARCS to reduce treatment costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20190513001. FUNDING: Great Eastern Drug Company.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6858918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68589182019-12-16 Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial Wongjirattikarn, Rachot Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak Pranboon, Sineenard Tiamkao, Siriporn Tiamkao, Somsak Neurol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizure (ARCS) or SE. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with SE or ARCS were included in this double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio (via computer-generated code) to receive either brand-name or generic IV LEV. The primary outcomes were seizure control and the number of seizure exacerbations during the 24 h after drug administration, while the secondary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, serious adverse events, and clinical outcome at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomly assigned administration with either brand-name IV LEV (10 SE and 10 ARCS patients) or generic IV LEV; 7 SE and 13 ARCS patients). There was no significant difference in patients’ baseline characteristics. The seizure control rate was 75% in the brand-name IV LEV group and 65% in the generic IV LEV group (p value: 0.490). Five (25%) patients in the brand-name IV LEV group, and six (30%) patients in the generic IV LEV group developed seizure exacerbations within 24 h after drug administration (p value 0.723). There were no reports of drug-related adverse events. Two of the patients taking brand-name IV LEV and one taking the generic IV LEV died (p value > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the generic IV LEV had comparable outcomes with brand-name IV LEV. The generic IV LEV may be an alternative medication for the treatment of SE and ARCS to reduce treatment costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20190513001. FUNDING: Great Eastern Drug Company. Springer Healthcare 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6858918/ /pubmed/31407191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wongjirattikarn, Rachot
Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak
Pranboon, Sineenard
Tiamkao, Siriporn
Tiamkao, Somsak
Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort can generic intravenous levetiracetam be used for acute repetitive convulsive seizure or status epilepticus? a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wongjirattikarnrachot cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sawanyawisuthkittisak cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pranboonsineenard cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tiamkaosiriporn cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tiamkaosomsak cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial