Cargando…
Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x |
_version_ | 1783471050722377728 |
---|---|
author | Wongjirattikarn, Rachot Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak Pranboon, Sineenard Tiamkao, Siriporn Tiamkao, Somsak |
author_facet | Wongjirattikarn, Rachot Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak Pranboon, Sineenard Tiamkao, Siriporn Tiamkao, Somsak |
author_sort | Wongjirattikarn, Rachot |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizure (ARCS) or SE. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with SE or ARCS were included in this double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio (via computer-generated code) to receive either brand-name or generic IV LEV. The primary outcomes were seizure control and the number of seizure exacerbations during the 24 h after drug administration, while the secondary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, serious adverse events, and clinical outcome at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomly assigned administration with either brand-name IV LEV (10 SE and 10 ARCS patients) or generic IV LEV; 7 SE and 13 ARCS patients). There was no significant difference in patients’ baseline characteristics. The seizure control rate was 75% in the brand-name IV LEV group and 65% in the generic IV LEV group (p value: 0.490). Five (25%) patients in the brand-name IV LEV group, and six (30%) patients in the generic IV LEV group developed seizure exacerbations within 24 h after drug administration (p value 0.723). There were no reports of drug-related adverse events. Two of the patients taking brand-name IV LEV and one taking the generic IV LEV died (p value > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the generic IV LEV had comparable outcomes with brand-name IV LEV. The generic IV LEV may be an alternative medication for the treatment of SE and ARCS to reduce treatment costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20190513001. FUNDING: Great Eastern Drug Company. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68589182019-12-16 Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial Wongjirattikarn, Rachot Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak Pranboon, Sineenard Tiamkao, Siriporn Tiamkao, Somsak Neurol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) is approved for treatment status epilepticus (SE). However, the drug’s high cost must be considered when deciding on a treatment strategy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of brand-name and generic IV LEV for acute repetitive convulsive seizure (ARCS) or SE. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with SE or ARCS were included in this double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio (via computer-generated code) to receive either brand-name or generic IV LEV. The primary outcomes were seizure control and the number of seizure exacerbations during the 24 h after drug administration, while the secondary outcomes were electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, serious adverse events, and clinical outcome at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomly assigned administration with either brand-name IV LEV (10 SE and 10 ARCS patients) or generic IV LEV; 7 SE and 13 ARCS patients). There was no significant difference in patients’ baseline characteristics. The seizure control rate was 75% in the brand-name IV LEV group and 65% in the generic IV LEV group (p value: 0.490). Five (25%) patients in the brand-name IV LEV group, and six (30%) patients in the generic IV LEV group developed seizure exacerbations within 24 h after drug administration (p value 0.723). There were no reports of drug-related adverse events. Two of the patients taking brand-name IV LEV and one taking the generic IV LEV died (p value > 0.999). CONCLUSION: Treatment with the generic IV LEV had comparable outcomes with brand-name IV LEV. The generic IV LEV may be an alternative medication for the treatment of SE and ARCS to reduce treatment costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20190513001. FUNDING: Great Eastern Drug Company. Springer Healthcare 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6858918/ /pubmed/31407191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wongjirattikarn, Rachot Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak Pranboon, Sineenard Tiamkao, Siriporn Tiamkao, Somsak Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Can Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam Be Used for Acute Repetitive Convulsive Seizure or Status Epilepticus? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | can generic intravenous levetiracetam be used for acute repetitive convulsive seizure or status epilepticus? a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-019-00150-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongjirattikarnrachot cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sawanyawisuthkittisak cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pranboonsineenard cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tiamkaosiriporn cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tiamkaosomsak cangenericintravenouslevetiracetambeusedforacuterepetitiveconvulsiveseizureorstatusepilepticusarandomizedcontrolledtrial |