Cargando…
The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study
BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is a complex disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of bladder cancer before radical cystectomy continues to be controversial. We compared the long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) versus no IAC (NIAC) before...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0552-7 |
_version_ | 1783471052197724160 |
---|---|
author | Wahafu, Wasilijiang Liu, Sai Xu, Wenbin Wang, Mengtong He, Qingbao Song, Liming Wang, Mingshuai Yang, Feiya Hua, Lin Niu, Yinong Xing, Nianzeng |
author_facet | Wahafu, Wasilijiang Liu, Sai Xu, Wenbin Wang, Mengtong He, Qingbao Song, Liming Wang, Mingshuai Yang, Feiya Hua, Lin Niu, Yinong Xing, Nianzeng |
author_sort | Wahafu, Wasilijiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is a complex disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of bladder cancer before radical cystectomy continues to be controversial. We compared the long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) versus no IAC (NIAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent either one-shot IAC or NIAC before RC between October 2006 and November 2015. A propensity-score matching (1:3) was performed based on key characters. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to estimate survival probabilities, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes between different groups. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated using IAC before RC, and 123 NIAC patients also underwent RC. After matching, there was no significant difference between groups in baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, complication outcomes or tumor characteristics. Compared with clinical tumor stages, pathological tumor stages demonstrated a significant decrease (P = 0.002) in the IAC group. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS, p = 0.354) or cancer-specific survival (CSS, p = 0.439) between the groups. Among all patients, BMI significantly affected OS (p = 0.004), and positive lymph nodes (PLN) significantly affected both OS (p<0.001) and CSS (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: One-shot neoadjuvant IAC before RC shows safety and tolerability and provides a significant advantage in pathological downstaging but not in OS or CSS. Further study of neoadjuvant combination therapeutic strategies with RC is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6858971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68589712019-11-22 The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study Wahafu, Wasilijiang Liu, Sai Xu, Wenbin Wang, Mengtong He, Qingbao Song, Liming Wang, Mingshuai Yang, Feiya Hua, Lin Niu, Yinong Xing, Nianzeng BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is a complex disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of bladder cancer before radical cystectomy continues to be controversial. We compared the long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) versus no IAC (NIAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent either one-shot IAC or NIAC before RC between October 2006 and November 2015. A propensity-score matching (1:3) was performed based on key characters. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to estimate survival probabilities, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes between different groups. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated using IAC before RC, and 123 NIAC patients also underwent RC. After matching, there was no significant difference between groups in baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, complication outcomes or tumor characteristics. Compared with clinical tumor stages, pathological tumor stages demonstrated a significant decrease (P = 0.002) in the IAC group. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS, p = 0.354) or cancer-specific survival (CSS, p = 0.439) between the groups. Among all patients, BMI significantly affected OS (p = 0.004), and positive lymph nodes (PLN) significantly affected both OS (p<0.001) and CSS (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: One-shot neoadjuvant IAC before RC shows safety and tolerability and provides a significant advantage in pathological downstaging but not in OS or CSS. Further study of neoadjuvant combination therapeutic strategies with RC is needed. BioMed Central 2019-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6858971/ /pubmed/31733646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0552-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wahafu, Wasilijiang Liu, Sai Xu, Wenbin Wang, Mengtong He, Qingbao Song, Liming Wang, Mingshuai Yang, Feiya Hua, Lin Niu, Yinong Xing, Nianzeng The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
title | The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
title_full | The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
title_fullStr | The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
title_full_unstemmed | The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
title_short | The long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
title_sort | long-term efficacy of one-shot neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy alone for bladder cancer: a propensity-score matching study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6858971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31733646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0552-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wahafuwasilijiang thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT liusai thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT xuwenbin thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangmengtong thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT heqingbao thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT songliming thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangmingshuai thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT yangfeiya thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT hualin thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT niuyinong thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT xingnianzeng thelongtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wahafuwasilijiang longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT liusai longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT xuwenbin longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangmengtong longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT heqingbao longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT songliming longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangmingshuai longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT yangfeiya longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT hualin longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT niuyinong longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy AT xingnianzeng longtermefficacyofoneshotneoadjuvantintraarterialchemotherapycombinedwithradicalcystectomyversusradicalcystectomyaloneforbladdercancerapropensityscorematchingstudy |