Genetic and phylogenetic analysis of Chinese sacbrood virus isolates from Apis mellifera

BACKGROUND: Sacbrood virus (SBV) is one of the most pathogenic honeybee viruses that exhibits host specificity and regional variations. The SBV strains that infect the Chinese honeybee Apis cerana are called Chinese SBVs (CSBVs). METHODS: In this study, a CSBV strain named AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 (GenBank accession No. MG733283) infecting A. mellifera was identified by electron microscopy, its protein composition was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and agar gel immunodiffusion assay, and its nucleotide sequence was identified using a series of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction fragments of AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 generated using SBV/CSBV-specific primers. To investigate phylogenetic relationships of the CSBV isolates, a phylogenetic tree of the complete open reading frames (ORF) of the CSBV sequences was constructed using MEGA 6.0; then, the similarity and recombination events among the isolated CSBV strains were analyzed using SimPlot and RDP4 software, respectively. RESULTS: Sequencing results revealed the complete 8,794-nucleotide long complete genomic RNA of the strain, with a single large ORF (189–8,717) encoding 2,843 amino acids. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence with the SBV/CSBV reference sequences deposited in the GenBank database identified helicase, protease, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase domains; the structural genes were located at the 5′ end, whereas the non-structural genes were found at the 3′ end. Multiple sequence alignment showed that AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 had a 17-amino acid (aa) and a single aa deletion at positions 711–729 and 2,128, respectively, as compared with CSBV-GD-2002, and a 16-aa deletion (positions 711–713 and 715–728) as compared with AmSBV-UK-2000. However, AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 was similar to the CSBV-JLCBS-2014 strain, which infects A. cerana. AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 ORF shared 92.4–97.1% identity with the genomes of other CSBV strains (94.5–97.7% identity for deduced amino acids). AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 was least similar (89.5–90.4% identity) to other SBVs but showed maximum similarity with the previously reported CSBV-FZ-2014 strain. The phylogenetic tree constructed from AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 and 43 previously reported SBV/CSBV sequences indicated that SBV/CSBV strains clustered according to the host species and country of origin; AmCSBV-SDLY-2016 clustered with other previously reported Chinese and Asian strains (AC genotype SBV, as these strains originated from A. cerana) but was separate from the SBV genomes originating from Europe (AM genotype SBV, originating from A. mellifera). A SimPlot graph of SBV genomes confirmed the high variability, especially between the AC genotype SBV and AM genotype SBV. This genomic diversity may reflect the adaptation of SBV to specific hosts, ability of CSBV to cross the species barrier, and the spatial distances that separate CSBVs from other SBVs.