Cargando…

A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research

Data acquisition in (pre)clinical studies is often based on a hypothesis. Numerical algorithms, however, may help to find biomarkers from existing data without formulating any hypothesis. By simply assessing whether a statistical relationship exists between two parameters from a (unlimited) database...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neidnicht, Martin, Mittermüller, Daniela, Effenberger-Neidnicht, Katharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz107
_version_ 1783471090684657664
author Neidnicht, Martin
Mittermüller, Daniela
Effenberger-Neidnicht, Katharina
author_facet Neidnicht, Martin
Mittermüller, Daniela
Effenberger-Neidnicht, Katharina
author_sort Neidnicht, Martin
collection PubMed
description Data acquisition in (pre)clinical studies is often based on a hypothesis. Numerical algorithms, however, may help to find biomarkers from existing data without formulating any hypothesis. By simply assessing whether a statistical relationship exists between two parameters from a (unlimited) database, every (in)conceivable combination of data becomes a hypothesis. The aim was to create an unbiased and highly automated approach for secondary analysis of (pre)clinical research, including the possibility of a non-linear functional relationship. In our example, an almost homogeneous database was formed by overall 45 parameters (vital, blood and plasma parameters) measured in 11 individual experimental studies at 6 different time points using 57 rats without and 63 rats with systemic inflammation following lipopolysaccharide infusion. For each rat, four group classifiers (treatment, survival, study, ID) were used to get valid samples by a later filtering of the statistical base. Any information about the hypothesis leading to the respective studies was suppressed. In order to assess whether a statistical relationship exists, a total of six different functional prototypes (linear and non-linear) were postulated and examined for their regression. Regression quality, correlation and significance were obtained in form of matrices. In our example, ultimately 510 300 regressions were optimized, automatically evaluated and filtered. The developed algorithm is able to reveal statistical relationships from a nearly crude database with low effort by systematic and unbiased analysis. The finding of well-known correlations proves its reliability, whose validity could be increased by clean aggregation of different studies. In addition, new interesting hints for future research could be gained. Thus, unknown markers can be found which are associated with an increased risk of death during systemic inflammation and sepsis. A further development of the program is planned including multiple regressions (more than two parameters could be related to each other) or cluster analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6859257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68592572019-11-21 A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research Neidnicht, Martin Mittermüller, Daniela Effenberger-Neidnicht, Katharina Database (Oxford) Perspective/Opinion Data acquisition in (pre)clinical studies is often based on a hypothesis. Numerical algorithms, however, may help to find biomarkers from existing data without formulating any hypothesis. By simply assessing whether a statistical relationship exists between two parameters from a (unlimited) database, every (in)conceivable combination of data becomes a hypothesis. The aim was to create an unbiased and highly automated approach for secondary analysis of (pre)clinical research, including the possibility of a non-linear functional relationship. In our example, an almost homogeneous database was formed by overall 45 parameters (vital, blood and plasma parameters) measured in 11 individual experimental studies at 6 different time points using 57 rats without and 63 rats with systemic inflammation following lipopolysaccharide infusion. For each rat, four group classifiers (treatment, survival, study, ID) were used to get valid samples by a later filtering of the statistical base. Any information about the hypothesis leading to the respective studies was suppressed. In order to assess whether a statistical relationship exists, a total of six different functional prototypes (linear and non-linear) were postulated and examined for their regression. Regression quality, correlation and significance were obtained in form of matrices. In our example, ultimately 510 300 regressions were optimized, automatically evaluated and filtered. The developed algorithm is able to reveal statistical relationships from a nearly crude database with low effort by systematic and unbiased analysis. The finding of well-known correlations proves its reliability, whose validity could be increased by clean aggregation of different studies. In addition, new interesting hints for future research could be gained. Thus, unknown markers can be found which are associated with an increased risk of death during systemic inflammation and sepsis. A further development of the program is planned including multiple regressions (more than two parameters could be related to each other) or cluster analysis. Oxford University Press 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6859257/ /pubmed/31735952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz107 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspective/Opinion
Neidnicht, Martin
Mittermüller, Daniela
Effenberger-Neidnicht, Katharina
A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
title A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
title_full A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
title_fullStr A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
title_full_unstemmed A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
title_short A new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
title_sort new unbiased and highly automated approach to find new prognostic markers in preclinical research
topic Perspective/Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31735952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz107
work_keys_str_mv AT neidnichtmartin anewunbiasedandhighlyautomatedapproachtofindnewprognosticmarkersinpreclinicalresearch
AT mittermullerdaniela anewunbiasedandhighlyautomatedapproachtofindnewprognosticmarkersinpreclinicalresearch
AT effenbergerneidnichtkatharina anewunbiasedandhighlyautomatedapproachtofindnewprognosticmarkersinpreclinicalresearch
AT neidnichtmartin newunbiasedandhighlyautomatedapproachtofindnewprognosticmarkersinpreclinicalresearch
AT mittermullerdaniela newunbiasedandhighlyautomatedapproachtofindnewprognosticmarkersinpreclinicalresearch
AT effenbergerneidnichtkatharina newunbiasedandhighlyautomatedapproachtofindnewprognosticmarkersinpreclinicalresearch