Cargando…

SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants

CYP3RNA, a double‐stranded (ds)RNA designed to concomitantly target the two sterol 14α‐demethylase genes FgCYP51A and FgCYP51B and the fungal virulence factor FgCYP51C, inhibits the growth of the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum (Fg) in vitro and in planta. Here we compare two different method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Aline, Höfle, Lisa, Werner, Bernhard Timo, Imani, Jafargholi, Schmidt, Alexandra, Jelonek, Lukas, Kogel, Karl‐Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31603277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12866
_version_ 1783471125195390976
author Koch, Aline
Höfle, Lisa
Werner, Bernhard Timo
Imani, Jafargholi
Schmidt, Alexandra
Jelonek, Lukas
Kogel, Karl‐Heinz
author_facet Koch, Aline
Höfle, Lisa
Werner, Bernhard Timo
Imani, Jafargholi
Schmidt, Alexandra
Jelonek, Lukas
Kogel, Karl‐Heinz
author_sort Koch, Aline
collection PubMed
description CYP3RNA, a double‐stranded (ds)RNA designed to concomitantly target the two sterol 14α‐demethylase genes FgCYP51A and FgCYP51B and the fungal virulence factor FgCYP51C, inhibits the growth of the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum (Fg) in vitro and in planta. Here we compare two different methods (setups) of dsRNA delivery, viz. transgene expression (host‐induced gene silencing, HIGS) and spray application (spray‐induced gene silencing, SIGS), to assess the activity of CYP3RNA and novel dsRNA species designed to target one or two FgCYP51 genes. Using Arabidopsis and barley, we found that dsRNA designed to target two FgCYP51 genes inhibited fungal growth more efficiently than dsRNA targeting a single gene, although both dsRNA species reduced fungal infection. Either dsRNA delivery method reduced fungal growth stronger than anticipated from previous mutational knock‐out (KO) strategies, where single gene KO had no significant effect on fungal viability. Consistent with the strong inhibitory effects of the dsRNAs on fungal development in both setups, we detected to a large extent dsRNA‐mediated co‐silencing of respective non‐target FgCYP51 genes. Together, our data further support the valuation that dsRNA applications have an interesting potential for pesticide target validation and gene function studies, apart from their potential for crop protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6859480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68594802019-12-12 SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants Koch, Aline Höfle, Lisa Werner, Bernhard Timo Imani, Jafargholi Schmidt, Alexandra Jelonek, Lukas Kogel, Karl‐Heinz Mol Plant Pathol Original Articles CYP3RNA, a double‐stranded (ds)RNA designed to concomitantly target the two sterol 14α‐demethylase genes FgCYP51A and FgCYP51B and the fungal virulence factor FgCYP51C, inhibits the growth of the ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum (Fg) in vitro and in planta. Here we compare two different methods (setups) of dsRNA delivery, viz. transgene expression (host‐induced gene silencing, HIGS) and spray application (spray‐induced gene silencing, SIGS), to assess the activity of CYP3RNA and novel dsRNA species designed to target one or two FgCYP51 genes. Using Arabidopsis and barley, we found that dsRNA designed to target two FgCYP51 genes inhibited fungal growth more efficiently than dsRNA targeting a single gene, although both dsRNA species reduced fungal infection. Either dsRNA delivery method reduced fungal growth stronger than anticipated from previous mutational knock‐out (KO) strategies, where single gene KO had no significant effect on fungal viability. Consistent with the strong inhibitory effects of the dsRNAs on fungal development in both setups, we detected to a large extent dsRNA‐mediated co‐silencing of respective non‐target FgCYP51 genes. Together, our data further support the valuation that dsRNA applications have an interesting potential for pesticide target validation and gene function studies, apart from their potential for crop protection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6859480/ /pubmed/31603277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12866 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Plant Pathology published by British Society for Plant Pathology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Koch, Aline
Höfle, Lisa
Werner, Bernhard Timo
Imani, Jafargholi
Schmidt, Alexandra
Jelonek, Lukas
Kogel, Karl‐Heinz
SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
title SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
title_full SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
title_fullStr SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
title_full_unstemmed SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
title_short SIGS vs HIGS: a study on the efficacy of two dsRNA delivery strategies to silence Fusarium FgCYP51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
title_sort sigs vs higs: a study on the efficacy of two dsrna delivery strategies to silence fusarium fgcyp51 genes in infected host and non‐host plants
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31603277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12866
work_keys_str_mv AT kochaline sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants
AT hoflelisa sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants
AT wernerbernhardtimo sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants
AT imanijafargholi sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants
AT schmidtalexandra sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants
AT jeloneklukas sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants
AT kogelkarlheinz sigsvshigsastudyontheefficacyoftwodsrnadeliverystrategiestosilencefusariumfgcyp51genesininfectedhostandnonhostplants