Cargando…

Imaging Artifacts and Segmentation Errors With Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE: To analyze imaging artifacts and segmentation errors with wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) in diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from December 2018 to March 2019. Prolifer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Ying, Zhu, Ying, Wang, Jay C., Lu, Yifan, Zeng, Rebecca, Katz, Raviv, Wu, David M., Vavvas, Demetrios G., Husain, Deeba, Miller, Joan W., Kim, Leo A., Miller, John B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31772829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.6.18
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To analyze imaging artifacts and segmentation errors with wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) in diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from December 2018 to March 2019. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), diabetic patients with no diabetic retinopathy (DR), and healthy control eyes were included. All patients were imaged with a SS-OCTA and the Montage Angio (15 × 9 mm) was used for analysis. Images were independently evaluated by two graders using the motion artifact score (MAS). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 and R software. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six eyes in 98 participants with the montage image were included in the study. Patients with more severe stages of DR had higher MAS by trend test analysis (P < 0.05). The occurrence of segmentation error was 0% in the healthy group, 10.53% in the no DR group, 10.00% in the NPDR group, and 50% in the PDR group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the severity of DR and dry eye were the major factors affecting MAS (P < 0.05). There were some modifiable artifacts that could be corrected to improve image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Wide field SS-OCTA assesses retinal microvascular changes by noninvasive techniques, yet distinguishing real alterations from artifacts is paramount to accurate interpretations. DR severity and dry eye correlated with MAS. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Understanding contributing factors and methods to reduce artifacts is critical to routine use and clinical trial with wide-field SS-OCTA.