Cargando…

A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity

Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nithin, Chandran, Mukherjee, Sunandan, Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.071779.119
_version_ 1783471201832665088
author Nithin, Chandran
Mukherjee, Sunandan
Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad
author_facet Nithin, Chandran
Mukherjee, Sunandan
Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad
author_sort Nithin, Chandran
collection PubMed
description Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinity range of eight orders of magnitude as well as four different structural classes. On average, we find the complexes with single-stranded RNA have the highest affinity, whereas the complexes with the duplex RNA have the lowest. Nevertheless, free energy gain upon binding is the highest for the complexes with ribosomal proteins and the lowest for the complexes with tRNA with an average of −5.7 cal/mol/Å(2) in the entire data set. We train regression models to predict the binding affinity from the structural and physicochemical parameters of protein–RNA interfaces. The best fit model with the lowest maximum error is provided with three interface parameters: relative hydrophobicity, conformational change upon binding and relative hydration pattern. This model has been used for predicting the binding affinity on a test data set, generated using mutated structures of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, for which experimentally determined ΔG values of 40 mutations are available. The predicted ΔG(empirical) values highly correlate with the experimental observations. The data set provided in this study should be useful for further development of the binding affinity prediction methods. Moreover, the model developed in this study enhances our understanding on the structural basis of protein–RNA binding affinity and provides a platform to engineer protein–RNA interfaces with desired affinity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6859855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68598552020-12-01 A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity Nithin, Chandran Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad RNA Article Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinity range of eight orders of magnitude as well as four different structural classes. On average, we find the complexes with single-stranded RNA have the highest affinity, whereas the complexes with the duplex RNA have the lowest. Nevertheless, free energy gain upon binding is the highest for the complexes with ribosomal proteins and the lowest for the complexes with tRNA with an average of −5.7 cal/mol/Å(2) in the entire data set. We train regression models to predict the binding affinity from the structural and physicochemical parameters of protein–RNA interfaces. The best fit model with the lowest maximum error is provided with three interface parameters: relative hydrophobicity, conformational change upon binding and relative hydration pattern. This model has been used for predicting the binding affinity on a test data set, generated using mutated structures of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, for which experimentally determined ΔG values of 40 mutations are available. The predicted ΔG(empirical) values highly correlate with the experimental observations. The data set provided in this study should be useful for further development of the binding affinity prediction methods. Moreover, the model developed in this study enhances our understanding on the structural basis of protein–RNA binding affinity and provides a platform to engineer protein–RNA interfaces with desired affinity. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6859855/ /pubmed/31395671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.071779.119 Text en © 2019 Nithin et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by the RNA Society for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Nithin, Chandran
Mukherjee, Sunandan
Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad
A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
title A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
title_full A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
title_fullStr A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
title_full_unstemmed A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
title_short A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
title_sort structure-based model for the prediction of protein–rna binding affinity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.071779.119
work_keys_str_mv AT nithinchandran astructurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity
AT mukherjeesunandan astructurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity
AT bahadurranjitprasad astructurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity
AT nithinchandran structurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity
AT mukherjeesunandan structurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity
AT bahadurranjitprasad structurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity