Cargando…
A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity
Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinit...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.071779.119 |
_version_ | 1783471201832665088 |
---|---|
author | Nithin, Chandran Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad |
author_facet | Nithin, Chandran Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad |
author_sort | Nithin, Chandran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinity range of eight orders of magnitude as well as four different structural classes. On average, we find the complexes with single-stranded RNA have the highest affinity, whereas the complexes with the duplex RNA have the lowest. Nevertheless, free energy gain upon binding is the highest for the complexes with ribosomal proteins and the lowest for the complexes with tRNA with an average of −5.7 cal/mol/Å(2) in the entire data set. We train regression models to predict the binding affinity from the structural and physicochemical parameters of protein–RNA interfaces. The best fit model with the lowest maximum error is provided with three interface parameters: relative hydrophobicity, conformational change upon binding and relative hydration pattern. This model has been used for predicting the binding affinity on a test data set, generated using mutated structures of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, for which experimentally determined ΔG values of 40 mutations are available. The predicted ΔG(empirical) values highly correlate with the experimental observations. The data set provided in this study should be useful for further development of the binding affinity prediction methods. Moreover, the model developed in this study enhances our understanding on the structural basis of protein–RNA binding affinity and provides a platform to engineer protein–RNA interfaces with desired affinity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6859855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68598552020-12-01 A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity Nithin, Chandran Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad RNA Article Protein–RNA recognition is highly affinity-driven and regulates a wide array of cellular functions. In this study, we have curated a binding affinity data set of 40 protein–RNA complexes, for which at least one unbound partner is available in the docking benchmark. The data set covers a wide affinity range of eight orders of magnitude as well as four different structural classes. On average, we find the complexes with single-stranded RNA have the highest affinity, whereas the complexes with the duplex RNA have the lowest. Nevertheless, free energy gain upon binding is the highest for the complexes with ribosomal proteins and the lowest for the complexes with tRNA with an average of −5.7 cal/mol/Å(2) in the entire data set. We train regression models to predict the binding affinity from the structural and physicochemical parameters of protein–RNA interfaces. The best fit model with the lowest maximum error is provided with three interface parameters: relative hydrophobicity, conformational change upon binding and relative hydration pattern. This model has been used for predicting the binding affinity on a test data set, generated using mutated structures of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, for which experimentally determined ΔG values of 40 mutations are available. The predicted ΔG(empirical) values highly correlate with the experimental observations. The data set provided in this study should be useful for further development of the binding affinity prediction methods. Moreover, the model developed in this study enhances our understanding on the structural basis of protein–RNA binding affinity and provides a platform to engineer protein–RNA interfaces with desired affinity. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6859855/ /pubmed/31395671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.071779.119 Text en © 2019 Nithin et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by the RNA Society for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Nithin, Chandran Mukherjee, Sunandan Bahadur, Ranjit Prasad A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity |
title | A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity |
title_full | A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity |
title_fullStr | A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity |
title_full_unstemmed | A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity |
title_short | A structure-based model for the prediction of protein–RNA binding affinity |
title_sort | structure-based model for the prediction of protein–rna binding affinity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6859855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.071779.119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nithinchandran astructurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity AT mukherjeesunandan astructurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity AT bahadurranjitprasad astructurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity AT nithinchandran structurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity AT mukherjeesunandan structurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity AT bahadurranjitprasad structurebasedmodelforthepredictionofproteinrnabindingaffinity |