Cargando…
Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to inve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18514 |
_version_ | 1783471218342494208 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Keum, Bora Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Seo, Yeon Seok Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Um, Soon Ho Kim, Chang Duck |
author_facet | Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Keum, Bora Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Seo, Yeon Seok Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Um, Soon Ho Kim, Chang Duck |
author_sort | Lee, Jung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to investigate whether compared with propofol/midazolam, etomidate/midazolam causes fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events with noninferior efficacy for screening colonoscopies in patients of all ages. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, we prospectively enrolled 200 patients. The patients were divided into etomidate and propofol groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with fluctuations in vital signs (oxygen desaturation and transient hypotension), adverse events interrupting the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Adverse cardiopulmonary events were more common in the propofol group than the etomidate group (65.0% vs 51.0%, respectively; p=0.045). Forty-six patients (46.0%) in the propofol group and 29 (29.0%) in the etomidate group experienced fluctuations in their vital signs (p=0.013). The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events that interrupted the procedure, including myoclonus, were not significantly different between the two groups (etomidate: 20.0% vs propofol: 11.0%; p=0.079). Both groups had similar sedation-related outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with the propofol groups, the etomidate group had a significantly lower risk of fluctuations in vital signs (odds ratio, 0.427; 95% confidence interval, 0.230 to 0.792; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with using propofol/midazolam, using etomidate/midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages; therefore, we recommend using etomidate/midazolam for colonoscopies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6860030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68600302019-11-27 Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Keum, Bora Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Seo, Yeon Seok Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Um, Soon Ho Kim, Chang Duck Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to investigate whether compared with propofol/midazolam, etomidate/midazolam causes fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events with noninferior efficacy for screening colonoscopies in patients of all ages. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, we prospectively enrolled 200 patients. The patients were divided into etomidate and propofol groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with fluctuations in vital signs (oxygen desaturation and transient hypotension), adverse events interrupting the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Adverse cardiopulmonary events were more common in the propofol group than the etomidate group (65.0% vs 51.0%, respectively; p=0.045). Forty-six patients (46.0%) in the propofol group and 29 (29.0%) in the etomidate group experienced fluctuations in their vital signs (p=0.013). The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events that interrupted the procedure, including myoclonus, were not significantly different between the two groups (etomidate: 20.0% vs propofol: 11.0%; p=0.079). Both groups had similar sedation-related outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with the propofol groups, the etomidate group had a significantly lower risk of fluctuations in vital signs (odds ratio, 0.427; 95% confidence interval, 0.230 to 0.792; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with using propofol/midazolam, using etomidate/midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages; therefore, we recommend using etomidate/midazolam for colonoscopies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019-11 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6860030/ /pubmed/30970436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18514 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Keum, Bora Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Seo, Yeon Seok Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Um, Soon Ho Kim, Chang Duck Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages |
title | Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages |
title_full | Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages |
title_fullStr | Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages |
title_short | Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages |
title_sort | using etomidate and midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejungmin usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT mingeeho usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT keumbora usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT leejaemin usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT kimseunghan usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT choihyuksoon usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT kimeunsun usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT seoyeonseok usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT jeenyoontae usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT chunhoonjai usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT leehongsik usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT umsoonho usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages AT kimchangduck usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages |