Cargando…

Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jung Min, Min, Geeho, Keum, Bora, Lee, Jae Min, Kim, Seung Han, Choi, Hyuk Soon, Kim, Eun Sun, Seo, Yeon Seok, Jeen, Yoon Tae, Chun, Hoon Jai, Lee, Hong Sik, Um, Soon Ho, Kim, Chang Duck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970436
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18514
_version_ 1783471218342494208
author Lee, Jung Min
Min, Geeho
Keum, Bora
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Kim, Eun Sun
Seo, Yeon Seok
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Hong Sik
Um, Soon Ho
Kim, Chang Duck
author_facet Lee, Jung Min
Min, Geeho
Keum, Bora
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Kim, Eun Sun
Seo, Yeon Seok
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Hong Sik
Um, Soon Ho
Kim, Chang Duck
author_sort Lee, Jung Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to investigate whether compared with propofol/midazolam, etomidate/midazolam causes fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events with noninferior efficacy for screening colonoscopies in patients of all ages. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, we prospectively enrolled 200 patients. The patients were divided into etomidate and propofol groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with fluctuations in vital signs (oxygen desaturation and transient hypotension), adverse events interrupting the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Adverse cardiopulmonary events were more common in the propofol group than the etomidate group (65.0% vs 51.0%, respectively; p=0.045). Forty-six patients (46.0%) in the propofol group and 29 (29.0%) in the etomidate group experienced fluctuations in their vital signs (p=0.013). The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events that interrupted the procedure, including myoclonus, were not significantly different between the two groups (etomidate: 20.0% vs propofol: 11.0%; p=0.079). Both groups had similar sedation-related outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with the propofol groups, the etomidate group had a significantly lower risk of fluctuations in vital signs (odds ratio, 0.427; 95% confidence interval, 0.230 to 0.792; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with using propofol/midazolam, using etomidate/midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages; therefore, we recommend using etomidate/midazolam for colonoscopies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6860030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68600302019-11-27 Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages Lee, Jung Min Min, Geeho Keum, Bora Lee, Jae Min Kim, Seung Han Choi, Hyuk Soon Kim, Eun Sun Seo, Yeon Seok Jeen, Yoon Tae Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Hong Sik Um, Soon Ho Kim, Chang Duck Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have demonstrated that etomidate is a safe sedative drug with noninferior sedative effects. In our recent study, we revealed that etomidate/midazolam was more hemodynamically stable than propofol/midazolam in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopies. We aimed to investigate whether compared with propofol/midazolam, etomidate/midazolam causes fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events with noninferior efficacy for screening colonoscopies in patients of all ages. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind study, we prospectively enrolled 200 patients. The patients were divided into etomidate and propofol groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with fluctuations in vital signs (oxygen desaturation and transient hypotension), adverse events interrupting the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Adverse cardiopulmonary events were more common in the propofol group than the etomidate group (65.0% vs 51.0%, respectively; p=0.045). Forty-six patients (46.0%) in the propofol group and 29 (29.0%) in the etomidate group experienced fluctuations in their vital signs (p=0.013). The proportions of patients experiencing adverse events that interrupted the procedure, including myoclonus, were not significantly different between the two groups (etomidate: 20.0% vs propofol: 11.0%; p=0.079). Both groups had similar sedation-related outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with the propofol groups, the etomidate group had a significantly lower risk of fluctuations in vital signs (odds ratio, 0.427; 95% confidence interval, 0.230 to 0.792; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with using propofol/midazolam, using etomidate/midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages; therefore, we recommend using etomidate/midazolam for colonoscopies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019-11 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6860030/ /pubmed/30970436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18514 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jung Min
Min, Geeho
Keum, Bora
Lee, Jae Min
Kim, Seung Han
Choi, Hyuk Soon
Kim, Eun Sun
Seo, Yeon Seok
Jeen, Yoon Tae
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Hong Sik
Um, Soon Ho
Kim, Chang Duck
Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
title Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
title_full Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
title_fullStr Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
title_full_unstemmed Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
title_short Using Etomidate and Midazolam for Screening Colonoscopies Results in More Stable Hemodynamic Responses in Patients of All Ages
title_sort using etomidate and midazolam for screening colonoscopies results in more stable hemodynamic responses in patients of all ages
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970436
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18514
work_keys_str_mv AT leejungmin usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT mingeeho usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT keumbora usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT leejaemin usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT kimseunghan usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT choihyuksoon usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT kimeunsun usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT seoyeonseok usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT jeenyoontae usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT chunhoonjai usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT leehongsik usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT umsoonho usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages
AT kimchangduck usingetomidateandmidazolamforscreeningcolonoscopiesresultsinmorestablehemodynamicresponsesinpatientsofallages