Cargando…

Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain

INTRODUCTION: Many dispatch systems send Advanced Life Support (ALS) resources to patients complaining of abdominal pain even though the majority of these incidents require only Basic Life Support (BLS). With increasing 911-call volume, resource utilization has become more important to ensure that A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abramson, Tiffany M., Sanko, Stephen, Kashani, Saman, Eckstein, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31738724
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44100
_version_ 1783471229927161856
author Abramson, Tiffany M.
Sanko, Stephen
Kashani, Saman
Eckstein, Marc
author_facet Abramson, Tiffany M.
Sanko, Stephen
Kashani, Saman
Eckstein, Marc
author_sort Abramson, Tiffany M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many dispatch systems send Advanced Life Support (ALS) resources to patients complaining of abdominal pain even though the majority of these incidents require only Basic Life Support (BLS). With increasing 911-call volume, resource utilization has become more important to ensure that ALS resources are available for time-critical emergencies. In 2015, a large, urban fire department implemented an internally developed, tiered-dispatch system. Under this system, patients reporting a chief complaint of abdominal pain received the closest BLS ambulance dispatched alone emergency if located within three miles of the incident. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of BLS-only dispatch to abdominal pain by determining the frequency of time-sensitive events. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of electronic health records of one emergency medical service provider agency from May 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were a chief complaint of abdominal pain from a first- or second-party caller, age over 15, and the patient was reported to be alert and breathing normally. The primary outcome was the prevalence of time-sensitive events, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, or airway management. Secondary outcomes were hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg); or a prehospital 12 lead-electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria or a wide complex arrhythmia. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 1,220,820 EMS incidents, of which 33,267 (2.72%) met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 49.9 years (range 16–111, standard deviation [SD] 19.6); 14,556 patients (56.2%) were female. Time-sensitive events occurred in seven cases (0.021%), mean age was 75.3 years (range 30–86, SD18.7); 85.7% were female. Airway management was required in seven cases (0.021%), CPR in six cases (0.018%), and defibrillation in one case (0.003%). Two of the seven (28.6%) cases involved dispatch protocol deviations. Hypotension was present in 240 (0.72%) cases; six (0.018%) cases had 12-lead ECGs meeting STEMI criteria; and no cases demonstrated wide complex arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Among adult 911 patients with a dispatch chief complaint of abdominal pain, time-sensitive events were exceedingly rare. Dispatching a BLS ambulance alone appears to be safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6860400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68604002019-11-25 Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain Abramson, Tiffany M. Sanko, Stephen Kashani, Saman Eckstein, Marc West J Emerg Med Emergency Medical Services INTRODUCTION: Many dispatch systems send Advanced Life Support (ALS) resources to patients complaining of abdominal pain even though the majority of these incidents require only Basic Life Support (BLS). With increasing 911-call volume, resource utilization has become more important to ensure that ALS resources are available for time-critical emergencies. In 2015, a large, urban fire department implemented an internally developed, tiered-dispatch system. Under this system, patients reporting a chief complaint of abdominal pain received the closest BLS ambulance dispatched alone emergency if located within three miles of the incident. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of BLS-only dispatch to abdominal pain by determining the frequency of time-sensitive events. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of electronic health records of one emergency medical service provider agency from May 2015–2018. Inclusion criteria were a chief complaint of abdominal pain from a first- or second-party caller, age over 15, and the patient was reported to be alert and breathing normally. The primary outcome was the prevalence of time-sensitive events, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, or airway management. Secondary outcomes were hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg); or a prehospital 12 lead-electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria or a wide complex arrhythmia. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 1,220,820 EMS incidents, of which 33,267 (2.72%) met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 49.9 years (range 16–111, standard deviation [SD] 19.6); 14,556 patients (56.2%) were female. Time-sensitive events occurred in seven cases (0.021%), mean age was 75.3 years (range 30–86, SD18.7); 85.7% were female. Airway management was required in seven cases (0.021%), CPR in six cases (0.018%), and defibrillation in one case (0.003%). Two of the seven (28.6%) cases involved dispatch protocol deviations. Hypotension was present in 240 (0.72%) cases; six (0.018%) cases had 12-lead ECGs meeting STEMI criteria; and no cases demonstrated wide complex arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Among adult 911 patients with a dispatch chief complaint of abdominal pain, time-sensitive events were exceedingly rare. Dispatching a BLS ambulance alone appears to be safe. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2019-11 2019-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6860400/ /pubmed/31738724 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44100 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Abramson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medical Services
Abramson, Tiffany M.
Sanko, Stephen
Kashani, Saman
Eckstein, Marc
Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain
title Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain
title_full Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain
title_fullStr Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain
title_full_unstemmed Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain
title_short Safety of Tiered-Dispatch for 911 Calls for Abdominal Pain
title_sort safety of tiered-dispatch for 911 calls for abdominal pain
topic Emergency Medical Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31738724
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44100
work_keys_str_mv AT abramsontiffanym safetyoftiereddispatchfor911callsforabdominalpain
AT sankostephen safetyoftiereddispatchfor911callsforabdominalpain
AT kashanisaman safetyoftiereddispatchfor911callsforabdominalpain
AT ecksteinmarc safetyoftiereddispatchfor911callsforabdominalpain