Cargando…
Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)
In a recent publication, I argued that there is a conceptual difference between artificial womb (AW) technology, capable of facilitating gestation ex utero, and neonatal intensive care, providing incubation to neonates born prematurely. One of the reasons I provided for this distinction was that the...
Autor principal: | Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105723 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Artificial womb technology, pregnancy, and EU employment rights
por: Hooton, Victoria, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2019) -
Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2018) -
Abortion & ‘artificial wombs’: would ‘artificial womb’ technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about how to terminate pregnancy in England and Wales?
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2021) -
Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law?
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2019)