Cargando…

Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Meaningful partnering with patients is advocated to enhance care delivery. Little is known about how this is operationalised at the point of care during hospital ward rounds, where decision-making concerning patient care frequently occurs. OBJECTIVE: Describe participation of patients, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redley, Bernice, McTier, Lauren, Botti, Mari, Hutchinson, Alison, Newnham, Harvey, Campbell, Donald, Bucknall, Tracey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292
_version_ 1783471251282460672
author Redley, Bernice
McTier, Lauren
Botti, Mari
Hutchinson, Alison
Newnham, Harvey
Campbell, Donald
Bucknall, Tracey
author_facet Redley, Bernice
McTier, Lauren
Botti, Mari
Hutchinson, Alison
Newnham, Harvey
Campbell, Donald
Bucknall, Tracey
author_sort Redley, Bernice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meaningful partnering with patients is advocated to enhance care delivery. Little is known about how this is operationalised at the point of care during hospital ward rounds, where decision-making concerning patient care frequently occurs. OBJECTIVE: Describe participation of patients, with differing preferences for participation, during ward rounds in acute medical inpatient services. METHODS: Naturalistic, multimethod design. Data were collected using surveys and observations of ward rounds at two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Using convenience sampling, a stratified sample of acute general medical patients were recruited. Prior to observation and interview, patient responses to the Control Preference Scale were used to stratify them into three groups representing diverse participation preferences: active control where the patient makes decisions; shared control where the patient prefers to make decisions jointly with clinicians; and passive control where the patient prefers clinicians make decisions. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients observed over 133 ward rounds, 30.8% (n=16) reported an active control preference for participation in decision-making during ward rounds, 25% (n=13) expressed shared control preference and 44.2% (n=23) expressed low control preference. Patients’ participation was observed in 75% (n=85) of ward rounds, but few rounds (18%, n=20) involved patient contribution to decisions about their care. Clinicians prompted patient participation in 54% of rounds; and in 15% patients initiated their own participation. Thematic analysis of qualitative observation and patient interview data revealed two themes, supporting patient capability and clinician-led opportunity, that contributed to patient participation or non-participation in ward rounds. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in ward rounds was similar for patients irrespective of control preference. This study demonstrates the need to better understand clinician roles in supporting strategies that promote patient participation in day-to-day hospital care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6860730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68607302019-12-03 Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study Redley, Bernice McTier, Lauren Botti, Mari Hutchinson, Alison Newnham, Harvey Campbell, Donald Bucknall, Tracey BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Meaningful partnering with patients is advocated to enhance care delivery. Little is known about how this is operationalised at the point of care during hospital ward rounds, where decision-making concerning patient care frequently occurs. OBJECTIVE: Describe participation of patients, with differing preferences for participation, during ward rounds in acute medical inpatient services. METHODS: Naturalistic, multimethod design. Data were collected using surveys and observations of ward rounds at two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Using convenience sampling, a stratified sample of acute general medical patients were recruited. Prior to observation and interview, patient responses to the Control Preference Scale were used to stratify them into three groups representing diverse participation preferences: active control where the patient makes decisions; shared control where the patient prefers to make decisions jointly with clinicians; and passive control where the patient prefers clinicians make decisions. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients observed over 133 ward rounds, 30.8% (n=16) reported an active control preference for participation in decision-making during ward rounds, 25% (n=13) expressed shared control preference and 44.2% (n=23) expressed low control preference. Patients’ participation was observed in 75% (n=85) of ward rounds, but few rounds (18%, n=20) involved patient contribution to decisions about their care. Clinicians prompted patient participation in 54% of rounds; and in 15% patients initiated their own participation. Thematic analysis of qualitative observation and patient interview data revealed two themes, supporting patient capability and clinician-led opportunity, that contributed to patient participation or non-participation in ward rounds. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in ward rounds was similar for patients irrespective of control preference. This study demonstrates the need to better understand clinician roles in supporting strategies that promote patient participation in day-to-day hospital care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6860730/ /pubmed/29475980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Redley, Bernice
McTier, Lauren
Botti, Mari
Hutchinson, Alison
Newnham, Harvey
Campbell, Donald
Bucknall, Tracey
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
title Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
title_full Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
title_short Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
title_sort patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29475980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292
work_keys_str_mv AT redleybernice patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy
AT mctierlauren patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy
AT bottimari patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy
AT hutchinsonalison patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy
AT newnhamharvey patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy
AT campbelldonald patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy
AT bucknalltracey patientparticipationininpatientwardroundsonacuteinpatientmedicalwardsadescriptivestudy