Cargando…
Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The number of dialysis recipients is growing worldwide, making it important that the full range of patient populations are represented in randomised trials. As trial recruitment has not previously been examined at a global level, we compared the location of trial sites recruiting to larg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31799004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001940 |
_version_ | 1783471283287097344 |
---|---|
author | Smyth, Brendan Trongtrakul, Konlawij Haber, Anna Talbot, B Hawley, Carmel Perkovic, Vlado Woodward, Mark Jardine, Meg |
author_facet | Smyth, Brendan Trongtrakul, Konlawij Haber, Anna Talbot, B Hawley, Carmel Perkovic, Vlado Woodward, Mark Jardine, Meg |
author_sort | Smyth, Brendan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The number of dialysis recipients is growing worldwide, making it important that the full range of patient populations are represented in randomised trials. As trial recruitment has not previously been examined at a global level, we compared the location of trial sites recruiting to large multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in dialysis to the global distribution of dialysis recipients. METHODS: A systematic review (2007–2016) was conducted to identify RCTs enrolling ≥100 dialysis patients from ≥2 sites. The number and location of sites were extracted from manuscripts and trial registration. The proportion of sites from each International Society of Nephrology global region was divided by the proportion of the global dialysis population in that region to determine a ‘representation index’ (RI), where 1.0 indicated that the number of sites was proportionate to the number of dialysis recipients in that region. RESULTS: We identified 180 RCTs, recruiting from 6172 sites in 54 countries. Eastern and Central Europe had the highest RI at 2.45. Other well-represented regions were Western Europe (2.20), North America (2.06), and Russia and newly independent states (1.36). Africa had the lowest RI at 0.05, followed by South Asia (0.08), Latin America (0.15), Middle East (0.27), North-East Asia (0.41), and South-East Asia and Oceania (0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Regions of the world with growing numbers of dialysis patients are poorly represented in large, multicentre RCTs. Efforts to boost trial participation in these regions are required to ensure that generalisable and relevant information is available to local healthcare providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68610952019-12-03 Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review Smyth, Brendan Trongtrakul, Konlawij Haber, Anna Talbot, B Hawley, Carmel Perkovic, Vlado Woodward, Mark Jardine, Meg BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: The number of dialysis recipients is growing worldwide, making it important that the full range of patient populations are represented in randomised trials. As trial recruitment has not previously been examined at a global level, we compared the location of trial sites recruiting to large multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in dialysis to the global distribution of dialysis recipients. METHODS: A systematic review (2007–2016) was conducted to identify RCTs enrolling ≥100 dialysis patients from ≥2 sites. The number and location of sites were extracted from manuscripts and trial registration. The proportion of sites from each International Society of Nephrology global region was divided by the proportion of the global dialysis population in that region to determine a ‘representation index’ (RI), where 1.0 indicated that the number of sites was proportionate to the number of dialysis recipients in that region. RESULTS: We identified 180 RCTs, recruiting from 6172 sites in 54 countries. Eastern and Central Europe had the highest RI at 2.45. Other well-represented regions were Western Europe (2.20), North America (2.06), and Russia and newly independent states (1.36). Africa had the lowest RI at 0.05, followed by South Asia (0.08), Latin America (0.15), Middle East (0.27), North-East Asia (0.41), and South-East Asia and Oceania (0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Regions of the world with growing numbers of dialysis patients are poorly represented in large, multicentre RCTs. Efforts to boost trial participation in these regions are required to ensure that generalisable and relevant information is available to local healthcare providers. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6861095/ /pubmed/31799004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001940 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Smyth, Brendan Trongtrakul, Konlawij Haber, Anna Talbot, B Hawley, Carmel Perkovic, Vlado Woodward, Mark Jardine, Meg Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
title | Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
title_full | Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
title_short | Inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
title_sort | inequities in the global representation of sites participating in large, multicentre dialysis trials: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31799004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smythbrendan inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT trongtrakulkonlawij inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT haberanna inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT talbotb inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT hawleycarmel inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT perkovicvlado inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT woodwardmark inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview AT jardinemeg inequitiesintheglobalrepresentationofsitesparticipatinginlargemulticentredialysistrialsasystematicreview |