Cargando…

Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013

INTRODUCTION: Cambodia’s health equity fund (HEF) is the country’s most significant social security scheme, covering the poorest one-fifth of the national population. During the last two decades, the HEF system was scaled up from an initial two health districts to national coverage of public health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Annear, Peter Leslie, Tayu Lee, John, Khim, Keovathanak, Ir, Por, Moscoe, Ellen, Jordanwood, Tapley, Bossert, Thomas, Nachtnebel, Matthias, Lo, Veasnakiry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001679
_version_ 1783471289886834688
author Annear, Peter Leslie
Tayu Lee, John
Khim, Keovathanak
Ir, Por
Moscoe, Ellen
Jordanwood, Tapley
Bossert, Thomas
Nachtnebel, Matthias
Lo, Veasnakiry
author_facet Annear, Peter Leslie
Tayu Lee, John
Khim, Keovathanak
Ir, Por
Moscoe, Ellen
Jordanwood, Tapley
Bossert, Thomas
Nachtnebel, Matthias
Lo, Veasnakiry
author_sort Annear, Peter Leslie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cambodia’s health equity fund (HEF) is the country’s most significant social security scheme, covering the poorest one-fifth of the national population. During the last two decades, the HEF system was scaled up from an initial two health districts to national coverage of public health facilities. This is the first national study to examine the impact of the HEF on the utilisation of public health facilities. METHODS: We first investigated the level of national HEF population coverage and health service use made by HEF eligible members using an administrative HEF operational dataset. Second, through multilevel interrupted time series analysis of routine monthly utilisation statistics during 2006–2013, we evaluated the impact of the HEF on hospital and health centre utilisation. RESULTS: The proportion of HEF beneficiaries using hospital services in a given year (4.6%) appeared to exceed rates in the general population (3.3%). The introduction of the HEF was associated with: a significant level change in the monthly number of consultations at HCs followed by a gradual slope increase in time trend and a significant level change in the monthly number of deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 15.6% net increase in number of consultations and 5.3% in deliveries in the first year. At RHs: a significant level change in the number of RH inpatient cases, followed by a sustained slope increase; a significant slope increase in the number of outpatient consultations and in the overall number of newborn deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 47.9% net increase in inpatient cases, 24.1% in outpatient cases and 31.4% in deliveries in the first year. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the HEF scheme was associated with increased utilisation of primary and secondary care services by the poor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68611232019-12-03 Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013 Annear, Peter Leslie Tayu Lee, John Khim, Keovathanak Ir, Por Moscoe, Ellen Jordanwood, Tapley Bossert, Thomas Nachtnebel, Matthias Lo, Veasnakiry BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Cambodia’s health equity fund (HEF) is the country’s most significant social security scheme, covering the poorest one-fifth of the national population. During the last two decades, the HEF system was scaled up from an initial two health districts to national coverage of public health facilities. This is the first national study to examine the impact of the HEF on the utilisation of public health facilities. METHODS: We first investigated the level of national HEF population coverage and health service use made by HEF eligible members using an administrative HEF operational dataset. Second, through multilevel interrupted time series analysis of routine monthly utilisation statistics during 2006–2013, we evaluated the impact of the HEF on hospital and health centre utilisation. RESULTS: The proportion of HEF beneficiaries using hospital services in a given year (4.6%) appeared to exceed rates in the general population (3.3%). The introduction of the HEF was associated with: a significant level change in the monthly number of consultations at HCs followed by a gradual slope increase in time trend and a significant level change in the monthly number of deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 15.6% net increase in number of consultations and 5.3% in deliveries in the first year. At RHs: a significant level change in the number of RH inpatient cases, followed by a sustained slope increase; a significant slope increase in the number of outpatient consultations and in the overall number of newborn deliveries. Overall, this was equivalent to a 47.9% net increase in inpatient cases, 24.1% in outpatient cases and 31.4% in deliveries in the first year. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the HEF scheme was associated with increased utilisation of primary and secondary care services by the poor. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6861123/ /pubmed/31798986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001679 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Annear, Peter Leslie
Tayu Lee, John
Khim, Keovathanak
Ir, Por
Moscoe, Ellen
Jordanwood, Tapley
Bossert, Thomas
Nachtnebel, Matthias
Lo, Veasnakiry
Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013
title Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013
title_full Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013
title_fullStr Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013
title_full_unstemmed Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013
title_short Protecting the poor? Impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in Cambodia, 2006-2013
title_sort protecting the poor? impact of the national health equity fund on utilization of government health services in cambodia, 2006-2013
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31798986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001679
work_keys_str_mv AT annearpeterleslie protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT tayuleejohn protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT khimkeovathanak protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT irpor protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT moscoeellen protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT jordanwoodtapley protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT bossertthomas protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT nachtnebelmatthias protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013
AT loveasnakiry protectingthepoorimpactofthenationalhealthequityfundonutilizationofgovernmenthealthservicesincambodia20062013