Cargando…

Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease

SUMMARY: Kümmell’s disease (eponymous name for osteonecrosis and collapse of a vertebral body due to ischemia and non-union of anterior vertebral body wedge fractures after major trauma) cannot heal spontaneously. Bone-filling mesh container (BFMC) can significantly relieve pain, help the correction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Z.-K., Zou, J.-F., He, X.-L., Huang, C.-D., He, C.-J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0656-4
_version_ 1783471336450949120
author Duan, Z.-K.
Zou, J.-F.
He, X.-L.
Huang, C.-D.
He, C.-J.
author_facet Duan, Z.-K.
Zou, J.-F.
He, X.-L.
Huang, C.-D.
He, C.-J.
author_sort Duan, Z.-K.
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Kümmell’s disease (eponymous name for osteonecrosis and collapse of a vertebral body due to ischemia and non-union of anterior vertebral body wedge fractures after major trauma) cannot heal spontaneously. Bone-filling mesh container (BFMC) can significantly relieve pain, help the correction of kyphosis, and may prevent cement leakage. This pilot study may provide the basis for the design of future studies. PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of BFMC and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for treatment of Kümmell’s disease. METHODS: From August 2016 to May 2018, 40 patients with Kümmell’s disease were admitted to Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital. Among them, 20 patients (20 vertebral bodies) received PKP (PKP group) and the other 20 received BFMC (BFMC group). Operation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb’s angle changes, and related complications were recorded. RESULTS: All patients underwent operations successfully. VAS scores and ODI of both groups at each postoperative time point were lower than preoperatively, with statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Postoperative Cobb’s angle of both groups postoperatively was lower than preoperatively (p < 0.05). Cement leakage occurred in eight vertebrae (8/20) in the PKP group and in one vertebra (1/20) in the BFMC group. No complications such as pulmonary embolism, paraplegia, or perioperative death occurred during operation in both groups. Adjacent vertebral refractures occurred in five patients (5/20) in the PKP group and in four patients (4/20) in the BFMC group, with no significant difference in the incidence rate of refractures in both groups but the material is too small to verify statistically. CONCLUSIONS: Both PKP and BFMC technologies can significantly relieve pain and help the correction of kyphosis while treating Kümmell’s disease. Moreover, the BMFC may prevent cement leakage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68613502019-12-03 Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease Duan, Z.-K. Zou, J.-F. He, X.-L. Huang, C.-D. He, C.-J. Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Kümmell’s disease (eponymous name for osteonecrosis and collapse of a vertebral body due to ischemia and non-union of anterior vertebral body wedge fractures after major trauma) cannot heal spontaneously. Bone-filling mesh container (BFMC) can significantly relieve pain, help the correction of kyphosis, and may prevent cement leakage. This pilot study may provide the basis for the design of future studies. PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of BFMC and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for treatment of Kümmell’s disease. METHODS: From August 2016 to May 2018, 40 patients with Kümmell’s disease were admitted to Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital. Among them, 20 patients (20 vertebral bodies) received PKP (PKP group) and the other 20 received BFMC (BFMC group). Operation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb’s angle changes, and related complications were recorded. RESULTS: All patients underwent operations successfully. VAS scores and ODI of both groups at each postoperative time point were lower than preoperatively, with statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Postoperative Cobb’s angle of both groups postoperatively was lower than preoperatively (p < 0.05). Cement leakage occurred in eight vertebrae (8/20) in the PKP group and in one vertebra (1/20) in the BFMC group. No complications such as pulmonary embolism, paraplegia, or perioperative death occurred during operation in both groups. Adjacent vertebral refractures occurred in five patients (5/20) in the PKP group and in four patients (4/20) in the BFMC group, with no significant difference in the incidence rate of refractures in both groups but the material is too small to verify statistically. CONCLUSIONS: Both PKP and BFMC technologies can significantly relieve pain and help the correction of kyphosis while treating Kümmell’s disease. Moreover, the BMFC may prevent cement leakage. Springer London 2019-11-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6861350/ /pubmed/31741066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0656-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duan, Z.-K.
Zou, J.-F.
He, X.-L.
Huang, C.-D.
He, C.-J.
Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease
title Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease
title_full Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease
title_fullStr Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease
title_short Bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating Kümmell’s disease
title_sort bone-filling mesh container versus percutaneous kyphoplasty in treating kümmell’s disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0656-4
work_keys_str_mv AT duanzk bonefillingmeshcontainerversuspercutaneouskyphoplastyintreatingkummellsdisease
AT zoujf bonefillingmeshcontainerversuspercutaneouskyphoplastyintreatingkummellsdisease
AT hexl bonefillingmeshcontainerversuspercutaneouskyphoplastyintreatingkummellsdisease
AT huangcd bonefillingmeshcontainerversuspercutaneouskyphoplastyintreatingkummellsdisease
AT hecj bonefillingmeshcontainerversuspercutaneouskyphoplastyintreatingkummellsdisease