Cargando…
Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions
Differences in the prevalence and presentation of psychiatric illnesses in men and women suggest that neurobiological sex differences confer vulnerability or resilience in these disorders. Rodent behavioral models are critical for understanding the mechanisms of these differences. Reward processing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00736-w |
_version_ | 1783471339497062400 |
---|---|
author | Chowdhury, Tara G. Wallin-Miller, Kathryn G. Rear, Alice A. Park, Junchol Diaz, Vanessa Simon, Nicholas W. Moghaddam, Bita |
author_facet | Chowdhury, Tara G. Wallin-Miller, Kathryn G. Rear, Alice A. Park, Junchol Diaz, Vanessa Simon, Nicholas W. Moghaddam, Bita |
author_sort | Chowdhury, Tara G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Differences in the prevalence and presentation of psychiatric illnesses in men and women suggest that neurobiological sex differences confer vulnerability or resilience in these disorders. Rodent behavioral models are critical for understanding the mechanisms of these differences. Reward processing and punishment avoidance are fundamental dimensions of the symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Here we explored sex differences along these dimensions using multiple and distinct behavioral paradigms. We found no sex difference in reward-guided associative learning but a faster punishment-avoidance learning in females. After learning, females were more sensitive than males to probabilistic punishment but less sensitive when punishment could be avoided with certainty. No sex differences were found in reward-guided cognitive flexibility. Thus, sex differences in goal-directed behaviors emerged selectively when there was an aversive context. These differences were critically sensitive to whether the punishment was certain or unpredictable. Our findings with these new paradigms provide conceptual and practical tools for investigating brain mechanisms that account for sex differences in susceptibility to anxiety and impulsivity. They may also provide insight for understanding the evolution of sex-specific optimal behavioral strategies in dynamic environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68613632019-12-03 Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions Chowdhury, Tara G. Wallin-Miller, Kathryn G. Rear, Alice A. Park, Junchol Diaz, Vanessa Simon, Nicholas W. Moghaddam, Bita Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Article Differences in the prevalence and presentation of psychiatric illnesses in men and women suggest that neurobiological sex differences confer vulnerability or resilience in these disorders. Rodent behavioral models are critical for understanding the mechanisms of these differences. Reward processing and punishment avoidance are fundamental dimensions of the symptoms of psychiatric disorders. Here we explored sex differences along these dimensions using multiple and distinct behavioral paradigms. We found no sex difference in reward-guided associative learning but a faster punishment-avoidance learning in females. After learning, females were more sensitive than males to probabilistic punishment but less sensitive when punishment could be avoided with certainty. No sex differences were found in reward-guided cognitive flexibility. Thus, sex differences in goal-directed behaviors emerged selectively when there was an aversive context. These differences were critically sensitive to whether the punishment was certain or unpredictable. Our findings with these new paradigms provide conceptual and practical tools for investigating brain mechanisms that account for sex differences in susceptibility to anxiety and impulsivity. They may also provide insight for understanding the evolution of sex-specific optimal behavioral strategies in dynamic environments. Springer US 2019-07-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6861363/ /pubmed/31342271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00736-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Chowdhury, Tara G. Wallin-Miller, Kathryn G. Rear, Alice A. Park, Junchol Diaz, Vanessa Simon, Nicholas W. Moghaddam, Bita Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
title | Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
title_full | Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
title_short | Sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
title_sort | sex differences in reward- and punishment-guided actions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00736-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowdhurytarag sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions AT wallinmillerkathryng sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions AT rearalicea sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions AT parkjunchol sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions AT diazvanessa sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions AT simonnicholasw sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions AT moghaddambita sexdifferencesinrewardandpunishmentguidedactions |