Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK

INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant is approved for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior endocrine therapy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Telford, Claire, Bertranou, Evelina, Large, Samuel, Phelps, Hilary, Ekman, Mattias, Livings, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31025302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3
_version_ 1783471348315586560
author Telford, Claire
Bertranou, Evelina
Large, Samuel
Phelps, Hilary
Ekman, Mattias
Livings, Christopher
author_facet Telford, Claire
Bertranou, Evelina
Large, Samuel
Phelps, Hilary
Ekman, Mattias
Livings, Christopher
author_sort Telford, Claire
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant is approved for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior endocrine therapy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant versus comparator treatments in endocrine therapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A three-health-state (progression free, progressed disease, and death) partitioned survival model from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective was developed to extrapolate study data for the cumulative probability of progression-free survival and overall survival to a lifetime (30-year) horizon. Relative comparator data were derived from a systematic literature review-informed network meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were applied to assess the impact of uncertainty in the parameter input values on the results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon (30 years), the incremental cost (British pounds sterling) per patient associated with fulvestrant treatment was £18,867 versus anastrozole, £23,097 versus letrozole, and £17,131 versus tamoxifen, with incremental quality-adjusted life-years of 0.55, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £34,109, £29,827, and £22,532, respectively. The largest difference in costs between fulvestrant and the comparators was related to treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that fulvestrant could potentially be a cost-effective option compared with other endocrine monotherapies (anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen) for treating endocrine therapy-naïve, postmenopausal women with HR+, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68614002019-12-03 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK Telford, Claire Bertranou, Evelina Large, Samuel Phelps, Hilary Ekman, Mattias Livings, Christopher Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant is approved for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior endocrine therapy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant versus comparator treatments in endocrine therapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A three-health-state (progression free, progressed disease, and death) partitioned survival model from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective was developed to extrapolate study data for the cumulative probability of progression-free survival and overall survival to a lifetime (30-year) horizon. Relative comparator data were derived from a systematic literature review-informed network meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were applied to assess the impact of uncertainty in the parameter input values on the results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon (30 years), the incremental cost (British pounds sterling) per patient associated with fulvestrant treatment was £18,867 versus anastrozole, £23,097 versus letrozole, and £17,131 versus tamoxifen, with incremental quality-adjusted life-years of 0.55, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £34,109, £29,827, and £22,532, respectively. The largest difference in costs between fulvestrant and the comparators was related to treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that fulvestrant could potentially be a cost-effective option compared with other endocrine monotherapies (anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen) for treating endocrine therapy-naïve, postmenopausal women with HR+, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6861400/ /pubmed/31025302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Telford, Claire
Bertranou, Evelina
Large, Samuel
Phelps, Hilary
Ekman, Mattias
Livings, Christopher
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of fulvestrant 500 mg in endocrine therapy-naïve postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer in the uk
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31025302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3
work_keys_str_mv AT telfordclaire costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk
AT bertranouevelina costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk
AT largesamuel costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk
AT phelpshilary costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk
AT ekmanmattias costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk
AT livingschristopher costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk