Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK
INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant is approved for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior endocrine therapy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31025302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3 |
_version_ | 1783471348315586560 |
---|---|
author | Telford, Claire Bertranou, Evelina Large, Samuel Phelps, Hilary Ekman, Mattias Livings, Christopher |
author_facet | Telford, Claire Bertranou, Evelina Large, Samuel Phelps, Hilary Ekman, Mattias Livings, Christopher |
author_sort | Telford, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant is approved for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior endocrine therapy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant versus comparator treatments in endocrine therapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A three-health-state (progression free, progressed disease, and death) partitioned survival model from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective was developed to extrapolate study data for the cumulative probability of progression-free survival and overall survival to a lifetime (30-year) horizon. Relative comparator data were derived from a systematic literature review-informed network meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were applied to assess the impact of uncertainty in the parameter input values on the results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon (30 years), the incremental cost (British pounds sterling) per patient associated with fulvestrant treatment was £18,867 versus anastrozole, £23,097 versus letrozole, and £17,131 versus tamoxifen, with incremental quality-adjusted life-years of 0.55, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £34,109, £29,827, and £22,532, respectively. The largest difference in costs between fulvestrant and the comparators was related to treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that fulvestrant could potentially be a cost-effective option compared with other endocrine monotherapies (anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen) for treating endocrine therapy-naïve, postmenopausal women with HR+, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68614002019-12-03 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK Telford, Claire Bertranou, Evelina Large, Samuel Phelps, Hilary Ekman, Mattias Livings, Christopher Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant is approved for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior endocrine therapy. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of fulvestrant versus comparator treatments in endocrine therapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A three-health-state (progression free, progressed disease, and death) partitioned survival model from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective was developed to extrapolate study data for the cumulative probability of progression-free survival and overall survival to a lifetime (30-year) horizon. Relative comparator data were derived from a systematic literature review-informed network meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses were applied to assess the impact of uncertainty in the parameter input values on the results. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon (30 years), the incremental cost (British pounds sterling) per patient associated with fulvestrant treatment was £18,867 versus anastrozole, £23,097 versus letrozole, and £17,131 versus tamoxifen, with incremental quality-adjusted life-years of 0.55, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £34,109, £29,827, and £22,532, respectively. The largest difference in costs between fulvestrant and the comparators was related to treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that fulvestrant could potentially be a cost-effective option compared with other endocrine monotherapies (anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen) for treating endocrine therapy-naïve, postmenopausal women with HR+, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6861400/ /pubmed/31025302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Telford, Claire Bertranou, Evelina Large, Samuel Phelps, Hilary Ekman, Mattias Livings, Christopher Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fulvestrant 500 mg in Endocrine Therapy-Naïve Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of fulvestrant 500 mg in endocrine therapy-naïve postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer in the uk |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31025302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0134-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT telfordclaire costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk AT bertranouevelina costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk AT largesamuel costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk AT phelpshilary costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk AT ekmanmattias costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk AT livingschristopher costeffectivenessanalysisoffulvestrant500mginendocrinetherapynaivepostmenopausalwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveadvancedbreastcancerintheuk |