Cargando…
Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of semaglutide versus dulaglutide, as an add-on to metformin monotherapy, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6 |
_version_ | 1783471350013231104 |
---|---|
author | Johansen, Pierre Håkan-Bloch, Jonas Liu, Aiden R. Bech, Peter G. Persson, Sofie Leiter, Lawrence A. |
author_facet | Johansen, Pierre Håkan-Bloch, Jonas Liu, Aiden R. Bech, Peter G. Persson, Sofie Leiter, Lawrence A. |
author_sort | Johansen, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of semaglutide versus dulaglutide, as an add-on to metformin monotherapy, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D was used to assess the cost effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) versus once-weekly dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) over a 40-year time horizon. Using data from the SUSTAIN 7 trial, which demonstrated comparatively greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), body mass index and systolic blood pressure with semaglutide, compared with dulaglutide, a deterministic base-case and scenario simulation were conducted. The robustness of the results was evaluated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses and 15 deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The base-case analysis indicated that semaglutide is a dominant treatment option, compared with dulaglutide. Semaglutide was associated with lower total costs (Canadian dollars [CAN$]) versus dulaglutide for both low-dose (CAN$113,287 vs. CAN$113,690; cost-saving: CAN$403) and high-dose (CAN$112,983 vs. CAN$113,695; cost-saving: CAN$711) comparisons. Semaglutide resulted in increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and QALY gains, compared with dulaglutide, for both low-dose (11.10 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.04 QALYs) and high-dose (11.12 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.05 QALYs) comparisons. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that for 66–73% of iterations, semaglutide was either dominant or was considered cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAN$50,000. CONCLUSIONS: From a Canadian societal perspective, semaglutide may be a cost-effective treatment option versus dulaglutide in patients with T2D who are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68614072019-12-03 Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada Johansen, Pierre Håkan-Bloch, Jonas Liu, Aiden R. Bech, Peter G. Persson, Sofie Leiter, Lawrence A. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of semaglutide versus dulaglutide, as an add-on to metformin monotherapy, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D was used to assess the cost effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) versus once-weekly dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) over a 40-year time horizon. Using data from the SUSTAIN 7 trial, which demonstrated comparatively greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), body mass index and systolic blood pressure with semaglutide, compared with dulaglutide, a deterministic base-case and scenario simulation were conducted. The robustness of the results was evaluated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses and 15 deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The base-case analysis indicated that semaglutide is a dominant treatment option, compared with dulaglutide. Semaglutide was associated with lower total costs (Canadian dollars [CAN$]) versus dulaglutide for both low-dose (CAN$113,287 vs. CAN$113,690; cost-saving: CAN$403) and high-dose (CAN$112,983 vs. CAN$113,695; cost-saving: CAN$711) comparisons. Semaglutide resulted in increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and QALY gains, compared with dulaglutide, for both low-dose (11.10 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.04 QALYs) and high-dose (11.12 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.05 QALYs) comparisons. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that for 66–73% of iterations, semaglutide was either dominant or was considered cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAN$50,000. CONCLUSIONS: From a Canadian societal perspective, semaglutide may be a cost-effective treatment option versus dulaglutide in patients with T2D who are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6861407/ /pubmed/30927241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Johansen, Pierre Håkan-Bloch, Jonas Liu, Aiden R. Bech, Peter G. Persson, Sofie Leiter, Lawrence A. Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada |
title | Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada |
title_full | Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada |
title_fullStr | Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada |
title_short | Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada |
title_sort | cost effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-weekly dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in canada |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johansenpierre costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada AT hakanblochjonas costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada AT liuaidenr costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada AT bechpeterg costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada AT perssonsofie costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada AT leiterlawrencea costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada |