Cargando…

Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of semaglutide versus dulaglutide, as an add-on to metformin monotherapy, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johansen, Pierre, Håkan-Bloch, Jonas, Liu, Aiden R., Bech, Peter G., Persson, Sofie, Leiter, Lawrence A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6
_version_ 1783471350013231104
author Johansen, Pierre
Håkan-Bloch, Jonas
Liu, Aiden R.
Bech, Peter G.
Persson, Sofie
Leiter, Lawrence A.
author_facet Johansen, Pierre
Håkan-Bloch, Jonas
Liu, Aiden R.
Bech, Peter G.
Persson, Sofie
Leiter, Lawrence A.
author_sort Johansen, Pierre
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of semaglutide versus dulaglutide, as an add-on to metformin monotherapy, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D was used to assess the cost effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) versus once-weekly dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) over a 40-year time horizon. Using data from the SUSTAIN 7 trial, which demonstrated comparatively greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), body mass index and systolic blood pressure with semaglutide, compared with dulaglutide, a deterministic base-case and scenario simulation were conducted. The robustness of the results was evaluated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses and 15 deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The base-case analysis indicated that semaglutide is a dominant treatment option, compared with dulaglutide. Semaglutide was associated with lower total costs (Canadian dollars [CAN$]) versus dulaglutide for both low-dose (CAN$113,287 vs. CAN$113,690; cost-saving: CAN$403) and high-dose (CAN$112,983 vs. CAN$113,695; cost-saving: CAN$711) comparisons. Semaglutide resulted in increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and QALY gains, compared with dulaglutide, for both low-dose (11.10 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.04 QALYs) and high-dose (11.12 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.05 QALYs) comparisons. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that for 66–73% of iterations, semaglutide was either dominant or was considered cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAN$50,000. CONCLUSIONS: From a Canadian societal perspective, semaglutide may be a cost-effective treatment option versus dulaglutide in patients with T2D who are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68614072019-12-03 Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada Johansen, Pierre Håkan-Bloch, Jonas Liu, Aiden R. Bech, Peter G. Persson, Sofie Leiter, Lawrence A. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of semaglutide versus dulaglutide, as an add-on to metformin monotherapy, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), from a Canadian societal perspective. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Cohort Model of T2D was used to assess the cost effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) versus once-weekly dulaglutide (0.75 or 1.5 mg) over a 40-year time horizon. Using data from the SUSTAIN 7 trial, which demonstrated comparatively greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), body mass index and systolic blood pressure with semaglutide, compared with dulaglutide, a deterministic base-case and scenario simulation were conducted. The robustness of the results was evaluated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses and 15 deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The base-case analysis indicated that semaglutide is a dominant treatment option, compared with dulaglutide. Semaglutide was associated with lower total costs (Canadian dollars [CAN$]) versus dulaglutide for both low-dose (CAN$113,287 vs. CAN$113,690; cost-saving: CAN$403) and high-dose (CAN$112,983 vs. CAN$113,695; cost-saving: CAN$711) comparisons. Semaglutide resulted in increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and QALY gains, compared with dulaglutide, for both low-dose (11.10 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.04 QALYs) and high-dose (11.12 vs. 11.07 QALYs; + 0.05 QALYs) comparisons. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that for 66–73% of iterations, semaglutide was either dominant or was considered cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAN$50,000. CONCLUSIONS: From a Canadian societal perspective, semaglutide may be a cost-effective treatment option versus dulaglutide in patients with T2D who are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6861407/ /pubmed/30927241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Johansen, Pierre
Håkan-Bloch, Jonas
Liu, Aiden R.
Bech, Peter G.
Persson, Sofie
Leiter, Lawrence A.
Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
title Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
title_full Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
title_fullStr Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
title_short Cost Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Once-Weekly Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Canada
title_sort cost effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-weekly dulaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in canada
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0131-6
work_keys_str_mv AT johansenpierre costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada
AT hakanblochjonas costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada
AT liuaidenr costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada
AT bechpeterg costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada
AT perssonsofie costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada
AT leiterlawrencea costeffectivenessofonceweeklysemaglutideversusonceweeklydulaglutideinthetreatmentoftype2diabetesincanada