Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)

BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitor monotherapy is a simplified treatment strategy for virally suppressed HIV-positive patients that has the potential for cost savings, as fewer drugs are used than with combination therapy. However, evidence for its economic value is limited. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garay, Osvaldo Ulises, Nishimwe, Marie Libérée, Bousmah, Marwân-al-Qays, Janah, Asmaa, Girard, Pierre-Marie, Chêne, Geneviève, Moinot, Laetitia, Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis, Meynard, Jean-Luc, Spire, Bruno, Boyer, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0130-7
_version_ 1783471350485090304
author Garay, Osvaldo Ulises
Nishimwe, Marie Libérée
Bousmah, Marwân-al-Qays
Janah, Asmaa
Girard, Pierre-Marie
Chêne, Geneviève
Moinot, Laetitia
Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis
Meynard, Jean-Luc
Spire, Bruno
Boyer, Sylvie
author_facet Garay, Osvaldo Ulises
Nishimwe, Marie Libérée
Bousmah, Marwân-al-Qays
Janah, Asmaa
Girard, Pierre-Marie
Chêne, Geneviève
Moinot, Laetitia
Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis
Meynard, Jean-Luc
Spire, Bruno
Boyer, Sylvie
author_sort Garay, Osvaldo Ulises
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitor monotherapy is a simplified treatment strategy for virally suppressed HIV-positive patients that has the potential for cost savings, as fewer drugs are used than with combination therapy. However, evidence for its economic value is limited. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy followed by treatment intensification in case of viral load rebound versus combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir in HIV-1 infected patients with viral suppression in the ANRS 140 DREAM trial. METHODS: DREAM was conducted in 36 French Hospitals between 2009 and 2013. For each treatment strategy, we estimated the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted mean costs (in €, year 2010 values) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient, as well as incremental costs and QALYs per patient. We then assessed uncertainty using the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, scenario analyses and cost-effectiveness price-threshold (CEPT) analysis. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis considering 2009–2013 antiretroviral drug (ARV) prices, adjusted incremental costs and QALYs were − €3296 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 5202 to − 1391) and 0.006 (95% CI − 0.021 to 0.033), respectively, over 2 years, suggesting that monotherapy was cost-effective with a probability of 100% at various cost-effectiveness thresholds. In scenario analyses considering 2018 ARV prices, monotherapy remained cost-effective but with a lower probability (94% vs. 100% in the base-case analysis). The current price of cART would have to decrease by 34% to be cost-effective with a probability of 95%. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy appears to be cost-effective compared with cART for virologically suppressed HIV-positive patients in France. CEPT analysis is a useful tool to identify the preferred strategy to adopt given that ARV prices change rapidly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00946595. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0130-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68614102019-12-03 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM) Garay, Osvaldo Ulises Nishimwe, Marie Libérée Bousmah, Marwân-al-Qays Janah, Asmaa Girard, Pierre-Marie Chêne, Geneviève Moinot, Laetitia Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis Meynard, Jean-Luc Spire, Bruno Boyer, Sylvie Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitor monotherapy is a simplified treatment strategy for virally suppressed HIV-positive patients that has the potential for cost savings, as fewer drugs are used than with combination therapy. However, evidence for its economic value is limited. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy followed by treatment intensification in case of viral load rebound versus combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir in HIV-1 infected patients with viral suppression in the ANRS 140 DREAM trial. METHODS: DREAM was conducted in 36 French Hospitals between 2009 and 2013. For each treatment strategy, we estimated the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted mean costs (in €, year 2010 values) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient, as well as incremental costs and QALYs per patient. We then assessed uncertainty using the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, scenario analyses and cost-effectiveness price-threshold (CEPT) analysis. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis considering 2009–2013 antiretroviral drug (ARV) prices, adjusted incremental costs and QALYs were − €3296 (95% confidence interval [CI] − 5202 to − 1391) and 0.006 (95% CI − 0.021 to 0.033), respectively, over 2 years, suggesting that monotherapy was cost-effective with a probability of 100% at various cost-effectiveness thresholds. In scenario analyses considering 2018 ARV prices, monotherapy remained cost-effective but with a lower probability (94% vs. 100% in the base-case analysis). The current price of cART would have to decrease by 34% to be cost-effective with a probability of 95%. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy appears to be cost-effective compared with cART for virologically suppressed HIV-positive patients in France. CEPT analysis is a useful tool to identify the preferred strategy to adopt given that ARV prices change rapidly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00946595. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-019-0130-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6861410/ /pubmed/30968368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0130-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Garay, Osvaldo Ulises
Nishimwe, Marie Libérée
Bousmah, Marwân-al-Qays
Janah, Asmaa
Girard, Pierre-Marie
Chêne, Geneviève
Moinot, Laetitia
Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis
Meynard, Jean-Luc
Spire, Bruno
Boyer, Sylvie
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus standard combination antiretroviral therapy in hiv-1 infected patients with viral suppression in france (anrs 140 dream)
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0130-7
work_keys_str_mv AT garayosvaldoulises costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT nishimwemarieliberee costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT bousmahmarwanalqays costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT janahasmaa costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT girardpierremarie costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT chenegenevieve costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT moinotlaetitia costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT sagaonteyssierluis costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT meynardjeanluc costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT spirebruno costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream
AT boyersylvie costeffectivenessanalysisoflopinavirritonavirmonotherapyversusstandardcombinationantiretroviraltherapyinhiv1infectedpatientswithviralsuppressioninfranceanrs140dream