Cargando…
Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions
Research has started to acknowledge the importance of emotions for complex learning and cognitive performance. However, research on epistemic emotions has only recently become more prominent. Research in educational psychology in particular has mostly focused on examining achievement emotions instea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31780990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474 |
_version_ | 1783471358228824064 |
---|---|
author | Vogl, Elisabeth Pekrun, Reinhard Murayama, Kou Loderer, Kristina Schubert, Sandra |
author_facet | Vogl, Elisabeth Pekrun, Reinhard Murayama, Kou Loderer, Kristina Schubert, Sandra |
author_sort | Vogl, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research has started to acknowledge the importance of emotions for complex learning and cognitive performance. However, research on epistemic emotions has only recently become more prominent. Research in educational psychology in particular has mostly focused on examining achievement emotions instead of epistemic emotions. Furthermore, only few studies have addressed functional mechanisms underlying multiple different epistemic emotions simultaneously, and only one study has systematically compared the origins and effects of epistemic emotions with other emotions relevant to knowledge generation (i.e., achievement emotions; Vogl et al., 2019). The present article aimed to replicate the findings from Vogl et al. (2019) exploring within-person interrelations, origins, and outcomes of the epistemic emotions surprise, curiosity, and confusion, and the achievement emotions pride and shame, as well as to analyze their robustness and generalizability across two different study settings (online; Study 1, n = 169 vs. lab; Study 2, n = 79). In addition, the previous findings by Vogl et al. (2019, Study 3) and the present two new studies were meta-analytically integrated to consolidate evidence on origins and outcomes of epistemic emotions. The results of the two new studies largely replicated the findings by Vogl et al. (2019). Combined with the meta-analytic results, the findings confirm distinct patterns of antecedents for epistemic vs. achievement emotions: Pride and shame were more strongly associated with the correctness of a person’s answer (i.e., accuracy), whereas surprise, curiosity, and confusion were more strongly related to incorrect responses a person was confident in (i.e., high-confidence errors) producing cognitive incongruity. Furthermore, in contrast to achievement emotions, epistemic emotions had positive effects on the exploration of knowledge. Implications for research and practice are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68614432019-11-28 Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions Vogl, Elisabeth Pekrun, Reinhard Murayama, Kou Loderer, Kristina Schubert, Sandra Front Psychol Psychology Research has started to acknowledge the importance of emotions for complex learning and cognitive performance. However, research on epistemic emotions has only recently become more prominent. Research in educational psychology in particular has mostly focused on examining achievement emotions instead of epistemic emotions. Furthermore, only few studies have addressed functional mechanisms underlying multiple different epistemic emotions simultaneously, and only one study has systematically compared the origins and effects of epistemic emotions with other emotions relevant to knowledge generation (i.e., achievement emotions; Vogl et al., 2019). The present article aimed to replicate the findings from Vogl et al. (2019) exploring within-person interrelations, origins, and outcomes of the epistemic emotions surprise, curiosity, and confusion, and the achievement emotions pride and shame, as well as to analyze their robustness and generalizability across two different study settings (online; Study 1, n = 169 vs. lab; Study 2, n = 79). In addition, the previous findings by Vogl et al. (2019, Study 3) and the present two new studies were meta-analytically integrated to consolidate evidence on origins and outcomes of epistemic emotions. The results of the two new studies largely replicated the findings by Vogl et al. (2019). Combined with the meta-analytic results, the findings confirm distinct patterns of antecedents for epistemic vs. achievement emotions: Pride and shame were more strongly associated with the correctness of a person’s answer (i.e., accuracy), whereas surprise, curiosity, and confusion were more strongly related to incorrect responses a person was confident in (i.e., high-confidence errors) producing cognitive incongruity. Furthermore, in contrast to achievement emotions, epistemic emotions had positive effects on the exploration of knowledge. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6861443/ /pubmed/31780990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474 Text en Copyright © 2019 Vogl, Pekrun, Murayama, Loderer and Schubert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Vogl, Elisabeth Pekrun, Reinhard Murayama, Kou Loderer, Kristina Schubert, Sandra Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions |
title | Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions |
title_full | Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions |
title_fullStr | Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions |
title_full_unstemmed | Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions |
title_short | Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions |
title_sort | surprise, curiosity, and confusion promote knowledge exploration: evidence for robust effects of epistemic emotions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31780990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voglelisabeth surprisecuriosityandconfusionpromoteknowledgeexplorationevidenceforrobusteffectsofepistemicemotions AT pekrunreinhard surprisecuriosityandconfusionpromoteknowledgeexplorationevidenceforrobusteffectsofepistemicemotions AT murayamakou surprisecuriosityandconfusionpromoteknowledgeexplorationevidenceforrobusteffectsofepistemicemotions AT lodererkristina surprisecuriosityandconfusionpromoteknowledgeexplorationevidenceforrobusteffectsofepistemicemotions AT schubertsandra surprisecuriosityandconfusionpromoteknowledgeexplorationevidenceforrobusteffectsofepistemicemotions |