Cargando…

Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics

BACKGROUND: Point of Care (POC) diagnostics are an essential component of modern medicine and are employed in a variety of clinical disciplines to improve patient outcomes and provider efficiency. Despite these benefits, there are aspects of POC testing which may still hold room for improvement. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quig, Karalee, Wheatley, Elizabeth G, O'Hara, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31814781
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S223667
_version_ 1783471379159449600
author Quig, Karalee
Wheatley, Elizabeth G
O'Hara, Matthew
author_facet Quig, Karalee
Wheatley, Elizabeth G
O'Hara, Matthew
author_sort Quig, Karalee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point of Care (POC) diagnostics are an essential component of modern medicine and are employed in a variety of clinical disciplines to improve patient outcomes and provider efficiency. Despite these benefits, there are aspects of POC testing which may still hold room for improvement. In the present study, a group of healthcare professionals familiar with different facets of blood-based POC testing provided their perspectives on the benefits and challenges of POC testing within their respective fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from April to June 2019, in Colorado, United States of America. Five healthcare professionals, each working in a distinct field (anesthesiology, nursing, emergency medicine, trauma surgery, and POC management) were interviewed. Results from each of the interviews were transcribed as qualitative perspectives on POC diagnostics. DISCUSSION: The general consensus among participants in this study is that POC testing is tremendously beneficial, providing rapid test results, increased access to diagnostics, and improvements in hospital efficiency. However, significant challenges remain in blood-based POC diagnostics, particularly in maintaining sample quality, due to the fact that devices used for sample acquisition and handling are not designed for POC. This raises the possibility for interferents like hemolysis to occur, which may alter diagnostic results. Errors in POC diagnostics, whether due to sample, operator, or instrument error, may cause providers to lose confidence in the test. This lack of confidence can lead to duplicate testing and delayed patient diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The perspectives presented in this study suggest there is a significant need for improvement in the pre-analytical phase of POC testing, and that current practice employs specimen collection technology not designed for POC. Therefore, one hypothesis is that the introduction of a collection device designed specifically for POC could reduce pre-analytical errors, standardize sample quality, improve efficiency, and further benefit patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68615302019-12-06 Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics Quig, Karalee Wheatley, Elizabeth G O'Hara, Matthew Open Access Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Point of Care (POC) diagnostics are an essential component of modern medicine and are employed in a variety of clinical disciplines to improve patient outcomes and provider efficiency. Despite these benefits, there are aspects of POC testing which may still hold room for improvement. In the present study, a group of healthcare professionals familiar with different facets of blood-based POC testing provided their perspectives on the benefits and challenges of POC testing within their respective fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from April to June 2019, in Colorado, United States of America. Five healthcare professionals, each working in a distinct field (anesthesiology, nursing, emergency medicine, trauma surgery, and POC management) were interviewed. Results from each of the interviews were transcribed as qualitative perspectives on POC diagnostics. DISCUSSION: The general consensus among participants in this study is that POC testing is tremendously beneficial, providing rapid test results, increased access to diagnostics, and improvements in hospital efficiency. However, significant challenges remain in blood-based POC diagnostics, particularly in maintaining sample quality, due to the fact that devices used for sample acquisition and handling are not designed for POC. This raises the possibility for interferents like hemolysis to occur, which may alter diagnostic results. Errors in POC diagnostics, whether due to sample, operator, or instrument error, may cause providers to lose confidence in the test. This lack of confidence can lead to duplicate testing and delayed patient diagnoses. CONCLUSION: The perspectives presented in this study suggest there is a significant need for improvement in the pre-analytical phase of POC testing, and that current practice employs specimen collection technology not designed for POC. Therefore, one hypothesis is that the introduction of a collection device designed specifically for POC could reduce pre-analytical errors, standardize sample quality, improve efficiency, and further benefit patient care. Dove 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6861530/ /pubmed/31814781 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S223667 Text en © 2019 Quig et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Quig, Karalee
Wheatley, Elizabeth G
O'Hara, Matthew
Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics
title Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics
title_full Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics
title_fullStr Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics
title_short Perspectives On Blood-Based Point-Of-Care Diagnostics
title_sort perspectives on blood-based point-of-care diagnostics
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31814781
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S223667
work_keys_str_mv AT quigkaralee perspectivesonbloodbasedpointofcarediagnostics
AT wheatleyelizabethg perspectivesonbloodbasedpointofcarediagnostics
AT oharamatthew perspectivesonbloodbasedpointofcarediagnostics