Cargando…
Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z |
_version_ | 1783471381527134208 |
---|---|
author | Ong, Hui Ling Sokolova, Inna Bekarma, Holly Curtis, Claire Macdonald, Alastair Agur, Wael |
author_facet | Ong, Hui Ling Sokolova, Inna Bekarma, Holly Curtis, Claire Macdonald, Alastair Agur, Wael |
author_sort | Ong, Hui Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients’ views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS: The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0–29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The ‘informed’ subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the ‘uncertainty’ subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing ‘safety’ issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker ‘recovery’. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing ‘efficacy’ as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION: SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68615402019-12-03 Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery Ong, Hui Ling Sokolova, Inna Bekarma, Holly Curtis, Claire Macdonald, Alastair Agur, Wael Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients’ views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS: The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0–29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The ‘informed’ subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the ‘uncertainty’ subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing ‘safety’ issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker ‘recovery’. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing ‘efficacy’ as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION: SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6861540/ /pubmed/31377841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ong, Hui Ling Sokolova, Inna Bekarma, Holly Curtis, Claire Macdonald, Alastair Agur, Wael Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
title | Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
title_full | Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
title_fullStr | Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
title_short | Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
title_sort | development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (sui-pda©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onghuiling developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery AT sokolovainna developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery AT bekarmaholly developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery AT curtisclaire developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery AT macdonaldalastair developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery AT agurwael developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery AT developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery |