Cargando…

Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Hui Ling, Sokolova, Inna, Bekarma, Holly, Curtis, Claire, Macdonald, Alastair, Agur, Wael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z
_version_ 1783471381527134208
author Ong, Hui Ling
Sokolova, Inna
Bekarma, Holly
Curtis, Claire
Macdonald, Alastair
Agur, Wael
author_facet Ong, Hui Ling
Sokolova, Inna
Bekarma, Holly
Curtis, Claire
Macdonald, Alastair
Agur, Wael
author_sort Ong, Hui Ling
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients’ views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS: The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0–29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The ‘informed’ subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the ‘uncertainty’ subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing ‘safety’ issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker ‘recovery’. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing ‘efficacy’ as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION: SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68615402019-12-03 Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery Ong, Hui Ling Sokolova, Inna Bekarma, Holly Curtis, Claire Macdonald, Alastair Agur, Wael Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS: From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients’ views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS: The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0–29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The ‘informed’ subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the ‘uncertainty’ subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing ‘safety’ issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker ‘recovery’. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing ‘efficacy’ as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION: SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-03 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6861540/ /pubmed/31377841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ong, Hui Ling
Sokolova, Inna
Bekarma, Holly
Curtis, Claire
Macdonald, Alastair
Agur, Wael
Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
title Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
title_full Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
title_fullStr Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
title_full_unstemmed Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
title_short Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
title_sort development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (sui-pda©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z
work_keys_str_mv AT onghuiling developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery
AT sokolovainna developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery
AT bekarmaholly developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery
AT curtisclaire developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery
AT macdonaldalastair developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery
AT agurwael developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery
AT developmentvalidationandinitialevaluationofpatientdecisionaidsuipdaforwomenconsideringstressurinaryincontinencesurgery