Cargando…
Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme
The level of prediction error in the brain age estimation frameworks is associated with the authenticity of statistical inference on the basis of regression models. In this paper, we present an efficacious and plain bias-adjustment scheme using chronological age as a covariate through the training s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102063 |
_version_ | 1783471386257260544 |
---|---|
author | Beheshti, Iman Nugent, Scott Potvin, Olivier Duchesne, Simon |
author_facet | Beheshti, Iman Nugent, Scott Potvin, Olivier Duchesne, Simon |
author_sort | Beheshti, Iman |
collection | PubMed |
description | The level of prediction error in the brain age estimation frameworks is associated with the authenticity of statistical inference on the basis of regression models. In this paper, we present an efficacious and plain bias-adjustment scheme using chronological age as a covariate through the training set for downgrading the prediction bias in a Brain-age estimation framework. We applied proposed bias-adjustment scheme coupled by a machine learning-based brain age framework on a large set of metabolic brain features acquired from 675 cognitively unimpaired adults through fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography data as the training set to build a robust Brain-age estimation framework. Then, we tested the reliability of proposed bias-adjustment scheme on 75 cognitively unimpaired adults, 561 mild cognitive impairment patients as well as 362 Alzheimer's disease patients as independent test sets. Using the proposed method, we gained a strong R(2) of 0.81 between the chronological age and brain estimated age, as well as an excellent mean absolute error of 2.66 years on 75 cognitively unimpaired adults as an independent set; whereas an R(2) of 0.24 and a mean absolute error of 4.71 years was achieved without bias-adjustment. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed bias-adjustment scheme has a strong capability to diminish prediction error in brain age estimation frameworks for clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6861562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68615622019-11-22 Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme Beheshti, Iman Nugent, Scott Potvin, Olivier Duchesne, Simon Neuroimage Clin Regular Article The level of prediction error in the brain age estimation frameworks is associated with the authenticity of statistical inference on the basis of regression models. In this paper, we present an efficacious and plain bias-adjustment scheme using chronological age as a covariate through the training set for downgrading the prediction bias in a Brain-age estimation framework. We applied proposed bias-adjustment scheme coupled by a machine learning-based brain age framework on a large set of metabolic brain features acquired from 675 cognitively unimpaired adults through fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography data as the training set to build a robust Brain-age estimation framework. Then, we tested the reliability of proposed bias-adjustment scheme on 75 cognitively unimpaired adults, 561 mild cognitive impairment patients as well as 362 Alzheimer's disease patients as independent test sets. Using the proposed method, we gained a strong R(2) of 0.81 between the chronological age and brain estimated age, as well as an excellent mean absolute error of 2.66 years on 75 cognitively unimpaired adults as an independent set; whereas an R(2) of 0.24 and a mean absolute error of 4.71 years was achieved without bias-adjustment. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed bias-adjustment scheme has a strong capability to diminish prediction error in brain age estimation frameworks for clinical settings. Elsevier 2019-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6861562/ /pubmed/31795063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102063 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Beheshti, Iman Nugent, Scott Potvin, Olivier Duchesne, Simon Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme |
title | Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme |
title_full | Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme |
title_fullStr | Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme |
title_full_unstemmed | Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme |
title_short | Bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: A robust scheme |
title_sort | bias-adjustment in neuroimaging-based brain age frameworks: a robust scheme |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beheshtiiman biasadjustmentinneuroimagingbasedbrainageframeworksarobustscheme AT nugentscott biasadjustmentinneuroimagingbasedbrainageframeworksarobustscheme AT potvinolivier biasadjustmentinneuroimagingbasedbrainageframeworksarobustscheme AT duchesnesimon biasadjustmentinneuroimagingbasedbrainageframeworksarobustscheme |