Cargando…

The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities

Recent land management policies around the world have experienced a broader political push to resolve forest and land tenure conflict through agrarian reform policy. As a result, conservation bureaucracies are responding with both formal and informal interventions to acknowledge the role of people i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahide, Muhammad A.K., Fisher, Micah R., Maryudi, Ahmad, Wong, Grace Yee, Supratman, Supratman, Alam, Syamsu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.022
_version_ 1783471396222926848
author Sahide, Muhammad A.K.
Fisher, Micah R.
Maryudi, Ahmad
Wong, Grace Yee
Supratman, Supratman
Alam, Syamsu
author_facet Sahide, Muhammad A.K.
Fisher, Micah R.
Maryudi, Ahmad
Wong, Grace Yee
Supratman, Supratman
Alam, Syamsu
author_sort Sahide, Muhammad A.K.
collection PubMed
description Recent land management policies around the world have experienced a broader political push to resolve forest and land tenure conflict through agrarian reform policy. As a result, conservation bureaucracies are responding with both formal and informal interventions to acknowledge the role of people in forests. In this methods paper, we provide a closer examination of the ways that conservation bureaucracies apply their political capacity in negotiating forest and land tenure conflicts. Our proposed method measures both the capacity and actions of conservation bureaucracies, combining formal dimensions (such as of legal status, budget availability, and the type of organization unit) with informal dimensions (including ways of gaining authority, donors and funding, and trust). The framing is rooted in theories of bureaucratic politics, and while culled from rich empirical experiences from Indonesia, the proposed method is also applicable in examining bureaucratic politics in other natural resource governance contexts. • We develop a method rooted in bureaucratic politics to measure the capacities of conservation agencies to manage forest land tenure conflict; • The proposed typology guides forest and land use policy researchers to incorporate emergent governance issues such as land tenure reform into their assessments of changing conservation bureaucracies; • The can be adapted for examination of bureaucratic capacities and actions in other contested natural resource contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6861612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68616122019-11-22 The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities Sahide, Muhammad A.K. Fisher, Micah R. Maryudi, Ahmad Wong, Grace Yee Supratman, Supratman Alam, Syamsu MethodsX Social Science Recent land management policies around the world have experienced a broader political push to resolve forest and land tenure conflict through agrarian reform policy. As a result, conservation bureaucracies are responding with both formal and informal interventions to acknowledge the role of people in forests. In this methods paper, we provide a closer examination of the ways that conservation bureaucracies apply their political capacity in negotiating forest and land tenure conflicts. Our proposed method measures both the capacity and actions of conservation bureaucracies, combining formal dimensions (such as of legal status, budget availability, and the type of organization unit) with informal dimensions (including ways of gaining authority, donors and funding, and trust). The framing is rooted in theories of bureaucratic politics, and while culled from rich empirical experiences from Indonesia, the proposed method is also applicable in examining bureaucratic politics in other natural resource governance contexts. • We develop a method rooted in bureaucratic politics to measure the capacities of conservation agencies to manage forest land tenure conflict; • The proposed typology guides forest and land use policy researchers to incorporate emergent governance issues such as land tenure reform into their assessments of changing conservation bureaucracies; • The can be adapted for examination of bureaucratic capacities and actions in other contested natural resource contexts. Elsevier 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6861612/ /pubmed/31763186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.022 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Social Science
Sahide, Muhammad A.K.
Fisher, Micah R.
Maryudi, Ahmad
Wong, Grace Yee
Supratman, Supratman
Alam, Syamsu
The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities
title The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities
title_full The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities
title_fullStr The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities
title_full_unstemmed The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities
title_short The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities
title_sort bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: a typology of capacities
topic Social Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6861612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31763186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.022
work_keys_str_mv AT sahidemuhammadak thebureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT fishermicahr thebureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT maryudiahmad thebureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT wonggraceyee thebureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT supratmansupratman thebureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT alamsyamsu thebureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT sahidemuhammadak bureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT fishermicahr bureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT maryudiahmad bureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT wonggraceyee bureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT supratmansupratman bureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities
AT alamsyamsu bureaucraticpoliticsofconservationingoverninglandconflictatypologyofcapacities