Cargando…
Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Unlike other World Health Organization evidence reviews, the systematic review on mental disorders could not provide a quantitative estimate of the effect of environmental noise. With that in mind, we aimed to update it with additional studies published through to 18 August 2019 in order to allow fo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214134 |
_version_ | 1783471472676700160 |
---|---|
author | Dzhambov, Angel M. Lercher, Peter |
author_facet | Dzhambov, Angel M. Lercher, Peter |
author_sort | Dzhambov, Angel M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Unlike other World Health Organization evidence reviews, the systematic review on mental disorders could not provide a quantitative estimate of the effect of environmental noise. With that in mind, we aimed to update it with additional studies published through to 18 August 2019 in order to allow for a formal meta-analysis of the association of residential road traffic noise with anxiety and depression. The quality effects and random effects estimators were used for meta-analysis and the robustness of findings was tested in several sensitivity analyses. Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which we extracted 15 estimates for depression (n = 1,201,168) and five for anxiety (n = 372,079). Almost all studies were cross-sectional and the risk of bias in them was generally high. We found 4% (95% CI: −3%, 11%) higher odds of depression and 12% (95% CI: −4%, 30%) of anxiety associated with a 10 dB(A) increase in day–evening–night noise level (L(den)). Both models suffered from moderate heterogeneity (55% and 54%), but there was evidence of publication bias only in the depression model. These findings were robust with no evidence of study-level moderators. A sensitivity analysis on an alternative set of categorically-reported estimates supported a linear relationship between L(den) and depression. Taking into account an overall quality assessment for the included studies, we conclude that there is evidence of “very low” quality that increasing exposure to road traffic noise may be associated with depression and anxiety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6862094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68620942019-12-05 Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dzhambov, Angel M. Lercher, Peter Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Unlike other World Health Organization evidence reviews, the systematic review on mental disorders could not provide a quantitative estimate of the effect of environmental noise. With that in mind, we aimed to update it with additional studies published through to 18 August 2019 in order to allow for a formal meta-analysis of the association of residential road traffic noise with anxiety and depression. The quality effects and random effects estimators were used for meta-analysis and the robustness of findings was tested in several sensitivity analyses. Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which we extracted 15 estimates for depression (n = 1,201,168) and five for anxiety (n = 372,079). Almost all studies were cross-sectional and the risk of bias in them was generally high. We found 4% (95% CI: −3%, 11%) higher odds of depression and 12% (95% CI: −4%, 30%) of anxiety associated with a 10 dB(A) increase in day–evening–night noise level (L(den)). Both models suffered from moderate heterogeneity (55% and 54%), but there was evidence of publication bias only in the depression model. These findings were robust with no evidence of study-level moderators. A sensitivity analysis on an alternative set of categorically-reported estimates supported a linear relationship between L(den) and depression. Taking into account an overall quality assessment for the included studies, we conclude that there is evidence of “very low” quality that increasing exposure to road traffic noise may be associated with depression and anxiety. MDPI 2019-10-27 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6862094/ /pubmed/31717834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214134 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Dzhambov, Angel M. Lercher, Peter Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Depression/Anxiety: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | road traffic noise exposure and depression/anxiety: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31717834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dzhambovangelm roadtrafficnoiseexposureanddepressionanxietyanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lercherpeter roadtrafficnoiseexposureanddepressionanxietyanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |