Cargando…

Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity

The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Minshan, Liang, Long, Sun, Wu, Liu, Guang Wei, Yin, Xunlu, Han, Tao, Wei, Xu, Zhu, Liguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8105
_version_ 1783471523483353088
author Feng, Minshan
Liang, Long
Sun, Wu
Liu, Guang Wei
Yin, Xunlu
Han, Tao
Wei, Xu
Zhu, Liguo
author_facet Feng, Minshan
Liang, Long
Sun, Wu
Liu, Guang Wei
Yin, Xunlu
Han, Tao
Wei, Xu
Zhu, Liguo
author_sort Feng, Minshan
collection PubMed
description The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was received. The motion of the cervical spine in all directions was measured using the OMCS and CROM devices. Reproducibility of data was assessed using the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Validity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) in combination with Pearson's correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plot were presented for the two measurement methods. The range of motion (ROM) was measured by using the OMCS and the CROM device during the same session. Both procedures evidenced high ICCs [OMCS: ICC (1,2) =0.802–0.981; CROM device: ICC (1,2) =0.768–0.948], low SEM values (OMCS: 0.98°-1.38°; CROM device: 1.04°-2.45°) and low MDC values (OMCS: 2.72°-3.81°; CROM device: 2.89°-6.78°). A high R(2) (0.568–0.882) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (0.753–0.939) were determined. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that most of the data were within the 95% consistency limit. In summary, the OMCS has good repeatability and validity when measuring CROM and is an effective way to evaluate cervical vertebral range of motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6862302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68623022019-11-27 Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity Feng, Minshan Liang, Long Sun, Wu Liu, Guang Wei Yin, Xunlu Han, Tao Wei, Xu Zhu, Liguo Exp Ther Med Articles The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was received. The motion of the cervical spine in all directions was measured using the OMCS and CROM devices. Reproducibility of data was assessed using the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Validity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) in combination with Pearson's correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plot were presented for the two measurement methods. The range of motion (ROM) was measured by using the OMCS and the CROM device during the same session. Both procedures evidenced high ICCs [OMCS: ICC (1,2) =0.802–0.981; CROM device: ICC (1,2) =0.768–0.948], low SEM values (OMCS: 0.98°-1.38°; CROM device: 1.04°-2.45°) and low MDC values (OMCS: 2.72°-3.81°; CROM device: 2.89°-6.78°). A high R(2) (0.568–0.882) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (0.753–0.939) were determined. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that most of the data were within the 95% consistency limit. In summary, the OMCS has good repeatability and validity when measuring CROM and is an effective way to evaluate cervical vertebral range of motion. D.A. Spandidos 2019-12 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6862302/ /pubmed/31777530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8105 Text en Copyright: © Feng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Feng, Minshan
Liang, Long
Sun, Wu
Liu, Guang Wei
Yin, Xunlu
Han, Tao
Wei, Xu
Zhu, Liguo
Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
title Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
title_full Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
title_fullStr Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
title_full_unstemmed Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
title_short Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
title_sort measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: repeatability and validity
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8105
work_keys_str_mv AT fengminshan measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT lianglong measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT sunwu measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT liuguangwei measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT yinxunlu measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT hantao measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT weixu measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity
AT zhuliguo measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity