Cargando…
Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity
The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8105 |
_version_ | 1783471523483353088 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Minshan Liang, Long Sun, Wu Liu, Guang Wei Yin, Xunlu Han, Tao Wei, Xu Zhu, Liguo |
author_facet | Feng, Minshan Liang, Long Sun, Wu Liu, Guang Wei Yin, Xunlu Han, Tao Wei, Xu Zhu, Liguo |
author_sort | Feng, Minshan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was received. The motion of the cervical spine in all directions was measured using the OMCS and CROM devices. Reproducibility of data was assessed using the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Validity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) in combination with Pearson's correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plot were presented for the two measurement methods. The range of motion (ROM) was measured by using the OMCS and the CROM device during the same session. Both procedures evidenced high ICCs [OMCS: ICC (1,2) =0.802–0.981; CROM device: ICC (1,2) =0.768–0.948], low SEM values (OMCS: 0.98°-1.38°; CROM device: 1.04°-2.45°) and low MDC values (OMCS: 2.72°-3.81°; CROM device: 2.89°-6.78°). A high R(2) (0.568–0.882) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (0.753–0.939) were determined. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that most of the data were within the 95% consistency limit. In summary, the OMCS has good repeatability and validity when measuring CROM and is an effective way to evaluate cervical vertebral range of motion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6862302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68623022019-11-27 Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity Feng, Minshan Liang, Long Sun, Wu Liu, Guang Wei Yin, Xunlu Han, Tao Wei, Xu Zhu, Liguo Exp Ther Med Articles The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was received. The motion of the cervical spine in all directions was measured using the OMCS and CROM devices. Reproducibility of data was assessed using the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). Validity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) in combination with Pearson's correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plot were presented for the two measurement methods. The range of motion (ROM) was measured by using the OMCS and the CROM device during the same session. Both procedures evidenced high ICCs [OMCS: ICC (1,2) =0.802–0.981; CROM device: ICC (1,2) =0.768–0.948], low SEM values (OMCS: 0.98°-1.38°; CROM device: 1.04°-2.45°) and low MDC values (OMCS: 2.72°-3.81°; CROM device: 2.89°-6.78°). A high R(2) (0.568–0.882) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (0.753–0.939) were determined. The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that most of the data were within the 95% consistency limit. In summary, the OMCS has good repeatability and validity when measuring CROM and is an effective way to evaluate cervical vertebral range of motion. D.A. Spandidos 2019-12 2019-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6862302/ /pubmed/31777530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8105 Text en Copyright: © Feng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Feng, Minshan Liang, Long Sun, Wu Liu, Guang Wei Yin, Xunlu Han, Tao Wei, Xu Zhu, Liguo Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity |
title | Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity |
title_full | Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity |
title_fullStr | Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity |
title_short | Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity |
title_sort | measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: repeatability and validity |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31777530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengminshan measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT lianglong measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT sunwu measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT liuguangwei measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT yinxunlu measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT hantao measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT weixu measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity AT zhuliguo measurementsofcervicalrangeofmotionusinganopticalmotioncapturesystemrepeatabilityandvalidity |