Cargando…

Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs

It is important for schoolchildren and their parents (or guardians) to know which backpacks exert the least strain on the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we investigated the physiological responses of participants while they were walking on a treadmill and wearing one of three different bac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadan, Mohamed Z., Al-Tayyar, Sultan N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31653095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214104
_version_ 1783471559160102912
author Ramadan, Mohamed Z.
Al-Tayyar, Sultan N.
author_facet Ramadan, Mohamed Z.
Al-Tayyar, Sultan N.
author_sort Ramadan, Mohamed Z.
collection PubMed
description It is important for schoolchildren and their parents (or guardians) to know which backpacks exert the least strain on the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we investigated the physiological responses of participants while they were walking on a treadmill and wearing one of three different backpacks (A, B, and C) under two different load-carrying conditions (equivalent to 10% and 15% of their body mass, respectively). The first condition was used as a control and involved walking without a backpack, while the second involved wearing a backpack and carrying a certain weight. Thirty-one male students from King Saud University walked on a treadmill at 0.861 m/s and at a 0% inclination angle, while having their heart rates (beatsmin(−1)), oxygen uptakes (VO2, mLmin(−1)), respiratory rates (breaths, VO2min(−1)), perceived exertion rates (PER, Borg scale), and backpack preference rates (BPR) measured and recorded. The results of our within-subject experimental design revealed that the physiological results varied significantly depending on the type of backpack. Backpacks B and C were superior to Backpack A, resulting in lower physiological responses and higher subjective preferences. Students carrying more weight experienced higher physiological stress; moreover, the use of Backpack C led to the lowest physiological strains and higher subjective preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6862459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68624592019-12-05 Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs Ramadan, Mohamed Z. Al-Tayyar, Sultan N. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article It is important for schoolchildren and their parents (or guardians) to know which backpacks exert the least strain on the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we investigated the physiological responses of participants while they were walking on a treadmill and wearing one of three different backpacks (A, B, and C) under two different load-carrying conditions (equivalent to 10% and 15% of their body mass, respectively). The first condition was used as a control and involved walking without a backpack, while the second involved wearing a backpack and carrying a certain weight. Thirty-one male students from King Saud University walked on a treadmill at 0.861 m/s and at a 0% inclination angle, while having their heart rates (beatsmin(−1)), oxygen uptakes (VO2, mLmin(−1)), respiratory rates (breaths, VO2min(−1)), perceived exertion rates (PER, Borg scale), and backpack preference rates (BPR) measured and recorded. The results of our within-subject experimental design revealed that the physiological results varied significantly depending on the type of backpack. Backpacks B and C were superior to Backpack A, resulting in lower physiological responses and higher subjective preferences. Students carrying more weight experienced higher physiological stress; moreover, the use of Backpack C led to the lowest physiological strains and higher subjective preferences. MDPI 2019-10-24 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6862459/ /pubmed/31653095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214104 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ramadan, Mohamed Z.
Al-Tayyar, Sultan N.
Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs
title Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs
title_full Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs
title_fullStr Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs
title_short Comparison between the Physiological Responses and Subjective Ratings of a Group of Male Students to Three Backpack Designs
title_sort comparison between the physiological responses and subjective ratings of a group of male students to three backpack designs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31653095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214104
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadanmohamedz comparisonbetweenthephysiologicalresponsesandsubjectiveratingsofagroupofmalestudentstothreebackpackdesigns
AT altayyarsultann comparisonbetweenthephysiologicalresponsesandsubjectiveratingsofagroupofmalestudentstothreebackpackdesigns