Cargando…
Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
In recent years, there is a trend of low C/N ratio in municipal domestic wastewater, which results in serious problems for nitrogen removal from wastewater. The addition of an external soluble carbon source has been the usual procedure to achieve denitrification. However, the disadvantage of this tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214184 |
_version_ | 1783471563016765440 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Qian Chen, Xue Wu, Heng Luo, Wandong Liu, Xiangyang Feng, Li Zhao, Tiantao |
author_facet | Zhang, Qian Chen, Xue Wu, Heng Luo, Wandong Liu, Xiangyang Feng, Li Zhao, Tiantao |
author_sort | Zhang, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, there is a trend of low C/N ratio in municipal domestic wastewater, which results in serious problems for nitrogen removal from wastewater. The addition of an external soluble carbon source has been the usual procedure to achieve denitrification. However, the disadvantage of this treatment process is the need of a closed, rather sophisticated and costly process control as well as the risk of overdosing. Solid-phase denitrification using biodegradable polymers as biofilm carrier and carbon source was considered as an attractive alternative for biological denitrification. The start-up time of the novel process using PCL (polycaprolactone) as biofilm carrier and carbon source was comparable with that of conventional process using ceramsite as biofilm carrier and acetate as carbon source. Further, the solid-phase denitrification process showed higher nitrogen removal efficiency under shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT) and low carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio since the biofilm was firmly attached to the clear pores on the surface of PCL carriers and in this process bacteria that could degrade PCL carriers to obtain electron donor for denitrification was found. In addition, solid-phase denitrification process had a stronger resistance of shock loading than that in conventional process. This study revealed, for the first time, that the physical properties of the biodegradable polymer played a vital role in denitrification, and the different microbial compositions of the two processes was the main reason for the different denitrification performances under low C/N ratio. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6862475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68624752019-12-05 Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal Zhang, Qian Chen, Xue Wu, Heng Luo, Wandong Liu, Xiangyang Feng, Li Zhao, Tiantao Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In recent years, there is a trend of low C/N ratio in municipal domestic wastewater, which results in serious problems for nitrogen removal from wastewater. The addition of an external soluble carbon source has been the usual procedure to achieve denitrification. However, the disadvantage of this treatment process is the need of a closed, rather sophisticated and costly process control as well as the risk of overdosing. Solid-phase denitrification using biodegradable polymers as biofilm carrier and carbon source was considered as an attractive alternative for biological denitrification. The start-up time of the novel process using PCL (polycaprolactone) as biofilm carrier and carbon source was comparable with that of conventional process using ceramsite as biofilm carrier and acetate as carbon source. Further, the solid-phase denitrification process showed higher nitrogen removal efficiency under shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT) and low carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio since the biofilm was firmly attached to the clear pores on the surface of PCL carriers and in this process bacteria that could degrade PCL carriers to obtain electron donor for denitrification was found. In addition, solid-phase denitrification process had a stronger resistance of shock loading than that in conventional process. This study revealed, for the first time, that the physical properties of the biodegradable polymer played a vital role in denitrification, and the different microbial compositions of the two processes was the main reason for the different denitrification performances under low C/N ratio. MDPI 2019-10-29 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6862475/ /pubmed/31671860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214184 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Qian Chen, Xue Wu, Heng Luo, Wandong Liu, Xiangyang Feng, Li Zhao, Tiantao Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal |
title | Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal |
title_full | Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal |
title_short | Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal |
title_sort | comparison of clay ceramsite and biodegradable polymers as carriers in pack-bed biofilm reactor for nitrate removal |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangqian comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval AT chenxue comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval AT wuheng comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval AT luowandong comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval AT liuxiangyang comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval AT fengli comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval AT zhaotiantao comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval |