Cargando…

Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal

In recent years, there is a trend of low C/N ratio in municipal domestic wastewater, which results in serious problems for nitrogen removal from wastewater. The addition of an external soluble carbon source has been the usual procedure to achieve denitrification. However, the disadvantage of this tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qian, Chen, Xue, Wu, Heng, Luo, Wandong, Liu, Xiangyang, Feng, Li, Zhao, Tiantao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214184
_version_ 1783471563016765440
author Zhang, Qian
Chen, Xue
Wu, Heng
Luo, Wandong
Liu, Xiangyang
Feng, Li
Zhao, Tiantao
author_facet Zhang, Qian
Chen, Xue
Wu, Heng
Luo, Wandong
Liu, Xiangyang
Feng, Li
Zhao, Tiantao
author_sort Zhang, Qian
collection PubMed
description In recent years, there is a trend of low C/N ratio in municipal domestic wastewater, which results in serious problems for nitrogen removal from wastewater. The addition of an external soluble carbon source has been the usual procedure to achieve denitrification. However, the disadvantage of this treatment process is the need of a closed, rather sophisticated and costly process control as well as the risk of overdosing. Solid-phase denitrification using biodegradable polymers as biofilm carrier and carbon source was considered as an attractive alternative for biological denitrification. The start-up time of the novel process using PCL (polycaprolactone) as biofilm carrier and carbon source was comparable with that of conventional process using ceramsite as biofilm carrier and acetate as carbon source. Further, the solid-phase denitrification process showed higher nitrogen removal efficiency under shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT) and low carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio since the biofilm was firmly attached to the clear pores on the surface of PCL carriers and in this process bacteria that could degrade PCL carriers to obtain electron donor for denitrification was found. In addition, solid-phase denitrification process had a stronger resistance of shock loading than that in conventional process. This study revealed, for the first time, that the physical properties of the biodegradable polymer played a vital role in denitrification, and the different microbial compositions of the two processes was the main reason for the different denitrification performances under low C/N ratio.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6862475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68624752019-12-05 Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal Zhang, Qian Chen, Xue Wu, Heng Luo, Wandong Liu, Xiangyang Feng, Li Zhao, Tiantao Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In recent years, there is a trend of low C/N ratio in municipal domestic wastewater, which results in serious problems for nitrogen removal from wastewater. The addition of an external soluble carbon source has been the usual procedure to achieve denitrification. However, the disadvantage of this treatment process is the need of a closed, rather sophisticated and costly process control as well as the risk of overdosing. Solid-phase denitrification using biodegradable polymers as biofilm carrier and carbon source was considered as an attractive alternative for biological denitrification. The start-up time of the novel process using PCL (polycaprolactone) as biofilm carrier and carbon source was comparable with that of conventional process using ceramsite as biofilm carrier and acetate as carbon source. Further, the solid-phase denitrification process showed higher nitrogen removal efficiency under shorter hydraulic retention time (HRT) and low carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio since the biofilm was firmly attached to the clear pores on the surface of PCL carriers and in this process bacteria that could degrade PCL carriers to obtain electron donor for denitrification was found. In addition, solid-phase denitrification process had a stronger resistance of shock loading than that in conventional process. This study revealed, for the first time, that the physical properties of the biodegradable polymer played a vital role in denitrification, and the different microbial compositions of the two processes was the main reason for the different denitrification performances under low C/N ratio. MDPI 2019-10-29 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6862475/ /pubmed/31671860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214184 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Qian
Chen, Xue
Wu, Heng
Luo, Wandong
Liu, Xiangyang
Feng, Li
Zhao, Tiantao
Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
title Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
title_full Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
title_fullStr Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
title_short Comparison of Clay Ceramsite and Biodegradable Polymers as Carriers in Pack-bed Biofilm Reactor for Nitrate Removal
title_sort comparison of clay ceramsite and biodegradable polymers as carriers in pack-bed biofilm reactor for nitrate removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214184
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqian comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval
AT chenxue comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval
AT wuheng comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval
AT luowandong comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval
AT liuxiangyang comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval
AT fengli comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval
AT zhaotiantao comparisonofclayceramsiteandbiodegradablepolymersascarriersinpackbedbiofilmreactorfornitrateremoval