Cargando…

Comments on “Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals”

Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in assessing treatment regimens, and since abstracts may be the only part of a paper that a physician reads, accurate reporting of data in abstracts is essential. The CONSORT checklist for abstracts was designed to standardize data report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ochani, Rohan Kumar, Shaikh, Asim, Yamani, Naser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31744527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3857-7
Descripción
Sumario:Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in assessing treatment regimens, and since abstracts may be the only part of a paper that a physician reads, accurate reporting of data in abstracts is essential. The CONSORT checklist for abstracts was designed to standardize data reporting; however, for papers submitted to anesthesiology journals, the level of adherence to the CONSORT checklist for abstracts is unknown. Therefore, we commend Janackovic and Puljak for their efforts in determining the adherence of reports of trials in the highest-impact anesthesiology journals between 2014 and 2016. The results of their study are extremely important; however, we believe that that study had some methodological limitations, which we discuss in this manuscript.