Cargando…

Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Probiotics may be efficacious in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to clarify the efficacy of different types of probiotics for preventing VAP. METHODS: This systematic review and NMA was conducted according to the updated pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Qiong-Li, Yu, Xiu-Mei, Liu, Quan-Xing, Yang, Wang, Chang, Qin, Zhang, Yu-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519876753
_version_ 1783471656720662528
author Fan, Qiong-Li
Yu, Xiu-Mei
Liu, Quan-Xing
Yang, Wang
Chang, Qin
Zhang, Yu-Ping
author_facet Fan, Qiong-Li
Yu, Xiu-Mei
Liu, Quan-Xing
Yang, Wang
Chang, Qin
Zhang, Yu-Ping
author_sort Fan, Qiong-Li
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Probiotics may be efficacious in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to clarify the efficacy of different types of probiotics for preventing VAP. METHODS: This systematic review and NMA was conducted according to the updated preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search of public databases from inception to 17 June 2018 was performed. RESULTS: NMA showed that “Bifidobacterium longum + Lactobacillus bulgaricus + Streptococcus thermophiles” was more efficacious than “Ergyphilus” in preventing VAP (odds ratio: 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.03–0.94). According to pairwise meta-analysis, “B. longum + L. bulgaricus + S. thermophiles” and “Lactobacillus rhamnosus” were superior to placebo in preventing VAP. Treatment rank based on surface under the cumulative ranking curves revealed that the most efficacious treatment for preventing VAP was “B. longum + L. bulgaricus + S. thermophiles” (66%). In terms of reducing hospital mortality and ICU mortality, the most efficacious treatment was Synbiotic 2000FORTE (34% and 46%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on efficacy ranking, “B. longum + L. bulgaricus + S. thermophiles” should be the first choice for prevention of VAP, while Synbiotic 2000FORTE has the potential to reduce in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6862886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68628862019-12-03 Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis Fan, Qiong-Li Yu, Xiu-Mei Liu, Quan-Xing Yang, Wang Chang, Qin Zhang, Yu-Ping J Int Med Res Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Probiotics may be efficacious in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to clarify the efficacy of different types of probiotics for preventing VAP. METHODS: This systematic review and NMA was conducted according to the updated preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search of public databases from inception to 17 June 2018 was performed. RESULTS: NMA showed that “Bifidobacterium longum + Lactobacillus bulgaricus + Streptococcus thermophiles” was more efficacious than “Ergyphilus” in preventing VAP (odds ratio: 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.03–0.94). According to pairwise meta-analysis, “B. longum + L. bulgaricus + S. thermophiles” and “Lactobacillus rhamnosus” were superior to placebo in preventing VAP. Treatment rank based on surface under the cumulative ranking curves revealed that the most efficacious treatment for preventing VAP was “B. longum + L. bulgaricus + S. thermophiles” (66%). In terms of reducing hospital mortality and ICU mortality, the most efficacious treatment was Synbiotic 2000FORTE (34% and 46%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on efficacy ranking, “B. longum + L. bulgaricus + S. thermophiles” should be the first choice for prevention of VAP, while Synbiotic 2000FORTE has the potential to reduce in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality. SAGE Publications 2019-10-03 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6862886/ /pubmed/31578896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519876753 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Fan, Qiong-Li
Yu, Xiu-Mei
Liu, Quan-Xing
Yang, Wang
Chang, Qin
Zhang, Yu-Ping
Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
title Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
title_full Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
title_short Synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
title_sort synbiotics for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a probiotics strain-specific network meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6862886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519876753
work_keys_str_mv AT fanqiongli synbioticsforpreventionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaprobioticsstrainspecificnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuxiumei synbioticsforpreventionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaprobioticsstrainspecificnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuquanxing synbioticsforpreventionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaprobioticsstrainspecificnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangwang synbioticsforpreventionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaprobioticsstrainspecificnetworkmetaanalysis
AT changqin synbioticsforpreventionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaprobioticsstrainspecificnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangyuping synbioticsforpreventionofventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaprobioticsstrainspecificnetworkmetaanalysis