Cargando…

Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial

PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally adva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasrolahi, Hamid, Mirzaei, Sepideh, Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad, Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad, Mokhtari, Maral, Sasani, Mohammad Reza, Mosalaei, Ahmad, Omidvari, Shapour, Ansari, Mansour, Ahmadloo, Niloofar, Hamedi, Seyed Hasan, Khanjani, Nezhat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.06
_version_ 1783471679665602560
author Nasrolahi, Hamid
Mirzaei, Sepideh
Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad
Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad
Mokhtari, Maral
Sasani, Mohammad Reza
Mosalaei, Ahmad
Omidvari, Shapour
Ansari, Mansour
Ahmadloo, Niloofar
Hamedi, Seyed Hasan
Khanjani, Nezhat
author_facet Nasrolahi, Hamid
Mirzaei, Sepideh
Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad
Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad
Mokhtari, Maral
Sasani, Mohammad Reza
Mosalaei, Ahmad
Omidvari, Shapour
Ansari, Mansour
Ahmadloo, Niloofar
Hamedi, Seyed Hasan
Khanjani, Nezhat
author_sort Nasrolahi, Hamid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This phase-II clinical trial included 54 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3–4 and/or N1–2, M0) rectal cancer. All patients were treated with 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy using the XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) regimen before and after a concurrent standard long course of CRT (45–50.4 Gy) followed by standard radical surgery. Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate and toxicity were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS: The study participants included 37 males and 17 females, with a median age of 59 years (range, 20–80 years). Twenty-nine patients (54%) had clinical stage-II disease, and 25 patients (46%) had clinical stage-III disease. Larger tumor size (P = 0.006) and distal rectal location (P = 0.009) showed lower PCR compared to smaller tumor size and upper rectal location. Pathologic examinations showed significant tumor regression (6.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 cm, P < 0.001) with 10 PCRs (18.5%) compared to before the intervention. The surgical margin was free of cancer in 52 patients (96.3%). Treatment-related toxicities were easily tolerated, and all patients completed their planned treatment without interruption. Grade III and IV toxicities were infrequent. CONCLUSION: The addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment approach in patients with rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6863011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68630112019-11-27 Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial Nasrolahi, Hamid Mirzaei, Sepideh Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari, Maral Sasani, Mohammad Reza Mosalaei, Ahmad Omidvari, Shapour Ansari, Mansour Ahmadloo, Niloofar Hamedi, Seyed Hasan Khanjani, Nezhat Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This phase-II clinical trial included 54 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3–4 and/or N1–2, M0) rectal cancer. All patients were treated with 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy using the XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) regimen before and after a concurrent standard long course of CRT (45–50.4 Gy) followed by standard radical surgery. Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate and toxicity were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS: The study participants included 37 males and 17 females, with a median age of 59 years (range, 20–80 years). Twenty-nine patients (54%) had clinical stage-II disease, and 25 patients (46%) had clinical stage-III disease. Larger tumor size (P = 0.006) and distal rectal location (P = 0.009) showed lower PCR compared to smaller tumor size and upper rectal location. Pathologic examinations showed significant tumor regression (6.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 cm, P < 0.001) with 10 PCRs (18.5%) compared to before the intervention. The surgical margin was free of cancer in 52 patients (96.3%). Treatment-related toxicities were easily tolerated, and all patients completed their planned treatment without interruption. Grade III and IV toxicities were infrequent. CONCLUSION: The addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment approach in patients with rectal cancer. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2019-10 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6863011/ /pubmed/31725999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.06 Text en © 2019 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nasrolahi, Hamid
Mirzaei, Sepideh
Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad
Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad
Mokhtari, Maral
Sasani, Mohammad Reza
Mosalaei, Ahmad
Omidvari, Shapour
Ansari, Mansour
Ahmadloo, Niloofar
Hamedi, Seyed Hasan
Khanjani, Nezhat
Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
title Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
title_full Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
title_short Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
title_sort efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase ii clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.06
work_keys_str_mv AT nasrolahihamid efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT mirzaeisepideh efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT mohammadianpanahmohammad efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT bananzadehalimohammad efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT mokhtarimaral efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT sasanimohammadreza efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT mosalaeiahmad efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT omidvarishapour efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT ansarimansour efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT ahmadlooniloofar efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT hamediseyedhasan efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT khanjaninezhat efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial