Cargando…
Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial
PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally adva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Coloproctology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.06 |
_version_ | 1783471679665602560 |
---|---|
author | Nasrolahi, Hamid Mirzaei, Sepideh Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari, Maral Sasani, Mohammad Reza Mosalaei, Ahmad Omidvari, Shapour Ansari, Mansour Ahmadloo, Niloofar Hamedi, Seyed Hasan Khanjani, Nezhat |
author_facet | Nasrolahi, Hamid Mirzaei, Sepideh Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari, Maral Sasani, Mohammad Reza Mosalaei, Ahmad Omidvari, Shapour Ansari, Mansour Ahmadloo, Niloofar Hamedi, Seyed Hasan Khanjani, Nezhat |
author_sort | Nasrolahi, Hamid |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This phase-II clinical trial included 54 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3–4 and/or N1–2, M0) rectal cancer. All patients were treated with 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy using the XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) regimen before and after a concurrent standard long course of CRT (45–50.4 Gy) followed by standard radical surgery. Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate and toxicity were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS: The study participants included 37 males and 17 females, with a median age of 59 years (range, 20–80 years). Twenty-nine patients (54%) had clinical stage-II disease, and 25 patients (46%) had clinical stage-III disease. Larger tumor size (P = 0.006) and distal rectal location (P = 0.009) showed lower PCR compared to smaller tumor size and upper rectal location. Pathologic examinations showed significant tumor regression (6.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 cm, P < 0.001) with 10 PCRs (18.5%) compared to before the intervention. The surgical margin was free of cancer in 52 patients (96.3%). Treatment-related toxicities were easily tolerated, and all patients completed their planned treatment without interruption. Grade III and IV toxicities were infrequent. CONCLUSION: The addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment approach in patients with rectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6863011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Coloproctology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68630112019-11-27 Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial Nasrolahi, Hamid Mirzaei, Sepideh Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari, Maral Sasani, Mohammad Reza Mosalaei, Ahmad Omidvari, Shapour Ansari, Mansour Ahmadloo, Niloofar Hamedi, Seyed Hasan Khanjani, Nezhat Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Currently, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by total mesorectal resection is considered the standard of care for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This phase-II clinical trial included 54 patients with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3–4 and/or N1–2, M0) rectal cancer. All patients were treated with 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy using the XELOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin) regimen before and after a concurrent standard long course of CRT (45–50.4 Gy) followed by standard radical surgery. Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate and toxicity were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS: The study participants included 37 males and 17 females, with a median age of 59 years (range, 20–80 years). Twenty-nine patients (54%) had clinical stage-II disease, and 25 patients (46%) had clinical stage-III disease. Larger tumor size (P = 0.006) and distal rectal location (P = 0.009) showed lower PCR compared to smaller tumor size and upper rectal location. Pathologic examinations showed significant tumor regression (6.1 ± 2.7 cm vs. 1.9 ± 1.8 cm, P < 0.001) with 10 PCRs (18.5%) compared to before the intervention. The surgical margin was free of cancer in 52 patients (96.3%). Treatment-related toxicities were easily tolerated, and all patients completed their planned treatment without interruption. Grade III and IV toxicities were infrequent. CONCLUSION: The addition of induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant CRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment approach in patients with rectal cancer. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2019-10 2019-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6863011/ /pubmed/31725999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.06 Text en © 2019 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nasrolahi, Hamid Mirzaei, Sepideh Mohammadianpanah, Mohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari, Maral Sasani, Mohammad Reza Mosalaei, Ahmad Omidvari, Shapour Ansari, Mansour Ahmadloo, Niloofar Hamedi, Seyed Hasan Khanjani, Nezhat Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial |
title | Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_full | Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_short | Efficacy and Feasibility of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_sort | efficacy and feasibility of adding induction chemotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase ii clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.06 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nasrolahihamid efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT mirzaeisepideh efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT mohammadianpanahmohammad efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT bananzadehalimohammad efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT mokhtarimaral efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT sasanimohammadreza efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT mosalaeiahmad efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT omidvarishapour efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT ansarimansour efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT ahmadlooniloofar efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT hamediseyedhasan efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial AT khanjaninezhat efficacyandfeasibilityofaddinginductionchemotherapytoneoadjuvantchemoradiationinlocallyadvancedrectalcanceraphaseiiclinicaltrial |