Cargando…
Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for digital impression of simulated implant scan bodies in a partially edentulous model. A 3D printed partially edentulous mandible model made of Co-Cr with a total of 6 bilaterally positioned cylinders in the canine,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222070 |
_version_ | 1783471727399927808 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Ryan Jin-Young Benic, Goran I. Park, Ji-Man |
author_facet | Kim, Ryan Jin-Young Benic, Goran I. Park, Ji-Man |
author_sort | Kim, Ryan Jin-Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for digital impression of simulated implant scan bodies in a partially edentulous model. A 3D printed partially edentulous mandible model made of Co-Cr with a total of 6 bilaterally positioned cylinders in the canine, second premolar, and second molar area served as the study model. Digital scans of the model were made with a reference scanner (steroSCAN neo) and 5 IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, i500, iTero Element, and TRIOS 3) (n = 10). For each IOS’s dataset, the XYZ coordinates of the cylinders were obtained from the reference point and the deviations from the reference scanner were calculated using a 3D reverse engineering program (Rapidform). The trueness values were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc test. Direction and amount of deviation differed among cylinder position and among IOSs. Regardless of the IOS type, the cylinders positioned on the left second molar, nearest to the scanning start point, showed the smallest deviation. The deviation generally increased further away from scanning start point towards the right second molar. TRIOS 3 and i500 outperformed the other IOSs for partially edentulous digital impression. The accuracy of the CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, and iTero Element were similar on the left side, but they showed more deviations on the right side of the arch when compared to the other IOSs. The accuracy of IOS is still an area that needs to be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6863547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68635472019-12-07 Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position Kim, Ryan Jin-Young Benic, Goran I. Park, Ji-Man PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for digital impression of simulated implant scan bodies in a partially edentulous model. A 3D printed partially edentulous mandible model made of Co-Cr with a total of 6 bilaterally positioned cylinders in the canine, second premolar, and second molar area served as the study model. Digital scans of the model were made with a reference scanner (steroSCAN neo) and 5 IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, i500, iTero Element, and TRIOS 3) (n = 10). For each IOS’s dataset, the XYZ coordinates of the cylinders were obtained from the reference point and the deviations from the reference scanner were calculated using a 3D reverse engineering program (Rapidform). The trueness values were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc test. Direction and amount of deviation differed among cylinder position and among IOSs. Regardless of the IOS type, the cylinders positioned on the left second molar, nearest to the scanning start point, showed the smallest deviation. The deviation generally increased further away from scanning start point towards the right second molar. TRIOS 3 and i500 outperformed the other IOSs for partially edentulous digital impression. The accuracy of the CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, and iTero Element were similar on the left side, but they showed more deviations on the right side of the arch when compared to the other IOSs. The accuracy of IOS is still an area that needs to be improved. Public Library of Science 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6863547/ /pubmed/31743331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222070 Text en © 2019 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Ryan Jin-Young Benic, Goran I. Park, Ji-Man Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
title | Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
title_full | Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
title_fullStr | Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
title_full_unstemmed | Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
title_short | Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
title_sort | trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimryanjinyoung truenessofdigitalintraoralimpressioninreproducingmultipleimplantposition AT benicgorani truenessofdigitalintraoralimpressioninreproducingmultipleimplantposition AT parkjiman truenessofdigitalintraoralimpressioninreproducingmultipleimplantposition |