Cargando…

Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position

The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for digital impression of simulated implant scan bodies in a partially edentulous model. A 3D printed partially edentulous mandible model made of Co-Cr with a total of 6 bilaterally positioned cylinders in the canine,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ryan Jin-Young, Benic, Goran I., Park, Ji-Man
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222070
_version_ 1783471727399927808
author Kim, Ryan Jin-Young
Benic, Goran I.
Park, Ji-Man
author_facet Kim, Ryan Jin-Young
Benic, Goran I.
Park, Ji-Man
author_sort Kim, Ryan Jin-Young
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for digital impression of simulated implant scan bodies in a partially edentulous model. A 3D printed partially edentulous mandible model made of Co-Cr with a total of 6 bilaterally positioned cylinders in the canine, second premolar, and second molar area served as the study model. Digital scans of the model were made with a reference scanner (steroSCAN neo) and 5 IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, i500, iTero Element, and TRIOS 3) (n = 10). For each IOS’s dataset, the XYZ coordinates of the cylinders were obtained from the reference point and the deviations from the reference scanner were calculated using a 3D reverse engineering program (Rapidform). The trueness values were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc test. Direction and amount of deviation differed among cylinder position and among IOSs. Regardless of the IOS type, the cylinders positioned on the left second molar, nearest to the scanning start point, showed the smallest deviation. The deviation generally increased further away from scanning start point towards the right second molar. TRIOS 3 and i500 outperformed the other IOSs for partially edentulous digital impression. The accuracy of the CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, and iTero Element were similar on the left side, but they showed more deviations on the right side of the arch when compared to the other IOSs. The accuracy of IOS is still an area that needs to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6863547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68635472019-12-07 Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position Kim, Ryan Jin-Young Benic, Goran I. Park, Ji-Man PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 5 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for digital impression of simulated implant scan bodies in a partially edentulous model. A 3D printed partially edentulous mandible model made of Co-Cr with a total of 6 bilaterally positioned cylinders in the canine, second premolar, and second molar area served as the study model. Digital scans of the model were made with a reference scanner (steroSCAN neo) and 5 IOSs (CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, i500, iTero Element, and TRIOS 3) (n = 10). For each IOS’s dataset, the XYZ coordinates of the cylinders were obtained from the reference point and the deviations from the reference scanner were calculated using a 3D reverse engineering program (Rapidform). The trueness values were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney post hoc test. Direction and amount of deviation differed among cylinder position and among IOSs. Regardless of the IOS type, the cylinders positioned on the left second molar, nearest to the scanning start point, showed the smallest deviation. The deviation generally increased further away from scanning start point towards the right second molar. TRIOS 3 and i500 outperformed the other IOSs for partially edentulous digital impression. The accuracy of the CEREC Omnicam, CS3600, and iTero Element were similar on the left side, but they showed more deviations on the right side of the arch when compared to the other IOSs. The accuracy of IOS is still an area that needs to be improved. Public Library of Science 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6863547/ /pubmed/31743331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222070 Text en © 2019 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Ryan Jin-Young
Benic, Goran I.
Park, Ji-Man
Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
title Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
title_full Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
title_fullStr Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
title_full_unstemmed Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
title_short Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
title_sort trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6863547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222070
work_keys_str_mv AT kimryanjinyoung truenessofdigitalintraoralimpressioninreproducingmultipleimplantposition
AT benicgorani truenessofdigitalintraoralimpressioninreproducingmultipleimplantposition
AT parkjiman truenessofdigitalintraoralimpressioninreproducingmultipleimplantposition